RICK vs MSGS vs BATRA Stock Comparison

Rci Hospitality Holdings, Madison Square Garden Sports and Atlanta Braves Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Madison Square Garden Sports leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Madison Square Garden Sports 5, Rci Hospitality Holdings 2, Atlanta Braves Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRICKMSGSBATRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $215.57M $7.35B $3.49B MSGS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -51.3x 950.8x -54.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.0% +11.0% +6.8% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.5% 0.7% -8.6% MSGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — -4.6% RICK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 2.9x 61.1x MSGS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.10% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.6% +34.4% +28.0% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.1%/yr +10.2%/yr +12.2%/yr BATRA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.9% 37.8% 19.7% BATRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 38/100 19/100 RICK

Percentile Scorecard

RICKMSGSBATRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRICKMSGSBATRA
Valuation 88 #6 of 44 16 #37 of 44 7 #41 of 44
Growth 12 #38 of 43 45 #24 of 43 36 #28 of 43
Profitability 54 #20 of 42 44 #24 of 42 17 #35 of 42
Financial Health 52 #23 of 47 48 #25 of 47 17 #39 of 47
Shareholder Returns 48 #15 of 28 – –
Overall 51 38 19
  • RICK ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • BATRA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRICKMSGSBATRASPY
1 month +2.3%-24.2%-8.9% +0.9%
3 months +6.5%-23.2%-0.8% +5.9%
6 months +11.8%-8.3%+3.9% +8.5%
Year to date +18.3%+18.1%+27.9% +13.3%
1 year +9.6%+34.4%+28.0% +12.4%
3 years -46.9%+84.9%+44.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year -19.0%+22.8%+13.0% +23.5%
5 years -58.4%+62.5%+77.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -16.1%+10.2%+12.2% +11.0%
10 years +148.2%+86.8%+220.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.5%+6.4%+12.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRICKMSGSBATRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.9%37.8%19.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.1%41.1%18.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.020.450.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.230.911.42 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.5%-32.0%-22.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.0%-26.6%-8.9% -0.9%
52-week high $31.34$416.24$59.61 $779.14
52-week low $20.82$212.91$41.92 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRICKMSGSBATRA
P/E now vs peer median -51.3xmedian 16.8x 950.8xmedian 16.8x -54.3xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 6.4xmedian 1.9x 4.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 10.2x 232.4xmedian 10.2x 375.6xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 11.2x 120.1xmedian 11.2x -36.8xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.2x -27.9xmedian 2.2x 6.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.78median 0.44 -20.90median 0.44 —median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRICKMSGSBATRA
Revenue $284.42M $1.15B $749.97M
Gross profit – $320.12M $186.76M
Operating income $27.29M $28.87M -$70.66M
Net income -$3.87M $7.76M -$63.87M
Free cash flow $34.75M $61.26M -$94.86M
EPS (diluted) $-0.55 $0.32 $-0.99
Cash & equivalents $26.40M $164.51M $116.28M
Total debt $240.09M $1.10B $793.13M
Shares (diluted) 7.65M 24.25M 64.97M
Enterprise value $102.54M $6.95B $3.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRICKMSGSBATRA
P/E -51.3x 950.8x -54.3x
P/FCF 6.2x 120.1x -36.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.0x 117.4x -54.4x
P/S 0.8x 6.4x 4.6x
P/B 0.9x -27.9x 6.6x
P/Tangible book 2.8x -20.0x 8.7x
EV/EBITDA 9.8x 232.4x 375.6x
EV/EBIT 15.7x 258.0x -58.9x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 6.5x 5.6x
EV/FCF 12.4x 121.6x -43.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.1x 118.9x -65.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.78 -20.90 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRICKMSGSBATRA
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.0% 11.0% 6.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.6% 9.1% 6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12.7% 5.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.9% 8.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -20.4% 94.9% -373.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -24.7% -30.3% -19.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -123.4% 134.6% -204.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.1% -45.2% 26.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -129.2% 134.3% -198.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -28.8% -45.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -16.8% -31.6% -234.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.0% -25.7% -93.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.2% -30.4% 14.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% -26.0% -25.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRICKMSGSBATRA
Gross margin – 27.7% 24.9%
EBITDA margin 15.4% 2.8% 1.5%
Operating margin 9.6% 2.5% -9.4%
Pretax margin 0.1% 1.6% -10.1%
Net margin -1.5% 0.7% -8.6%
FCF margin 12.2% 5.3% -12.6%
Operating cash flow margin 15.0% 5.4% -8.5%
Return on equity -1.6% – -12.1%
Return on assets -0.7% 0.5% -3.7%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – -4.6%
Return on capital employed 5.4% 3.3% -6.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -11.0x 8.1x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.9% 3.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRICKMSGSBATRA
Debt / assets 42.1% 16.8% 45.6%
Debt / equity 1.0x -1.0x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.9x 2.9x 61.1x
Debt / FCF 6.9x 4.2x -8.4x
Liabilities / assets 58.3% 117.1% 69.7%
Equity / assets 41.7% -17.1% 30.3%
Interest coverage 1.6x 1.4x -1.5x
Current ratio 0.6x 0.5x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.50 2.90 1.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRICKMSGSBATRA
Dividend yield 1.1% – –
Net buyback yield 7.4% – –
Shareholder yield 8.5% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRICKMSGSBATRA
Forward P/E 4.5xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.30FY2026 $-1.03FY2027 $-0.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +412.2%FY2026 -421.9%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after -128.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $293.21MFY2026 $1.06BFY2027 $843.34MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 -7.9%FY2027 +15.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.0% +1.5% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRICKMSGSBATRA
Held by institutions 49.5% 81.3% 12.1%
Institutions holding 97 463 207
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +10.3% -1.4%
Institutions buying 51 247 93
Institutions selling 24 136 43
Buyers to sellers 2.13 1.82 2.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RICKMSGSBATRA
RICK 1.00 0.03 0.28
MSGS 0.03 1.00 0.22
BATRA 0.28 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RICK, MSGS and BATRA?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) $215.57M, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $7.35B, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) $3.49B.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) +1.0%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +6.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) has the highest net margin (Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) -1.5%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -8.6%). On return on invested capital, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) leads (Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) 0.0%, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) +9.6%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +34.4%, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +28.0%. Over five years, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) compounded fastest (Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) -16.1%/yr, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +10.2%/yr, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +12.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) 1.10%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.00%. Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) and Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) has been the steadiest (Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) 41.9%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 37.8%, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) 19.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RICK, MSGS and BATRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.