RGC vs AZN vs ABBV Stock Comparison

Regencell Bioscience Holdings, Astrazeneca and AbbVie Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AZN Astrazeneca Plc
$169.54 +1.9% 1M +2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$270.24B
P/E
25.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$58.67B
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
6 wins
ABBV AbbVie Inc.
$286.43 +7.5% 1M +25.9% 1Y
Market cap
$511.45B
P/E
81.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$64.39B
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Astrazeneca leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Astrazeneca 6, AbbVie 4, Regencell Bioscience Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGCAZNABBVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.45B $270.24B $511.45B ABBV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -307.3x 25.9x 81.1x AZN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.0x 21.4x AZN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.4% +10.4% ABBV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 17.8% 9.8% AZN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 23.3% 18.7% AZN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.4x 2.6x AZN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.9% +2.6% +25.9% ABBV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +83.2%/yr +6.3%/yr +20.1%/yr RGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 142.6% 27.3% 25.9% ABBV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 71/100 68/100 AZN

Percentile Scorecard

RGCAZNABBV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGCAZNABBV
Valuation 38 #390 of 625 85 #92 of 625 96 #29 of 625
Growth – 70 #183 of 602 54 #275 of 602
Profitability – 94 #34 of 549 95 #29 of 549
Financial Health 90 #67 of 654 36 #418 of 654 15 #554 of 654
Shareholder Returns – 70 #112 of 367 81 #70 of 367
Overall – 71 68
  • RGC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • AZN ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ABBV ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGCAZNABBVSPY
1 month +17.3%+1.9%+7.5% +0.9%
3 months +28.7%-2.2%+8.7% +5.9%
6 months -74.9%-8.5%+40.5% +8.5%
Year to date -65.4%-7.8%+25.4% +13.3%
1 year -57.9%+2.6%+25.9% +12.4%
3 years +1,595.0%+37.0%+106.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year +157.0%+11.1%+27.3% +23.5%
5 years +1,957.2%+35.9%+149.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +83.2%+6.3%+20.1% +11.0%
10 years —+196.4%+397.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+11.5%+17.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRGCAZNABBVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 142.6%27.3%25.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.4%27.1%24.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.490.21-0.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.410.101.00 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.9%-27.9%-24.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -86.3%-19.1%-0.9% -0.9%
52-week high $52.88$209.48$288.96 $779.14
52-week low $4.78$155.60$197.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGCAZNABBV
P/E now vs peer median -307.3xmedian 17.4x 25.2xmedian 17.4x 80.3xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 4.5xmedian 9.1x 7.9xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.1x 14.3xmedian 17.1x 23.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -468.5xmedian 19.0x 24.6xmedian 19.0x 27.8xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 270.1xmedian 2.2x 5.2xmedian 2.2x -85.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 1.31median 0.34 -7.95median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGCAZNABBV
Revenue – $58.67B $64.39B
Gross profit – $50.25B $46.02B
Operating income – $13.97B $16.87B
Net income – $10.45B $6.32B
Free cash flow – $10.67B $18.21B
R&D – $15.07B $9.71B
EPS (diluted) – $6.69 $3.56
Cash & equivalents $14.19M $4.90B $6.57B
Total debt $21.88K $32.35B $70.82B
Shares (diluted) 494.60M 1.56B 1.77B
Enterprise value $3.42B $243.93B $484.57B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGCAZNABBV
P/E -307.3x 25.2x 80.3x
P/FCF -468.5x 24.6x 27.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 19.2x 25.9x
P/S – 4.5x 7.9x
P/B 270.1x 5.2x -85.3x
P/Tangible book 270.1x 20.8x -9.2x
EV/EBITDA – 14.3x 23.0x
EV/EBIT – 20.8x 33.8x
EV/Revenue – 4.9x 8.9x
EV/FCF – 27.2x 31.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 21.2x 29.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.31 -7.95

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGCAZNABBV
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.4% 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% 4.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.3% 11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.1% 6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 23.4% 53.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 23.9% -1.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 25.9% 67.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 19.2% -10.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 26.0% 67.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 19.2% -10.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 2.3% 1.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.7% -8.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -4.5% -0.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% -9.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGCAZNABBV
Gross margin – 85.6% 71.5%
EBITDA margin – 34.6% 38.5%
Operating margin – 23.8% 26.2%
Pretax margin – 21.5% 13.5%
Net margin – 17.8% 9.8%
FCF margin – 18.2% 28.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% 30.3%
Return on equity – 21.4% –
Return on assets – 9.1% 4.7%
Return on invested capital – 23.3% 18.7%
Return on capital employed – 16.8% 17.9%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGCAZNABBV
Debt / assets 0.1% 27.9% 52.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.6x -11.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.4x 2.6x
Debt / FCF – 3.0x 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 9.4% 56.5% 104.4%
Equity / assets 90.6% 43.5% -4.4%
Interest coverage – 15.9x –
Current ratio 10.8x 0.9x 0.8x
Quick ratio 10.7x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio 10.7x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.43 2.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGCAZNABBV
Dividend yield – 1.4% 2.4%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.4% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGCAZNABBV
Forward P/E – 17.0xFY2026 21.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $10.00FY2026 $13.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.2%FY2026 +33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.1% +25.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $59.02BFY2026 $69.55BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.5%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +8.0% -0.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGCAZNABBV
Held by institutions 0.3% 52.1% 74.9%
Institutions holding 36 1,496 4,176
Change in shares held, QoQ +117.2% +7.8% +2.6%
Institutions buying 28 808 2,203
Institutions selling 5 468 1,503
Buyers to sellers 5.60 1.73 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGCAZNABBV
RGC 1.00 0.04 -0.01
AZN 0.04 1.00 0.42
ABBV -0.01 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGC, AZN and ABBV?

AbbVie (ABBV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) $3.45B, Astrazeneca (AZN) $270.24B, AbbVie (ABBV) $511.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, RGC, AZN and ABBV?

Astrazeneca (AZN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -307.3x, Astrazeneca (AZN) 25.9x, AbbVie (ABBV) 81.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Astrazeneca (AZN) is cheapest (Astrazeneca (AZN) 17.0x, AbbVie (ABBV) 21.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

AbbVie (ABBV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Astrazeneca (AZN) +9.4%, AbbVie (ABBV) +10.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Astrazeneca (AZN) has the highest net margin (Astrazeneca (AZN) 17.8%, AbbVie (ABBV) 9.8%). On return on invested capital, Astrazeneca (AZN) leads (Astrazeneca (AZN) 23.3%, AbbVie (ABBV) 18.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year AbbVie (ABBV) returned the most: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -57.9%, Astrazeneca (AZN) +2.6%, AbbVie (ABBV) +25.9%. Over five years, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) compounded fastest (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) +83.2%/yr, Astrazeneca (AZN) +6.3%/yr, AbbVie (ABBV) +20.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, AbbVie (ABBV) has been the steadiest (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 142.6%, Astrazeneca (AZN) 27.3%, AbbVie (ABBV) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RGC, AZN and ABBV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Astrazeneca (AZN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.