RF vs CBSH vs BSAC Stock Comparison

Regions Financial, Commerce Bancshares and Banco Santander Chile Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.60 +3.5% 1M +16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$24.37B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
3.86%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.64 -7.9% 1M +11.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.91B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.68%
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Commerce Bancshares leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Commerce Bancshares 6, Regions Financial 3, Banco Santander Chile 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRFCBSHBSACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.37B $16.10B $14.91B RF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.4x 27.6x 0.0x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.3x 12.3x 11.1x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% +8.6% — CBSH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% 31.3% — CBSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.6% 20.2% — CBSH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 0.0x 0.0x CBSH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.86% 1.97% 4.68% BSAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.4% +10.2% +11.8% RF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.1%/yr -0.4%/yr +11.9%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.4% 18.5% 28.9% CBSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 63/100 33/100 CBSH

Percentile Scorecard

RFCBSHBSAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRFCBSHBSAC
Valuation 33 #63 of 94 11 #84 of 94 16 #79 of 94
Growth 5 #77 of 81 65 #29 of 81 15 #69 of 81
Profitability 56 #38 of 85 96 #4 of 85 –
Financial Health 57 #37 of 84 96 #4 of 84 16 #71 of 84
Shareholder Returns 64 #32 of 87 44 #49 of 87 86 #13 of 87
Overall 43 63 33
  • RF ranked among 99 companies in Banking
  • CBSH ranked among 99 companies in Banking
  • BSAC ranked among 99 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRFCBSHBSACSPY
1 month +3.5%-1.1%-7.9% -0.8%
3 months -7.0%-5.4%-8.2% +3.5%
6 months +1.2%+9.4%-5.3% +7.0%
Year to date +5.5%+6.6%+1.7% +12.2%
1 year +16.4%+10.2%+11.8% +13.0%
3 years +104.1%+48.0%+81.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +26.9%+14.0%+21.9% +23.1%
5 years +22.4%-2.2%+75.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year +4.1%-0.4%+11.9% +11.0%
10 years +166.0%+49.7%+44.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.3%+4.1%+3.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRFCBSHBSACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.4%18.5%28.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.7%19.4%30.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.660.221.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.700.550.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.9%-42.1%-40.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.7%-7.5%-15.5% -1.8%
52-week high $32.40$60.33$37.46 $779.14
52-week low $24.07$47.49$28.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRFCBSHBSAC
P/E now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 13.1x 27.6xmedian 13.1x 0.0xmedian 13.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 8.6xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 6.0x 13.3xmedian 6.0x 0.0xmedian 6.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 12.3x 13.3xmedian 12.3x -483.6xmedian 12.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 3.7xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.21median 1.40 5.53median 1.40 0.00median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRFCBSHBSAC
Revenue $7.62B $1.86B –
Operating income – – $278.26B
Net income $2.23B $590.84M -$1.70T
Free cash flow $1.67B $1.21B –
EPS (diluted) $2.51 $4.04 $1,126.89
Cash & equivalents – – $2.20B
Total debt $7.63B $26.29M $49.65B
Shares (diluted) 857.00M 144.31M 471.12M
Enterprise value $24.44B $15.91B -$10.86T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRFCBSHBSAC
P/E 11.4x 27.6x 0.0x
P/FCF 14.6x 13.3x -483.6x
P/Operating cash flow 13.7x 12.8x –
P/S 3.2x 8.6x 2.8x
P/B 1.3x 3.7x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 3.8x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 13.3x 0.0x
EV/EBIT 6.7x 14.2x 0.2x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 8.6x –
EV/FCF 19.2x 13.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.0x 12.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.21 5.53 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRFCBSHBSAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% 8.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.7% 6.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -85.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 44.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% 5.0% -229.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 5.0% -114.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.6% 0.9% -18.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.2% 5.0% 48.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -33.7% 131.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.7% 36.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% 145.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.9% 44.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRFCBSHBSAC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 64.2% 64.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 37.4% 40.7% –
Net margin 28.2% 31.3% –
FCF margin 21.9% 65.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% 67.7% –
Return on equity 11.8% 13.6% –
Return on assets 1.4% 1.7% 2,022%
Return on invested capital 14.6% 20.2% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRFCBSHBSAC
Debt / assets 4.7% 0.1% 65.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.0x 8.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 0.0x 0.0x
Debt / FCF 4.6x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 88.3% 87.6% 91.8%
Equity / assets 11.7% 12.4% 8.2%
Interest coverage 2.5x 3.0x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – 0.1x
Cash ratio – – 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRFCBSHBSAC
Dividend yield 3.9% 2.0% 4.7%
Net buyback yield 4.7% 2.1% –
Shareholder yield 8.5% 4.1% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 55.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRFCBSHBSAC
Forward P/E 10.3xFY2026 12.3xFY2026 11.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.79FY2026 $4.54FY2026 $2.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.7%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.3% -3.5% +2.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.33BFY2026 $2.10BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.3%FY2026 +19.4%FY2026 -7.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% -4.1% +19.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRFCBSHBSAC
Held by institutions 84.8% 37.7% 4.7%
Institutions holding 1,105 507 157
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +4.8% +1.7%
Institutions buying 559 266 82
Institutions selling 347 144 51
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.85 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RFCBSHBSAC
RF 1.00 0.76 0.31
CBSH 0.76 1.00 0.16
BSAC 0.31 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RF, CBSH and BSAC?

Regions Financial (RF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regions Financial (RF) $24.37B, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) $16.10B, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, RF, CBSH and BSAC?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regions Financial (RF) 11.4x, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 27.6x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Regions Financial (RF) 10.3x, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 12.3x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) +8.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 31.3%). On return on invested capital, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 20.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Regions Financial (RF) returned the most: Regions Financial (RF) +16.4%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) +10.2%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.8%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Regions Financial (RF) +4.1%/yr, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) -0.4%/yr, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) has the highest dividend yield: Regions Financial (RF) 3.86%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 1.97%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 4.68%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) has been the steadiest (Regions Financial (RF) 23.4%, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 18.5%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RF, CBSH and BSAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.