RGLD vs LU vs UPBD Stock Comparison

Royal Gold, Lufax Holding and Upbound Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RGLD Royal Gold Inc
$239.66 -5.1% 1M +35.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.55B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
8 wins
LU Lufax Holding Ltd
$8.49 +584.7% 1M +156.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.86B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
1 win
UPBD Upbound Group, Inc.
$16.95 +5.3% 1M -27.2% 1Y
Market cap
$976.67M
P/E
10.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.74B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Royal Gold leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Royal Gold 8, Upbound 2, Lufax Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGLDLUUPBDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.23B $6.86B $976.67M RGLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.4x -15.6x 10.8x UPBD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.1x — 3.9x UPBD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +93.5% +7.7% +5.9% RGLD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 47.7% -34.1% 1.9% RGLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.7% -1.1% 7.8% RGLD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x — 0.8x RGLD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +35.0% +156.5% -27.2% LU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.7%/yr -19.8%/yr -20.6%/yr RGLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.1% 235.4% 45.0% RGLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 33/100 63/100 RGLD

Percentile Scorecard

RGLDLUUPBD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGLDLUUPBD
Valuation 19 #138 of 169 41 #100 of 169 96 #8 of 169
Growth 92 #14 of 160 26 #118 of 160 71 #47 of 160
Profitability 95 #9 of 149 24 #114 of 149 62 #57 of 149
Financial Health 92 #13 of 158 40 #95 of 158 53 #75 of 158
Shareholder Returns 43 #78 of 136 – 31 #94 of 136
Overall 68 33 63
  • RGLD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • LU ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UPBD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGLDLUUPBDSPY
1 month -5.1%+584.7%+5.3% -0.2%
3 months +22.2%+447.7%-21.5% +3.9%
6 months +1.2%+346.8%-11.1% +8.2%
Year to date +7.8%+231.6%-3.5% +12.9%
1 year +35.0%+156.5%-27.2% +12.3%
3 years +124.9%+123.4%-32.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +31.0%+30.8%-12.5% +23.3%
5 years +135.8%-66.9%-68.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +18.7%-19.8%-20.6% +10.9%
10 years +260.0%—+74.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.7%—+5.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRGLDLUUPBDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.1%235.4%45.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.4%59.0%46.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.490.071.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.850.66-0.60 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.9%-97.2%-72.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.2%-0.1%-28.2% -1.2%
52-week high $304.29$8.50$23.60 $779.14
52-week low $169.08$0.83$15.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGLDLUUPBD
P/E now vs peer median 27.5xmedian 11.1x -16.8xmedian 11.1x 10.9xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 2.6x 5.7xmedian 2.6x 0.2xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 13.5x —median 13.5x 1.4xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34,688xmedian 7.0x 9.8xmedian 7.0x 2.8xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.78median 0.32 0.38median 0.32 0.04median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGLDLUUPBD
Revenue $1.55B $1.29B $4.74B
Gross profit $1.34B – $2.33B
Operating income $950.24M – $241.70M
Net income $739.81M -$381.02M $90.34M
Free cash flow $585.00K $747.06M $355.95M
EPS (diluted) $8.68 $-0.51 $1.54
Cash & equivalents $182.47M – $105.30M
Total debt $395.89M $9.62B $5.98B
Shares (diluted) 85.05M 866.69M 58.71M
Enterprise value $19.41B $1.18B $545.41M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGLDLUUPBD
P/E 27.5x -16.8x 10.9x
P/FCF 34,688x 9.8x 2.8x
P/Operating cash flow 19.4x 9.8x 2.3x
P/S 13.1x 5.7x 0.2x
P/B 2.7x 0.6x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 0.6x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 16.4x – 1.4x
EV/EBIT 21.6x -60.5x 9.5x
EV/Revenue 13.3x 12.3x 0.5x
EV/FCF 35,053x 21.2x 6.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.6x 21.2x 5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.78 0.38 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGLDLUUPBD
Revenue growth (1Y) 93.5% 7.7% 5.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 36.5% -41.4% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 92.3% – 8.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 37.9% – 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 83.7% – -7.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 48.0% – 23.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 64.5% 18.8% -11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 47.6% -47.3% 303.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.1% 31.9% -11.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.5% -43.7% 295.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 84.2% 19.6% 94.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.3% -25.2% 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -99.8% 19.6% 123.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.0% -25.2% 9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGLDLUUPBD
Gross margin 86.9% – 49.1%
EBITDA margin 80.8% – 35.5%
Operating margin 61.4% – 5.1%
Pretax margin 58.8% -20.4% 2.7%
Net margin 47.7% -34.1% 1.9%
FCF margin 0.0% 58.1% 7.5%
Operating cash flow margin 67.5% 58.1% 9.0%
Return on equity 9.9% -3.3% 12.5%
Return on assets 7.9% -1.3% 2.9%
Return on invested capital 9.7% -1.1% 7.8%
Return on capital employed 10.2% – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.0x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x -2.0x 4.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGLDLUUPBD
Debt / assets 4.2% 32.3% 45.9%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.8x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x – 0.8x
Debt / FCF 676.7x 12.9x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 19.2% 59.8% 76.4%
Equity / assets 80.8% 40.2% 23.6%
Interest coverage 19.2x -707.1x 2.2x
Current ratio 2.9x – –
Quick ratio 2.5x – –
Cash ratio 1.4x – –
Altman Z-score 7.48 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGLDLUUPBD
Dividend yield 0.8% – 9.2%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 0.0% 9.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 18.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23,897% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 25.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 13.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGLDLUUPBD
Forward P/E 22.1xFY2026 – 3.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.85FY2026 $-3.19FY2026 $4.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +48.0%FY2026 – +5.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +24.1% – +8.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.96BFY2026 $4.01BFY2026 $5.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +90.4%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.5% -9.3% -4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGLDLUUPBD
Held by institutions 83.5% 8.1% 99.3%
Institutions holding 762 75 256
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% -12.0% +3.3%
Institutions buying 378 31 146
Institutions selling 264 29 69
Buyers to sellers 1.43 1.07 2.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGLDLUUPBD
RGLD 1.00 -0.07 0.10
LU -0.07 1.00 -0.04
UPBD 0.10 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGLD, LU and UPBD?

