RMR vs PLD vs CWK Stock Comparison

Rmr, Prologis and Cushman & Wakefield Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RMR Rmr Group Inc.
$17.32 -6.5% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$290.74M
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$638.98M
Div. yield
0.11%
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
4 wins
PLD Prologis, Inc.
$126.47 -4.9% 1M -0.5% 1Y
Market cap
$116.82B
P/E
27.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.19B
Div. yield
–
Industrial REITs Real Estate
4 wins
CWK Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.
$12.07 -0.8% 1M -29.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.96B
P/E
42.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.82B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Prologis leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Prologis 4, Rmr 4, Cushman & Wakefield 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRMRPLDCWKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $290.74M $116.82B $2.96B PLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.7x 27.8x 42.8x RMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.1x 35.5x 7.9x CWK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -15.2% +7.3% +11.0% CWK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.1% 45.7% 0.6% PLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.1% 5.0% 7.0% CWK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 4.4x 3.7x RMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.11% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.9% -0.5% -29.0% RMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.4%/yr -2.9%/yr -8.2%/yr PLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.4% 20.5% 45.5% PLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 49/100 38/100 RMR

Percentile Scorecard

RMRPLDCWK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRMRPLDCWK
Valuation 77 #5 of 18 8 #133 of 145 65 #7 of 18
Growth 7 #15 of 16 59 #59 of 141 27 #12 of 16
Profitability 60 #7 of 16 77 #31 of 134 40 #10 of 16
Financial Health 75 #5 of 17 85 #21 of 138 19 #14 of 17
Shareholder Returns – 14 #113 of 131 –
Overall 55 49 38
  • RMR ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • PLD ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • CWK ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRMRPLDCWKSPY
1 month -6.5%-4.9%-0.8% -0.2%
3 months -13.6%-14.0%-11.6% +3.9%
6 months -3.8%-10.6%-16.8% +8.2%
Year to date +16.2%-0.9%-25.4% +12.9%
1 year +17.9%-0.5%-29.0% +12.3%
3 years -20.6%+30.0%+80.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -7.4%+9.1%+21.8% +23.3%
5 years -51.4%-13.8%-34.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -13.4%-2.9%-8.2% +10.9%
10 years -50.7%+148.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -6.8%+9.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRMRPLDCWKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.4%20.5%45.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.8%20.7%46.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.300.391.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.65-0.02-0.64 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.0%-48.1%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.0%-15.6%-29.8% -1.2%
52-week high $21.37$149.92$17.20 $779.14
52-week low $14.45$122.40$11.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRMRPLDCWK
P/E now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 21.2x 28.1xmedian 26.3x 40.9xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 12.8xmedian 4.0x 0.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 9.8x 19.4xmedian 14.4x 8.5xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -10.7xmedian 12.3x -256.8xmedian 23.3x -345.2xmedian 12.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.8x 2.0xmedian 1.3x 1.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.46median 0.52 3.34median 1.91 0.52median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRMRPLDCWK
Revenue $638.98M $9.19B $10.82B
Gross profit – – $1.96B
Operating income $40.72M $5.03B $477.30M
Net income $43.87M $4.47B $69.10M
Free cash flow -$51.85M -$459.56M -$8.20M
EPS (diluted) $1.18 $4.39 $0.29
Cash & equivalents $58.20M $1.77B $500.50M
Total debt $163.81M $36.44B $2.66B
Shares (diluted) 16.79M 957.88M 236.30M
Enterprise value $40.82M $111.87B $436.53M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRMRPLDCWK
P/E 14.7x 28.1x 40.9x
P/FCF -10.7x -256.8x -345.2x
P/Operating cash flow 5.6x 22.5x 50.9x
P/S 0.9x 12.8x 0.3x
P/B 1.4x 2.0x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 2.0x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 9.8x 19.4x 8.5x
EV/EBIT 16.2x 30.4x 10.5x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 16.6x 0.5x
EV/FCF -12.8x -332.2x -608.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.7x 29.1x 89.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.46 3.34 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRMRPLDCWK
