RDNT vs FMS vs USPH Stock Comparison

RadNet, Fresenius Medical Care AG and U S Physical Therapy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RDNT RadNet, Inc.
$70.05 -1.0% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.27B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
2 wins
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.76 +0.4% 1M -16.4% 1Y
Market cap
$13.10B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fresenius Medical Care AG leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fresenius Medical Care AG 5, U S Physical Therapy 4, RadNet 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRDNTFMSUSPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.72B $13.10B $1.32B FMS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -270.9x 12.0x 40.9x FMS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 132.2x 9.6x 30.0x FMS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.9% -47.8% +11.3% RDNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.9% 9.9% 4.0% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 0.2% 9.3% USPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 200.7x 1.5x USPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.0% -16.4% -4.9% USPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.4%/yr -8.0%/yr -2.8%/yr RDNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 31.1% 40.2% FMS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 50/100 59/100 USPH

Percentile Scorecard

RDNTFMSUSPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRDNTFMSUSPH
Valuation 40 #56 of 93 72 #27 of 93 75 #24 of 93
Growth 22 #69 of 88 12 #78 of 88 29 #63 of 88
Profitability 45 #48 of 87 62 #34 of 87 61 #35 of 87
Financial Health 43 #57 of 100 13 #87 of 100 48 #53 of 100
Shareholder Returns 42 #33 of 56 91 #6 of 56 84 #10 of 56
Overall 39 50 59
  • RDNT ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • FMS ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • USPH ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRDNTFMSUSPHSPY
1 month -1.0%+0.4%+4.4% -0.8%
3 months +13.9%-8.5%+15.6% +3.5%
6 months +21.3%+0.6%+21.1% +7.0%
Year to date -1.8%-4.5%+13.5% +12.2%
1 year -16.0%-16.4%-4.9% +13.0%
3 years +175.6%+38.8%+4.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +40.2%+11.6%+1.6% +23.1%
5 years +132.8%-33.9%-13.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +18.4%-8.0%-2.8% +11.0%
10 years +872.9%-43.7%+48.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +25.6%-5.6%+4.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRDNTFMSUSPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%31.1%40.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.4%37.0%45.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.020.200.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.38-0.53-0.12 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.2%-63.9%-54.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.1%-16.3%-2.6% -1.8%
52-week high $84.48$27.20$91.00 $779.14
52-week low $51.87$20.19$59.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRDNTFMSUSPH
P/E now vs peer median -258.1xmedian 25.1x 12.1xmedian 25.1x 41.4xmedian 25.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x 1.6xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.1xmedian 14.5x 205.4xmedian 14.5x 14.8xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.0xmedian 22.4x 6.1xmedian 22.4x 20.6xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 3.1x 0.8xmedian 3.1x 2.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 31.52median 0.66 0.58median 0.66 -32.46median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRDNTFMSUSPH
Revenue $2.27B $11.07B $812.20M
Gross profit $261.62M -$5.62B $151.70M
Operating income $70.78M $879.32M $76.52M
Net income $80.00K $1.38B $49.87M
Free cash flow -$344.77M $2.08B $64.07M
R&D – $180.01M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.27 $1.79 $2.14
Cash & equivalents $726.27M $1.21B $24.89M
Total debt $1.33B $572.99B $173.13M
Shares (diluted) 78.73M 612.52M 15.07M
Enterprise value $2.97B $5.05B $1.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRDNTFMSUSPH
P/E -258.1x 12.1x 41.4x
P/FCF -16.0x 6.1x 20.6x
P/Operating cash flow 17.8x 3.9x 15.9x
P/S 2.4x 1.1x 1.6x
P/B 4.0x 0.8x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 4.8x 0.9x 4.9x
EV/EBITDA 25.1x 205.4x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 86.4x 628.4x 19.2x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 49.9x 1.8x
EV/FCF -17.7x 265.7x 23.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.7x 167.5x 17.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 31.52 0.58 -32.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRDNTFMSUSPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.9% -47.8% 11.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.1% -18.6% 11.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.8% -207.2% 12.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.7% -45.2% 8.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.5% -45.5% -0.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.9% -16.4% 9.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -99.3% 49.8% -6.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -74.7% 18.2% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -35.8% 52.0% -14.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -8.2% 20.9% -1.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.5% 9.3% 15.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 9.3% 6.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,140% -7.7% 5.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -66.2% 4.8% 1.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRDNTFMSUSPH
Gross margin 11.5% -50.7% 18.7%
EBITDA margin 10.7% 24.3% 12.2%
Operating margin 3.1% 7.9% 9.4%
Pretax margin 1.5% 15.8% 8.3%
Net margin -0.9% 9.9% 4.0%
FCF margin -15.2% 18.8% 7.9%
Operating cash flow margin 13.7% 29.8% 10.2%
Return on equity 1.4% 2.7% 10.9%
Return on assets 0.5% 1.2% 4.0%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 0.2% 9.3%
Return on capital employed 2.1% 3.2% 6.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3,876x 2.4x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.6% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRDNTFMSUSPH
Debt / assets 31.5% 1,515% 13.9%
Debt / equity 1.0x 35.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 200.7x 1.5x
Debt / FCF -3.9x 260.4x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 67.0% 56.8% 64.0%
Equity / assets 33.0% 43.2% 36.0%
Interest coverage 1.0x 2.0x 7.1x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.81 1.33 2.11

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRDNTFMSUSPH
Dividend yield – 3.8% 2.1%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 8.5% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% 12.3% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRDNTFMSUSPH
Forward P/E 132.2xFY2026 9.6xFY2026 30.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.53FY2026 $2.37FY2026 $2.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +35.9%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +71.7% +7.6% +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.68BFY2026 $21.50BFY2026 $799.06MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +31.4%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 +2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.2% -0.3% +10.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRDNTFMSUSPH
Held by institutions 100.0% 7.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 328 235 217
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% -2.9% +0.8%
Institutions buying 175 151 98
Institutions selling 110 41 90
Buyers to sellers 1.59 3.68 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RDNTFMSUSPH
RDNT 1.00 0.08 0.23
FMS 0.08 1.00 0.10
USPH 0.23 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RDNT, FMS and USPH?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is the largest by market capitalisation: RadNet (RDNT) $5.72B, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $13.10B, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) $1.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, RDNT, FMS and USPH?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (RadNet (RDNT) -270.9x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 12.0x, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) 40.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is cheapest (RadNet (RDNT) 132.2x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.6x, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) 30.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

RadNet (RDNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: RadNet (RDNT) +18.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) +11.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (RadNet (RDNT) -0.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) leads (RadNet (RDNT) 1.5%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 0.2%, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) 9.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year U S Physical Therapy (USPH) returned the most: RadNet (RDNT) -16.0%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -16.4%, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) -4.9%. Over five years, RadNet (RDNT) compounded fastest (RadNet (RDNT) +18.4%/yr, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -8.0%/yr, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) -2.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has been the steadiest (RadNet (RDNT) 42.1%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%, U S Physical Therapy (USPH) 40.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RDNT, FMS and USPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.