RKT vs RMSG vs PFSI Stock Comparison

Rocket Companies, Real Messenger and PennyMac Financial Services Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$11.85 -2.7% 1M -34.7% 1Y
Market cap
$32.90B
P/E
69.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins
RMSG Real Messenger Corp
$0.22 -24.1% 1M -91.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.96M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

PennyMac Financial Services leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (PennyMac Financial Services 8, Rocket Companies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRKTRMSGPFSILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.90B $1.96M $3.32B RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 69.8x -0.5x 8.5x PFSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x — 13.9x PFSI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +101.7% — +25.9% RKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% — 17.7% PFSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.4% — 13.0% PFSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.8x — 2.5x PFSI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.7% -91.1% -51.8% RKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.6%/yr -53.3%/yr +0.6%/yr PFSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.9% 257.4% 52.3% PFSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 — 50/100 PFSI

Percentile Scorecard

RKTRMSGPFSI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRKTRMSGPFSI
Valuation 16 #142 of 169 0 #18 of 18 40 #102 of 169
Growth 91 #16 of 160 – 52 #77 of 160
Profitability 34 #99 of 149 – 48 #78 of 149
Financial Health 47 #85 of 158 69 #6 of 17 47 #84 of 158
Shareholder Returns 16 #114 of 136 – 62 #53 of 136
Overall 41 – 50
  • RKT ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RMSG ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • PFSI ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRKTRMSGPFSISPY
1 month -2.7%-24.1%-2.2% -0.2%
3 months -15.2%-42.1%-25.3% +3.9%
6 months -22.6%-84.8%-29.7% +8.2%
Year to date -38.8%-83.7%-51.4% +12.9%
1 year -34.7%-91.1%-51.8% +12.3%
3 years +62.3%-98.1%-7.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +17.5%-73.2%-2.7% +23.3%
5 years -24.9%-97.8%+3.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.6%-53.3%+0.6% +10.9%
10 years ——+276.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+14.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRKTRMSGPFSISPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.9%257.4%52.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.8%188.7%67.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.261.070.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.59-0.35-0.99 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.8%-99.4%-63.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.4%-92.6%-59.8% -1.2%
52-week high $23.44$2.99$159.46 $779.14
52-week low $10.53$0.22$57.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRKTRMSGPFSI
P/E now vs peer median 71.3xmedian 11.1x -0.5xmedian 21.2x 8.5xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.6x 66.5xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.5xmedian 13.5x —median 9.8x 4.6xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -57.6xmedian 7.0x -0.5xmedian 12.3x -1.8xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 0.7x 4.0xmedian 1.8x 0.8xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.45median 0.32 —median 0.52 0.62median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRKTRMSGPFSI
Revenue $10.02B – $2.21B
Net income $471.36M – $392.38M
Free cash flow -$772.00M – -$1.80B
EPS (diluted) $0.17 – $7.37
Cash & equivalents $3.10B $321.97K $214.27M
Total debt $27.41B – $4.84B
Shares (diluted) 2.84B 8.91M 53.25M
Enterprise value $18.58B -$7.57M $371.17M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGPFSI
P/E 71.3x -0.5x 8.5x
P/FCF -57.6x -0.5x -1.8x
P/Operating cash flow -70.2x – -1.9x
P/S 4.4x 66.5x 1.5x
P/B 1.9x 4.0x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 9.6x 4.0x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA 30.5x – 4.6x
EV/EBIT 39.8x – 4.8x
EV/Revenue 6.9x – 3.4x
EV/FCF -89.1x – -4.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -108.5x – -4.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.45 – 0.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGPFSI
Revenue growth (1Y) 101.7% – 25.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.7% – 15.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 4,530% – 1.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.3% – 14.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 5,670% – 2.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 157.4% – 13.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 70.4% – -11.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.9% – -16.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.1% – -11.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.0% – -16.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGPFSI
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 22.5% – 73.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 6.6% – 22.9%
Net margin 4.7% – 17.7%
FCF margin -7.7% – -81.4%
Operating cash flow margin -6.3% – -80.7%
Return on equity 2.0% – 9.1%
Return on assets 0.8% – 1.3%
Return on invested capital 2.4% – 13.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.3x – -4.6x
Stock comp / revenue 4.3% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGPFSI
Debt / assets 45.0% – 16.2%
Debt / equity 1.2x – 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.8x – 2.5x
Debt / FCF -35.5x – -2.7x
Liabilities / assets 61.4% 51.1% 85.5%
Equity / assets 38.6% 48.9% 14.5%
Interest coverage 1.6x – 1.5x
Current ratio – 1.8x –
Quick ratio – 0.7x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGPFSI
Dividend yield – – 1.9%
Net buyback yield -0.2% – 1.2%
Shareholder yield -0.2% – 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 16.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -3.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 1.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 6.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRKTRMSGPFSI
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 – 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.60FY2026 – $4.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +114.3%FY2026 – -50.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.7% – +125.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.31BFY2026 – $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +68.8%FY2026 – +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% – +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRKTRMSGPFSI
Held by institutions 50.4% – 64.8%
Institutions holding 793 – 229
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.2% – -0.5%
Institutions buying 429 – 132
Institutions selling 259 – 66
Buyers to sellers 1.66 – 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RKTRMSGPFSI
RKT 1.00 0.10 0.57
RMSG 0.10 1.00 0.14
PFSI 0.57 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RKT, RMSG and PFSI?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rocket Companies (RKT) $32.90B, Real Messenger (RMSG) $1.96M, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) $3.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, RKT, RMSG and PFSI?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rocket Companies (RKT) 69.8x, Real Messenger (RMSG) -0.5x, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 8.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) is cheapest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 19.8x, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Companies (RKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rocket Companies (RKT) +101.7%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +25.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) has the highest net margin (Rocket Companies (RKT) 4.7%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 17.7%). On return on invested capital, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads (Rocket Companies (RKT) 2.4%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rocket Companies (RKT) returned the most: Rocket Companies (RKT) -34.7%, Real Messenger (RMSG) -91.1%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) -51.8%. Over five years, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) compounded fastest (Rocket Companies (RKT) -5.6%/yr, Real Messenger (RMSG) -53.3%/yr, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +0.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rocket Companies (RKT) 0.00%, Real Messenger (RMSG) 0.00%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 0.02%. Rocket Companies (RKT) and Real Messenger (RMSG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) has been the steadiest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 58.9%, Real Messenger (RMSG) 257.4%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 52.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RKT, RMSG and PFSI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.