Revenue growth (1Y) -15.2% 7.3% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.3% 6.0% 3.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 8.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.5% 12.7% 14.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -30.3% 10.6% 22.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.7% 21.9% -66.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.8% 8.9% 81.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.7% 21.8% -67.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -31.9% 8.4% 79.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 81.1% 1.3% -65.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.6% 2.9% -0.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -25.2% -130.1% -106.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -34.4% 47.6% -35.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRMRPLDCWK
Gross margin – – 18.1%
EBITDA margin 10.5% 85.4% 5.5%
Operating margin 6.4% 54.7% 4.4%
Pretax margin 8.3% 51.9% 0.9%
Net margin 3.1% 45.7% 0.6%
FCF margin -8.1% -5.0% -0.1%
Operating cash flow margin 15.4% 57.0% 0.5%
Return on equity 10.9% 7.7% 3.5%
Return on assets 6.3% 4.5% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 6.1% 5.0% 7.0%
Return on capital employed 6.9% – 9.2%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.1x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 1.2x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.2% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRMRPLDCWK
Debt / assets 23.0% 36.1% 35.2%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.6x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 4.4x 3.7x
Debt / FCF -3.2x -79.3x -324.2x
Liabilities / assets 44.1% 42.5% 73.2%
Equity / assets 55.9% 57.5% 26.8%
Interest coverage 4.0x 4.8x 2.2x
Current ratio 1.4x – 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.6x – 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x – 0.2x
Altman Z-score 3.14 – 1.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRMRPLDCWK
Dividend yield 10.4% 3.3% –
Net buyback yield 0.2% – –
Shareholder yield 10.5% 3.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 69.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -59.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 4.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRMRPLDCWK
Forward P/E 27.1xFY2026 35.5xFY2026 7.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.64FY2026 $3.56FY2026 $1.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -43.4%FY2026 0.0%FY2026 +334.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.2% +2.0% +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $671.70MFY2026 $8.99BFY2026 $11.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.1%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +12.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.6% +1.3% +7.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRMRPLDCWK
Held by institutions 75.5% 94.5% 96.0%
Institutions holding 165 1,724 310
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +1.5% +6.0%
Institutions buying 81 968 170
Institutions selling 32 531 99
Buyers to sellers 2.53 1.82 1.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RMRPLDCWK
RMR 1.00 0.30 0.34
PLD 0.30 1.00 0.34
CWK 0.34 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RMR, PLD and CWK?

Prologis (PLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rmr (RMR) $290.74M, Prologis (PLD) $116.82B, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) $2.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, RMR, PLD and CWK?

Rmr (RMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rmr (RMR) 14.7x, Prologis (PLD) 27.8x, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 42.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) is cheapest (Rmr (RMR) 27.1x, Prologis (PLD) 35.5x, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 7.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rmr (RMR) -15.2%, Prologis (PLD) +7.3%, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Prologis (PLD) has the highest net margin (Rmr (RMR) 3.1%, Prologis (PLD) 45.7%, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 0.6%). On return on invested capital, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) leads (Rmr (RMR) 6.1%, Prologis (PLD) 5.0%, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 7.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rmr (RMR) returned the most: Rmr (RMR) +17.9%, Prologis (PLD) -0.5%, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) -29.0%. Over five years, Prologis (PLD) compounded fastest (Rmr (RMR) -13.4%/yr, Prologis (PLD) -2.9%/yr, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) -8.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rmr (RMR) 0.11%, Prologis (PLD) 0.00%, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 0.00%. Prologis (PLD) and Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Prologis (PLD) has been the steadiest (Rmr (RMR) 27.4%, Prologis (PLD) 20.5%, Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) 45.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RMR, PLD and CWK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Prologis (PLD) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.