RHI vs TBI vs AMN Stock Comparison

Robert Half, TrueBlue and Amn Healthcare Services Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RHI Robert Half Inc.
$41.96 +13.8% 1M +43.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.30B
P/E
36.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29B
Div. yield
5.62%
Staffing Industrials
2 wins
TBI TrueBlue, Inc.
$9.68 +2.5% 1M +64.3% 1Y
Market cap
$294.70M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.69B
Div. yield
–
Staffing Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Amn Healthcare Services leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Amn Healthcare Services 8, Robert Half 2, TrueBlue 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRHITBIAMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.30B $294.70M $1.81B RHI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.5x -5.2x 17.4x AMN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.1x — 14.7x AMN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.9% +10.2% +24.0% AMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% -3.3% 3.1% AMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -14.6% 8.7% AMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.9x 1.1x TBI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.62% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +43.2% +64.3% +122.5% AMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.9%/yr -19.5%/yr -14.0%/yr AMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.0% 70.9% 64.2% RHI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 28/100 68/100 AMN

Percentile Scorecard

RHITBIAMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRHITBIAMN
Valuation 50 #57 of 112 31 #78 of 112 95 #7 of 112
Growth 2 #94 of 96 4 #92 of 96 57 #42 of 96
Profitability 50 #46 of 91 26 #68 of 91 66 #32 of 91
Financial Health 48 #66 of 125 69 #40 of 125 54 #58 of 125
Shareholder Returns 74 #18 of 67 12 #59 of 67 –
Overall 45 28 68
  • RHI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • TBI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • AMN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRHITBIAMNSPY
1 month +13.8%+2.5%+35.1% -0.2%
3 months +6.4%+25.4%+34.9% +3.9%
6 months +52.5%+102.9%+123.4% +8.2%
Year to date +54.5%+112.7%+196.6% +12.9%
1 year +43.2%+64.3%+122.5% +12.3%
3 years -42.5%-10.5%-38.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -16.9%-3.6%-14.9% +23.3%
5 years -62.7%-66.1%-52.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -17.9%-19.5%-14.0% +10.9%
10 years +14.1%-42.2%+47.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +1.3%-5.3%+3.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRHITBIAMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.0%70.9%64.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.1%59.4%55.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.010.560.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.700.911.91 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.4%-89.0%-88.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.6%-10.8%-4.7% -1.2%
52-week high $45.90$10.85$49.05 $779.14
52-week low $21.86$3.31$15.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRHITBIAMN
P/E now vs peer median 36.5xmedian 21.2x -5.2xmedian 21.2x 17.4xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.2xmedian 0.9x 0.5xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 45.9xmedian 11.9x -17.4xmedian 11.9x 6.3xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.0xmedian 13.7x -4.4xmedian 13.7x 4.1xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.4x 1.2xmedian 2.4x 2.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.93median 1.00 0.07median 1.00 -0.56median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRHITBIAMN
Revenue $5.29B $1.69B $3.43B
Gross profit $1.95B $358.54M $954.26M
Operating income $10.65M -$48.58M $199.82M
Net income $114.78M -$56.62M $104.92M
Free cash flow $215.06M -$67.44M $439.13M
EPS (diluted) $1.14 $-1.86 $2.64
Cash & equivalents $324.71M $23.25M $361.84M
Total debt – $82.40M $3.10B
Shares (diluted) 100.31M 30.41M 39.73M
Enterprise value $2.86B $202.91M $800.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRHITBIAMN
P/E 36.5x -5.2x 17.4x
P/FCF 20.0x -4.4x 4.1x
P/Operating cash flow 16.8x -5.4x 3.8x
P/S 0.8x 0.2x 0.5x
P/B 3.6x 1.2x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 1.2x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 45.9x -17.4x 6.3x
EV/EBIT 372.8x -7.3x 11.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.2x 0.6x
EV/FCF 18.5x -5.2x 5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.5x -6.5x 4.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.93 0.07 -0.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRHITBIAMN
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.9% 10.2% 24.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.5% -6.6% -7.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -8.0% -6.3% 15.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.0% -13.7% -13.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -93.6% -41.3% 168.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -74.8% -66.7% -25.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -35.5% -67.3% 135.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -40.4% -76.6% -31.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -35.4% -64.2% 134.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -39.2% -77.3% -31.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -25.6% -56.1% 51.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.4% -37.8% 0.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -24.5% -23.3% 71.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.0% -47.5% 4.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRHITBIAMN
Gross margin 36.8% 21.2% 27.8%
EBITDA margin 1.6% -1.2% 10.1%
Operating margin 0.2% -2.9% 5.8%
Pretax margin 3.5% -3.2% 4.8%
Net margin 2.2% -3.3% 3.1%
FCF margin 4.1% -4.0% 12.8%
Operating cash flow margin 4.8% -3.2% 13.7%
Return on equity 9.4% -22.2% 14.4%
Return on assets 4.1% -9.1% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – -14.6% 8.7%
Return on capital employed 0.8% -10.1% 11.7%
Asset turnover 1.9x 2.7x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 1.0x 4.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 0.4% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRHITBIAMN
Debt / assets – 13.2% 31.4%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.9x 1.1x
Debt / FCF – -1.2x 1.7x
Liabilities / assets 57.8% 59.1% 68.6%
Equity / assets 42.2% 40.9% 31.4%
Interest coverage – – 5.6x
Current ratio 1.5x 2.3x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 2.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 3.90 3.22

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRHITBIAMN
Dividend yield 5.6% – –
Net buyback yield 0.6% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 6.3% -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRHITBIAMN
Forward P/E 31.1xFY2026 – 14.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.35FY2026 $-0.02FY2026 $3.18FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.5%FY2026 – +133.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +49.6% – -69.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.51BFY2026 $1.63BFY2026 $3.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.5%FY2026 +0.5%FY2026 +28.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.5% +4.2% -28.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRHITBIAMN
Held by institutions 100.0% 85.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 443 115 286
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% +0.6% +8.0%
Institutions buying 269 61 182
Institutions selling 117 37 76
Buyers to sellers 2.30 1.65 2.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RHITBIAMN
RHI 1.00 0.33 0.26
TBI 0.33 1.00 0.09
AMN 0.26 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RHI, TBI and AMN?

Robert Half (RHI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Robert Half (RHI) $4.30B, TrueBlue (TBI) $294.70M, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) $1.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, RHI, TBI and AMN?

Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Robert Half (RHI) 36.5x, TrueBlue (TBI) -5.2x, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) 17.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) is cheapest (Robert Half (RHI) 31.1x, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Robert Half (RHI) -4.9%, TrueBlue (TBI) +10.2%, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) +24.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) has the highest net margin (Robert Half (RHI) 2.2%, TrueBlue (TBI) -3.3%, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) leads (TrueBlue (TBI) -14.6%, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) returned the most: Robert Half (RHI) +43.2%, TrueBlue (TBI) +64.3%, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) +122.5%. Over five years, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) compounded fastest (Robert Half (RHI) -17.9%/yr, TrueBlue (TBI) -19.5%/yr, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) -14.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Robert Half (RHI) 5.62%. TrueBlue (TBI) and Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Robert Half (RHI) has been the steadiest (Robert Half (RHI) 62.0%, TrueBlue (TBI) 70.9%, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) 64.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RHI, TBI and AMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amn Healthcare Services (AMN) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.