RGC vs TAK vs ABBV Stock Comparison

Regencell Bioscience Holdings, Takeda Pharmaceutical and AbbVie Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABBV AbbVie Inc.
$290.76 +10.4% 1M +29.1% 1Y
Market cap
$513.81B
P/E
81.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$64.39B
Div. yield
2.38%
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
9 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

AbbVie leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (AbbVie 9, Takeda Pharmaceutical 2, Regencell Bioscience Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGCTAKABBVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.40B $63.78B $513.81B ABBV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -290.0x 200.0x 81.5x ABBV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 50.1x 21.7x ABBV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -35.4% +10.4% ABBV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.1% 9.8% ABBV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% 18.7% ABBV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.8x 2.6x ABBV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.55% 2.38% ABBV
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -58.7% +45.5% +29.1% TAK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +81.0%/yr +7.4%/yr +20.5%/yr RGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 142.7% 21.4% 25.9% TAK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 60/100 68/100 ABBV

Percentile Scorecard

RGCTAKABBV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGCTAKABBV
Valuation 38 #388 of 624 97 #22 of 624 95 #32 of 624
Growth – 12 #531 of 601 54 #276 of 601
Profitability – 86 #77 of 541 95 #27 of 541
Financial Health 90 #67 of 647 32 #438 of 647 16 #546 of 647
Shareholder Returns – 74 #93 of 359 82 #66 of 359
Overall – 60 68
  • RGC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • TAK ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ABBV ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGCTAKABBVSPY
1 month +10.6%+8.2%+10.4% +0.7%
3 months +15.5%+16.1%+12.9% +3.7%
6 months -76.5%+20.1%+37.6% +7.1%
Year to date -67.3%+28.5%+27.3% +12.8%
1 year -58.7%+45.5%+29.1% +11.9%
3 years +1,564.6%+50.0%+104.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +155.5%+14.5%+27.0% +22.8%
5 years +1,841.1%+42.9%+153.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +81.0%+7.4%+20.5% +10.9%
10 years —-12.9%+404.8% +262.0%
10 years, per year —-1.4%+17.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRGCTAKABBVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 142.7%21.4%25.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.5%20.0%24.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.500.11-0.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.412.131.12 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.9%-26.4%-24.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -87.0%-1.9%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $52.88$20.43$290.76 $779.14
52-week low $4.78$13.23$197.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGCTAKABBV
P/E now vs peer median -290.0xmedian 17.8x 200.0xmedian 17.8x 81.5xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 2.1xmedian 9.1x 8.0xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.0x 16.5xmedian 15.0x 23.3xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -442.0xmedian 21.7x 14.0xmedian 21.7x 28.2xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 254.8xmedian 2.2x 1.4xmedian 2.2x -86.6xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 -3.44median 0.35 -8.07median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGCTAKABBV
Revenue – $30.00B $64.39B
Gross profit – $19.76B $46.02B
Operating income – $1.13B $16.87B
Net income – $244.16M $6.32B
Free cash flow – $4.55B $18.21B
R&D – $4.51B $9.71B
EPS (diluted) – $0.10 $3.56
Cash & equivalents $14.19M $2.66B $6.57B
Total debt $21.88K $31.49B $70.82B
Shares (diluted) 494.60M 3.15B 1.77B
Enterprise value $3.37B $41.99B $486.97B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGCTAKABBV
P/E -290.0x 200.0x 81.5x
P/FCF -442.0x 14.0x 28.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 11.4x 26.3x
P/S – 2.1x 8.0x
P/B 254.8x 1.4x -86.6x
P/Tangible book 254.8x 2.4x -9.3x
EV/EBITDA – 16.5x 23.3x
EV/EBIT – 79.5x 34.3x
EV/Revenue – 3.0x 9.0x
EV/FCF – 19.8x 31.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 16.0x 29.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -3.44 -8.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGCTAKABBV
Revenue growth (1Y) – -35.4% 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -13.1% 4.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -36.3% 11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -13.3% 6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -76.7% 53.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -43.6% -1.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – -6.2% 67.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -44.1% -10.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -86.9% 67.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -58.1% -10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.2% 1.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% -8.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -31.3% -0.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.4% -9.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGCTAKABBV
Gross margin – 65.9% 71.5%
EBITDA margin – 18.2% 38.5%
Operating margin – 3.8% 26.2%
Pretax margin – 0.3% 13.5%
Net margin – 1.1% 9.8%
FCF margin – 15.2% 28.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 18.7% 30.3%
Return on equity – 0.7% –
Return on assets – 0.3% 4.7%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% 18.7%
Return on capital employed – 1.2% 17.9%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 23.0x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGCTAKABBV
Debt / assets 0.1% 32.5% 52.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.7x -11.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.8x 2.6x
Debt / FCF – 6.9x 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 9.4% 51.4% 104.4%
Equity / assets 90.6% 48.6% -4.4%
Interest coverage – 0.6x –
Current ratio 10.8x 3.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 10.7x 1.8x 0.5x
Cash ratio 10.7x 0.9x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.35 2.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGCTAKABBV
Dividend yield – 1.5% 2.4%
Net buyback yield – 1.0% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.6% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGCTAKABBV
Forward P/E – 50.1xFY2026 21.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.40FY2026 $13.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +5.3%FY2026 +33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +62.5% +25.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $28.27BFY2026 $69.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -0.8%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +11.9% -0.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGCTAKABBV
Held by institutions 0.3% 3.3% 74.9%
Institutions holding 36 379 4,177
Change in shares held, QoQ +117.0% +6.2% +2.6%
Institutions buying 28 213 2,203
Institutions selling 5 98 1,504
Buyers to sellers 5.60 2.17 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGCTAKABBV
RGC 1.00 0.02 -0.02
TAK 0.02 1.00 0.38
ABBV -0.02 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGC, TAK and ABBV?

AbbVie (ABBV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) $3.40B, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) $63.78B, AbbVie (ABBV) $513.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, RGC, TAK and ABBV?

AbbVie (ABBV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -290.0x, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 200.0x, AbbVie (ABBV) 81.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, AbbVie (ABBV) is cheapest (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 50.1x, AbbVie (ABBV) 21.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

AbbVie (ABBV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) -35.4%, AbbVie (ABBV) +10.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

AbbVie (ABBV) has the highest net margin (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 1.1%, AbbVie (ABBV) 9.8%). On return on invested capital, AbbVie (ABBV) leads (Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 0.0%, AbbVie (ABBV) 18.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) returned the most: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -58.7%, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) +45.5%, AbbVie (ABBV) +29.1%. Over five years, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) compounded fastest (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) +81.0%/yr, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) +7.4%/yr, AbbVie (ABBV) +20.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

AbbVie (ABBV) has the highest dividend yield: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 0.00%, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 1.55%, AbbVie (ABBV) 2.38%. Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) has been the steadiest (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 142.7%, Takeda Pharmaceutical (TAK) 21.4%, AbbVie (ABBV) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RGC, TAK and ABBV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, AbbVie (ABBV) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.