Royal Gold (RGLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Royal Gold (RGLD) $20.23B, Lufax Holding (LU) $6.86B, Upbound (UPBD) $976.67M.

Which stock is cheaper, RGLD, LU and UPBD?

Upbound (UPBD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Royal Gold (RGLD) 27.4x, Lufax Holding (LU) -15.6x, Upbound (UPBD) 10.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Upbound (UPBD) is cheapest (Royal Gold (RGLD) 22.1x, Upbound (UPBD) 3.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Royal Gold (RGLD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Royal Gold (RGLD) +93.5%, Lufax Holding (LU) +7.7%, Upbound (UPBD) +5.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Royal Gold (RGLD) has the highest net margin (Royal Gold (RGLD) 47.7%, Lufax Holding (LU) -34.1%, Upbound (UPBD) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads (Royal Gold (RGLD) 9.7%, Lufax Holding (LU) -1.1%, Upbound (UPBD) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lufax Holding (LU) returned the most: Royal Gold (RGLD) +35.0%, Lufax Holding (LU) +156.5%, Upbound (UPBD) -27.2%. Over five years, Royal Gold (RGLD) compounded fastest (Royal Gold (RGLD) +18.7%/yr, Lufax Holding (LU) -19.8%/yr, Upbound (UPBD) -20.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Royal Gold (RGLD) 0.01%, Lufax Holding (LU) 0.00%, Upbound (UPBD) 0.00%. Lufax Holding (LU) and Upbound (UPBD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Royal Gold (RGLD) has been the steadiest (Royal Gold (RGLD) 41.1%, Lufax Holding (LU) 235.4%, Upbound (UPBD) 45.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RGLD, LU and UPBD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.