RCKY vs LULU vs TPR Stock Comparison

Rocky Brands, Lululemon Athletica and Tapestry Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RCKY Rocky Brands, Inc.
$51.98 +11.6% 1M +77.5% 1Y
Market cap
$391.45M
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$521.30M
Div. yield
1.24%
Footwear Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
LULU lululemon athletica inc.
$111.77 +19.4% 1M -33.3% 1Y
Market cap
$11.91B
P/E
8.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.09B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
TPR Tapestry, Inc.
$134.13 +14.9% 1M +22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$26.88B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.00B
Div. yield
1.24%
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tapestry leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tapestry 7, Rocky Brands 3, Lululemon Athletica 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRCKYLULUTPRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $391.45M $11.91B $26.88B TPR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x 8.9x 17.9x LULU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.2x 10.9x 17.9x RCKY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.8% +1.7% +14.2% TPR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.6% 12.8% 19.1% TPR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% — 51.3% TPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — 0.6x TPR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.24% — 1.24% RCKY
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +77.5% -33.3% +22.7% RCKY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.4%/yr -24.9%/yr +25.9%/yr TPR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.8% 46.7% 42.7% TPR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 75/100 63/100 LULU

Percentile Scorecard

RCKYLULUTPR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRCKYLULUTPR
Valuation 79 #11 of 48 87 #7 of 48 26 #36 of 48
Growth 67 #16 of 46 27 #34 of 46 89 #6 of 46
Profitability 55 #21 of 45 96 #3 of 45 100 #1 of 45
Financial Health 53 #25 of 52 77 #13 of 52 37 #33 of 52
Shareholder Returns 35 #23 of 35 91 #4 of 35 65 #13 of 35
Overall 58 75 63
  • RCKY ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • LULU ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • TPR ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRCKYLULUTPRSPY
1 month +11.6%+19.4%+14.9% -5.9%
3 months +4.6%-10.4%-17.2% -4.6%
6 months +43.2%-16.3%+2.8% +0.2%
Year to date +77.2%-46.2%+5.0% +7.5%
1 year +77.5%-33.3%+22.7% +8.2%
3 years +136.7%-72.6%+388.5% +68.3%
3 years, per year +33.3%-35.1%+69.7% +19.0%
5 years +24.0%-76.1%+215.5% +56.5%
5 years, per year +4.4%-24.9%+25.9% +9.4%
10 years +395.0%+100.2%+279.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year +17.3%+7.2%+14.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureRCKYLULUTPRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.8%46.7%42.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.0%51.6%47.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.681.060.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.50-0.710.53 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.2%-82.0%-43.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.8%-48.2%-18.6% -5.9%
52-week high $54.60$215.88$164.78 $779.14
52-week low $28.67$91.88$98.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRCKYLULUTPR
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 17.1x 8.9xmedian 17.1x 17.9xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.8x 1.1xmedian 0.8x 3.4xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 10.6x 4.2xmedian 10.6x 13.2xmedian 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 11.6x 8.8xmedian 11.6x 14.8xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.4x 2.5xmedian 2.4x 38.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.23median 0.57 0.54median 0.57 0.77median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRCKYLULUTPR
Revenue $521.30M $11.09B $8.00B
Gross profit $226.46M $6.22B $6.23B
Operating income $51.08M $1.98B $1.91B
Net income $34.50M $1.42B $1.53B
Free cash flow $27.87M $1.35B $1.81B
EPS (diluted) $4.53 $12.56 $7.27
Cash & equivalents $2.29M $1.39B $974.70M
Total debt $116.03M – $2.38B
Shares (diluted) 7.62M 112.92M 210.20M
Enterprise value $381.96M $6.16B $22.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRCKYLULUTPR
P/E 11.3x 8.9x 17.9x
P/FCF 14.0x 8.8x 14.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.9x 6.0x 13.6x
P/S 0.8x 1.1x 3.4x
P/B 1.4x 2.5x 38.8x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 2.5x -1,102x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x 4.2x 13.2x
EV/EBIT 9.9x 5.3x 14.7x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 0.9x 3.5x
EV/FCF 18.1x 7.8x 15.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.1x 5.3x 14.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.23 0.54 0.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRCKYLULUTPR
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.8% 1.7% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 7.9% 6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.5% -3.4% 17.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.1% 7.5% 9.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 41.5% -20.7% 361.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.2% 8.5% 17.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 67.8% -20.6% 733.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 50.0% 12.1% 17.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 66.1% -15.8% 782.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.3% 16.6% 23.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.0% 3.7% 62.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -15.6% 6.6% 26.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 75.2% 15.9% 65.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.6% 11.8% 31.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRCKYLULUTPR
Gross margin 43.4% 56.1% 77.8%
EBITDA margin 11.8% 22.7% 26.6%
Operating margin 9.8% 17.8% 23.9%
Pretax margin 8.2% 18.1% 23.2%
Net margin 6.6% 12.8% 19.1%
FCF margin 5.3% 12.2% 22.6%
Operating cash flow margin 6.9% 17.9% 24.7%
Return on equity 12.8% 29.5% 222.3%
Return on assets 6.9% 16.7% 23.2%
Return on invested capital 10.6% – 51.3%
Return on capital employed 13.1% 29.5% 38.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.3x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.4x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.8% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRCKYLULUTPR
Debt / assets 22.5% – 35.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 3.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – 0.6x
Debt / FCF 4.2x – 1.3x
Liabilities / assets 46.3% 43.5% 89.7%
Equity / assets 53.7% 56.5% 10.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.7x 2.2x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.9x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.8x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 3.31 5.04 4.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRCKYLULUTPR
Dividend yield 1.2% – 1.2%
Net buyback yield 0.1% 9.7% 5.3%
Shareholder yield 1.4% 9.7% 6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRCKYLULUTPR
Forward P/E 9.2xFY2026 10.9xFY2026 17.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $5.63FY2026 $10.26FY2026 $7.49FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +72.7%FY2026 -22.6%FY2026 +6.2%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after -28.6% -16.3% +27.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $562.59MFY2026 $11.00BFY2026 $8.86BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +16.7%FY2026 -0.9%FY2026 +10.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -4.8% -9.7% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRCKYLULUTPR
Held by institutions 80.8% 71.6% 97.4%
Institutions holding 118 850 1,105
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% -2.1% +4.4%
Institutions buying 56 408 604
Institutions selling 37 333 374
Buyers to sellers 1.51 1.23 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RCKYLULUTPR
RCKY 1.00 0.21 0.17
LULU 0.21 1.00 0.23
TPR 0.17 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RCKY, LULU and TPR?

