RETO vs RSG vs GFL Stock Comparison

ReTo Eco-Solutions, Republic Services and GFL Environmental Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RSG Republic Services, Inc.
$233.48 +9.6% 1M +7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$72.65B
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.89B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins
GFL GFL Environmental Inc.
$43.57 +5.1% 1M -3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$16.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Solid Waste Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Republic Services leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Republic Services 6, GFL Environmental 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRETORSGGFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.82K $72.65B $16.61B RSG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 33.2x -74.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 31.3x 70.3x RSG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +3.2% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 12.9% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.0% 9.7% RSG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.6x -0.1x GFL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -96.1% +7.2% -3.4% RSG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -87.2%/yr +11.7%/yr +1.2%/yr RSG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 353.7% 20.3% 29.2% RSG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 51/100 57/100 GFL

Percentile Scorecard

RETORSGGFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRETORSGGFL
Valuation 67 #6 of 16 40 #10 of 16 87 #3 of 16
Growth – 39 #9 of 14 15 #12 of 14
Profitability – 100 #1 of 14 39 #9 of 14
Financial Health 80 #4 of 16 27 #12 of 16 87 #3 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 51 57
  • RETO ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • RSG ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRETORSGGFLSPY
1 month +464.3%+9.6%+5.1% +0.9%
3 months -69.4%+6.6%+8.2% +5.9%
6 months -68.7%+12.1%+8.0% +8.5%
Year to date -89.7%+10.2%+1.4% +13.3%
1 year -96.1%+7.2%-3.4% +12.4%
3 years -99.9%+59.9%+54.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year -91.5%+17.0%+15.6% +23.5%
5 years -100.0%+73.5%+5.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -87.2%+11.7%+1.2% +11.0%
10 years —+349.2%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —+16.2%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRETORSGGFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 353.7%20.3%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 243.6%19.0%28.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.23-0.430.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.270.36-0.12 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-23.4%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -96.1%-3.5%-6.3% -0.9%
52-week high $20.40$241.83$46.51 $779.14
52-week low $0.09$197.73$33.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRETORSGGFL
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 31.3x 32.8xmedian 31.3x -71.8xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 3.1x 4.2xmedian 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.3x 16.0xmedian 14.3x 4.9xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 16.9x 26.9xmedian 16.9x 5.6xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.7x 5.9xmedian 2.7x 1.4xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.37 2.59median 2.37 1.01median 2.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRETORSGGFL
Revenue – $16.89B –
Gross profit – $7.09B –
Operating income – $3.37B $1.72B
Net income – $2.19B -$385.60M
Free cash flow – $2.65B $2.88B
EPS (diluted) – $7.10 $-0.59
Cash & equivalents $250.01K $107.00M $296.50M
Total debt $13.30M $14.07B $14.20M
Shares (diluted) 5.97K 307.63M 378.69M
Enterprise value -$4.97M $72.26B $14.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRETORSGGFL
P/E 0.0x 32.8x -71.8x
P/FCF 0.0x 26.9x 5.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 15.7x 9.4x
P/S 0.1x 4.2x 2.3x
P/B 0.0x 5.9x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 6.3x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – 16.0x 4.9x
EV/EBIT – 25.4x 9.2x
EV/Revenue – 5.1x –
EV/FCF – 32.2x 5.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.8x 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.59 1.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRETORSGGFL
Revenue growth (1Y) – 3.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 1.6% -0.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 9.1% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 2.9% -110.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 11.5% -45.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 4.9% -106.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% -70.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.2% 25.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% -1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.6% 11.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.3% 0.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRETORSGGFL
Gross margin – 42.0% –
EBITDA margin – 31.7% –
Operating margin – 19.9% –
Pretax margin – 15.2% –
Net margin – 12.9% –
FCF margin – 15.7% –
Operating cash flow margin – 26.9% –
Return on equity – 18.2% -4.0%
Return on assets – 6.3% -1.5%
Return on invested capital – 11.0% 9.7%
Return on capital employed – 10.9% 7.6%
Asset turnover – 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x -4.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRETORSGGFL
Debt / assets 7.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.2x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.6x -0.1x
Debt / FCF – 5.3x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 22.3% 65.8% 59.0%
Equity / assets 77.7% 34.2% 41.0%
Interest coverage – 5.7x 2.8x
Current ratio 0.2x 0.6x 0.9x
Quick ratio 24,122x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 3.08 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRETORSGGFL
Dividend yield – 1.1% 0.2%
Net buyback yield – 2.1% –
Shareholder yield – 3.2% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 34.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRETORSGGFL
Forward P/E – 31.3xFY2026 70.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $7.45FY2026 $0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +5.9% +27.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $16.61BFY2026 $6.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.1%FY2026 +26.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.6% +22.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRETORSGGFL
Held by institutions – 58.9% 74.8%
Institutions holding – 1,303 323
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.5% +10.3%
Institutions buying – 623 185
Institutions selling – 484 101
Buyers to sellers – 1.29 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RETORSGGFL
RETO 1.00 0.08 0.12
RSG 0.08 1.00 0.41
GFL 0.12 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RETO, RSG and GFL?

Republic Services (RSG) is the largest by market capitalisation: ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) $3.82K, Republic Services (RSG) $72.65B, GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.61B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Republic Services (RSG) returned the most: ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -96.1%, Republic Services (RSG) +7.2%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -3.4%. Over five years, Republic Services (RSG) compounded fastest (ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -87.2%/yr, Republic Services (RSG) +11.7%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 0.00%, Republic Services (RSG) 0.01%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 0.00%. ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) and GFL Environmental (GFL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Republic Services (RSG) has been the steadiest (ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 353.7%, Republic Services (RSG) 20.3%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RETO, RSG and GFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Republic Services (RSG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.