RKT vs COMP vs WD Stock Comparison

Rocket Companies, Compass and Walker & Dunlop Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$11.48 -5.7% 1M -35.8% 1Y
Market cap
$33.64B
P/E
71.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins
COMP Compass, Inc.
$9.69 +3.2% 1M +20.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.36B
P/E
110.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.56B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
2 wins
WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
$34.20 -10.0% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.15B
P/E
29.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
0.08%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Walker & Dunlop leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Walker & Dunlop 6, Rocket Companies 3, Compass 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRKTCOMPWDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $33.64B $7.36B $1.15B RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 71.4x 110.1x 29.9x WD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.1x 60.6x 8.1x WD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +101.7% +67.8% +8.0% RKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.7% 0.6% 3.0% RKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.4% 0.0% 3.8% WD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.8x 25.9x 1.8x WD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -35.8% +20.7% -60.1% COMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.5%/yr -5.7%/yr -23.3%/yr COMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.9% 64.9% 46.5% WD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 40/100 48/100 WD

Percentile Scorecard

RKTCOMPWD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRKTCOMPWD
Valuation 17 #142 of 170 24 #14 of 18 50 #86 of 170
Growth 91 #16 of 160 80 #4 of 16 35 #104 of 160
Profitability 35 #97 of 149 27 #12 of 16 39 #92 of 149
Financial Health 46 #86 of 158 31 #12 of 17 71 #46 of 158
Shareholder Returns 15 #115 of 135 – 44 #76 of 135
Overall 41 40 48
  • RKT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • COMP ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • WD ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRKTCOMPWDSPY
1 month -5.7%+3.2%-10.0% -0.8%
3 months -14.9%-18.0%-30.6% +3.5%
6 months -25.7%+19.8%-32.8% +7.0%
Year to date -40.7%-8.3%-43.1% +12.2%
1 year -35.8%+20.7%-60.1% +13.0%
3 years +57.3%+375.0%-47.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.3%+68.2%-19.2% +23.1%
5 years -28.4%-25.2%-73.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.5%-5.7%-23.3% +11.0%
10 years ——+42.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+3.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRKTCOMPWDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.9%64.9%46.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.8%55.6%53.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.252.351.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.610.32-1.29 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.8%-86.3%-79.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.0%-28.6%-59.9% -1.8%
52-week high $23.44$13.58$85.36 $779.14
52-week low $10.53$6.68$31.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRKTCOMPWD
P/E now vs peer median 69.1xmedian 11.0x 110.0xmedian 21.2x 29.6xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 0.7x 0.9xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.9xmedian 13.1x 103.0xmedian 9.8x 4.8xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -55.8xmedian 6.9x 56.9xmedian 12.3x -8.7xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 0.7x 2.4xmedian 1.8x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.44median 0.32 4.00median 0.51 -0.83median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRKTCOMPWD
Revenue $10.02B $10.56B $1.29B
Operating income – -$276.10M –
Net income $471.36M $66.90M $41.08M
Free cash flow -$772.00M $128.30M -$131.24M
R&D – $360.50M –
EPS (diluted) $0.17 $0.08 $1.15
Cash & equivalents $3.10B $694.00M $160.86M
Total debt $27.41B $3.14B $820.95M
Shares (diluted) 2.84B 842.38M 33.28M
Enterprise value $19.32B $5.81B $223.04M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRKTCOMPWD
P/E 69.1x 110.0x 29.6x
P/FCF -55.8x 56.9x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow -68.0x 47.2x -9.5x
P/S 4.3x 0.7x 0.9x
P/B 1.8x 2.4x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 9.3x 486.6x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 29.9x 103.0x 4.8x
EV/EBIT 39.0x -35.3x 13.8x
EV/Revenue 6.7x 0.9x 1.4x
EV/FCF -87.3x 76.0x -13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -106.3x 63.0x -15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.44 4.00 -0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRKTCOMPWD
Revenue growth (1Y) 101.7% 67.8% 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.7% 27.8% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -368.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 17.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 4,530% 223.2% -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.3% 28.7% -33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 5,670% 186.5% -65.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 157.4% 27.5% -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 70.4% -5.6% 37.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.9% 42.5% 7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.1% -12.4% 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.0% 37.8% 8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRKTCOMPWD
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 22.5% 0.9% 29.3%
Operating margin – -2.6% –
Pretax margin 6.6% -3.3% 4.3%
Net margin 4.7% 0.6% 3.0%
FCF margin -7.7% 1.2% -10.2%
Operating cash flow margin -6.3% 1.5% -9.3%
Return on equity 2.0% 2.3% 2.4%
Return on assets 0.8% 0.8% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 2.4% 0.0% 3.8%
Return on capital employed – -4.0% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.3x 2.3x -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 4.3% 2.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRKTCOMPWD
Debt / assets 45.0% 37.7% 16.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.1x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 10.8x 25.9x 1.8x
Debt / FCF -35.5x 24.5x -6.3x
Liabilities / assets 61.4% 64.2% 64.9%
Equity / assets 38.6% 35.8% 35.1%
Interest coverage 1.6x -3.4x 1.7x
Current ratio – 1.1x –
Quick ratio – 0.7x –
Cash ratio – 0.5x –
Altman Z-score – 1.55 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRKTCOMPWD
Dividend yield – – 7.9%
Net buyback yield -0.2% -0.4% 1.8%
Shareholder yield -0.2% -0.4% 9.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 226.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -70.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRKTCOMPWD
Forward P/E 19.1xFY2026 60.6xFY2026 8.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.60FY2026 $0.16FY2026 $4.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +114.3%FY2026 – +157.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.7% +37.5% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.31BFY2026 $15.07BFY2026 $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +68.8%FY2026 +116.5%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% -1.9% +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRKTCOMPWD
Held by institutions 50.4% 93.4% 89.0%
Institutions holding 793 431 265
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.2% +7.4% +3.5%
Institutions buying 429 242 160
Institutions selling 259 119 59
Buyers to sellers 1.66 2.03 2.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RKTCOMPWD
RKT 1.00 0.58 0.40
COMP 0.58 1.00 0.33
WD 0.40 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RKT, COMP and WD?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rocket Companies (RKT) $33.64B, Compass (COMP) $7.36B, Walker & Dunlop (WD) $1.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, RKT, COMP and WD?

Walker & Dunlop (WD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rocket Companies (RKT) 71.4x, Compass (COMP) 110.1x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 29.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Walker & Dunlop (WD) is cheapest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 19.1x, Compass (COMP) 60.6x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Companies (RKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rocket Companies (RKT) +101.7%, Compass (COMP) +67.8%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rocket Companies (RKT) has the highest net margin (Rocket Companies (RKT) 4.7%, Compass (COMP) 0.6%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, Walker & Dunlop (WD) leads (Rocket Companies (RKT) 2.4%, Compass (COMP) 0.0%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass (COMP) returned the most: Rocket Companies (RKT) -35.8%, Compass (COMP) +20.7%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -60.1%. Over five years, Compass (COMP) compounded fastest (Rocket Companies (RKT) -6.5%/yr, Compass (COMP) -5.7%/yr, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -23.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rocket Companies (RKT) 0.00%, Compass (COMP) 0.00%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 0.08%. Rocket Companies (RKT) and Compass (COMP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Walker & Dunlop (WD) has been the steadiest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 58.9%, Compass (COMP) 64.9%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 46.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RKT, COMP and WD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Walker & Dunlop (WD) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.