RLJ vs OMAB vs XHR Stock Comparison

RLJ Lodging Trust, Central North Airport and Xenia Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RLJ RLJ Lodging Trust
$12.51 +13.1% 1M +81.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.91B
P/E
758.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.38B
Div. yield
4.80%
Hotel REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 5, RLJ Lodging Trust 5, Xenia Hotels & Resorts 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRLJOMABXHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.91B $4.74B $1.91B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 758.2x 16.0x -264.3x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 417.0x 14.9x — OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.1% — +1.6% XHR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% — -0.7% RLJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.0% — 2.9% RLJ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.2x — 6.0x RLJ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.80% 5.51% 2.71% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +81.6% -4.2% +61.0% RLJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.8%/yr +15.2%/yr +3.1%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.1% 31.1% 27.4% XHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 46/100 46/100 RLJ

Percentile Scorecard

RLJOMABXHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRLJOMABXHR
Valuation 92 #12 of 145 30 #96 of 136 72 #42 of 145
Growth 21 #113 of 142 – 19 #115 of 142
Profitability 49 #69 of 135 – 34 #90 of 135
Financial Health 40 #82 of 136 35 #94 of 143 41 #81 of 136
Shareholder Returns 81 #26 of 131 75 #21 of 81 66 #45 of 131
Overall 57 46 46
  • RLJ ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • XHR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRLJOMABXHRSPY
1 month +13.1%-3.6%+12.3% +0.9%
3 months +1.1%-7.6%-5.2% +5.9%
6 months +51.3%-7.4%+28.7% +8.5%
Year to date +67.9%-9.7%+46.3% +13.3%
1 year +81.6%-4.2%+61.0% +12.4%
3 years +37.0%+73.1%+83.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year +11.1%+20.1%+22.5% +23.5%
5 years -13.2%+103.0%+16.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -2.8%+15.2%+3.1% +11.0%
10 years -36.0%+108.9%+33.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year -4.4%+7.6%+2.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRLJOMABXHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.1%31.1%27.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.6%28.0%28.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.661.120.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.90-0.142.23 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -60.1%-42.1%-54.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-27.2%-5.2% -0.9%
52-week high $12.51$134.98$21.82 $779.14
52-week low $6.80$88.75$12.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRLJOMABXHR
P/E now vs peer median 758.2xmedian 25.8x 16.0xmedian 16.1x -264.3xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 4.0x 5.3xmedian 0.9x 1.7xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 14.2x —median 8.6x 15.3xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 23.0x 11.7xmedian 11.6x 16.5xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -12.02median 1.91 —median 0.80 9.03median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRLJOMABXHR
Revenue $1.38B – $1.09B
Gross profit – – $337.00M
Operating income – – $73.11M
Net income $27.66M – -$7.69M
Free cash flow $173.52M – $115.51M
EPS (diluted) $0.02 – $-0.08
Cash & equivalents $937.60M $172.32M $112.36M
Total debt $2.70B $746.90M $1.36B
Shares (diluted) 150.93M – 92.25M
Enterprise value -$156.45M $4.23B $1.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRLJOMABXHR
P/E 758.2x 16.0x -264.3x
P/FCF 11.0x 11.7x 16.5x
P/Operating cash flow 7.1x – 10.5x
P/S 1.4x 5.3x 1.7x
P/B 0.9x 7.5x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 0.9x -9.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.8x – 15.3x
EV/EBIT 25.9x – 43.2x
EV/Revenue 2.7x – 2.9x
EV/FCF 21.1x – 27.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.7x – 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -12.02 – 9.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRLJOMABXHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.1% – 1.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.3% – 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 3.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 0.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -13.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -52.4% – -111.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.9% – -28.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -92.5% – -112.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -63.1% – -29.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.7% – 5.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.3% – -1.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.9% – 356.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.8% – 2.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRLJOMABXHR
Gross margin – – 30.8%
EBITDA margin 24.4% – 18.9%
Operating margin – – 6.7%
Pretax margin 2.1% – -0.6%
Net margin 0.2% – -0.7%
FCF margin 12.6% – 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 19.3% – 16.6%
Return on equity 1.3% – -0.7%
Return on assets 0.6% – -0.3%
Return on invested capital 3.0% – 2.9%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 9.7x – -23.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRLJOMABXHR
Debt / assets 51.5% 43.4% 50.0%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.2x – 6.0x
Debt / FCF 15.5x – 11.8x
Liabilities / assets 58.6% 63.1% 57.2%
Equity / assets 41.4% 36.9% 42.8%
Interest coverage 1.3x – 0.9x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRLJOMABXHR
Dividend yield 4.8% 5.5% 2.7%
Net buyback yield 1.5% – 2.6%
Shareholder yield 6.3% 5.5% 5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 330.2% – -9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 52.6% – 0.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.0% – 32.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 43.8% – -68.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRLJOMABXHR
Forward P/E 417.0xFY2026 14.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.03FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $-0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +200.0%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 -103.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +33.3% +28.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.32BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $1.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.6%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.4% +19.6% +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRLJOMABXHR
Held by institutions 93.3% 12.3% 95.2%
Institutions holding 223 163 298
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.6% +5.4% -2.2%
Institutions buying 118 77 161
Institutions selling 75 59 90
Buyers to sellers 1.57 1.31 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RLJOMABXHR
RLJ 1.00 0.26 0.73
OMAB 0.26 1.00 0.29
XHR 0.73 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RLJ, OMAB and XHR?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) $1.91B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.74B, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) $1.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, RLJ, OMAB and XHR?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 758.2x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -264.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 417.0x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) +1.1%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +1.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) has the highest net margin (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 0.2%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) leads (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 3.0%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) returned the most: RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) +81.6%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -4.2%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +61.0%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) -2.8%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +3.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 4.80%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.51%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.71%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has been the steadiest (RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) 28.1%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 27.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RLJ, OMAB and XHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.