Tapestry (TPR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rocky Brands (RCKY) $391.45M, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) $11.91B, Tapestry (TPR) $26.88B.

Which stock is cheaper, RCKY, LULU and TPR?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rocky Brands (RCKY) 11.3x, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 8.9x, Tapestry (TPR) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Rocky Brands (RCKY) is cheapest (Rocky Brands (RCKY) 9.2x, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 10.9x, Tapestry (TPR) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tapestry (TPR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rocky Brands (RCKY) +10.8%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) +1.7%, Tapestry (TPR) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tapestry (TPR) has the highest net margin (Rocky Brands (RCKY) 6.6%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 12.8%, Tapestry (TPR) 19.1%). On return on invested capital, Tapestry (TPR) leads (Rocky Brands (RCKY) 10.6%, Tapestry (TPR) 51.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rocky Brands (RCKY) returned the most: Rocky Brands (RCKY) +77.5%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) -33.3%, Tapestry (TPR) +22.7%. Over five years, Tapestry (TPR) compounded fastest (Rocky Brands (RCKY) +4.4%/yr, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) -24.9%/yr, Tapestry (TPR) +25.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rocky Brands (RCKY) has the highest dividend yield: Rocky Brands (RCKY) 1.24%, Tapestry (TPR) 1.24%. Lululemon Athletica (LULU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tapestry (TPR) has been the steadiest (Rocky Brands (RCKY) 51.8%, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 46.7%, Tapestry (TPR) 42.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RCKY, LULU and TPR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tapestry (TPR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.