RBA vs TLSS vs LSTR Stock Comparison

Rb Global, Transportation & Logistics Systems and Landstar System Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RBA Rb Global Inc.
$85.01 +3.1% 1M -16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$15.74B
P/E
36.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.85B
Div. yield
1.48%
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$168.78 +3.1% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.73B
P/E
42.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.16%
Logistics Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Rb Global leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Rb Global 5, Transportation & Logistics Systems 2, Landstar System 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRBATLSSLSTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.74B $1.18B $5.73B RBA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.2x 921.6x 42.2x RBA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.4x — 27.4x RBA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.7% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.0% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.48% — 2.16% LSTR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.2% +1,900.0% +30.3% TLSS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.6%/yr +58.5%/yr -0.6%/yr TLSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.8% — 35.1% RBA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 32/100 — RBA

Percentile Scorecard

RBATLSSLSTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRBATLSSLSTR
Valuation 24 #104 of 136 3 #132 of 136 18 #112 of 136
Growth 74 #32 of 121 93 #9 of 121 –
Profitability 43 #66 of 115 – –
Financial Health 49 #74 of 143 0 #143 of 143 –
Shareholder Returns 22 #64 of 82 – 40 #50 of 82
Overall 42 32 –
  • RBA ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TLSS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRBATLSSLSTRSPY
1 month +3.1%+1,900.0%+3.1% -0.2%
3 months -27.1%+1,900.0%-8.9% +3.9%
6 months -19.3%+1,900.0%-7.5% +8.2%
Year to date -17.4%+1,900.0%+17.5% +12.9%
1 year -16.2%+1,900.0%+30.3% +12.3%
3 years +36.6%+1,900.0%+3.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +11.0%+171.6%+1.2% +23.3%
5 years +25.0%+900.0%-2.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +4.6%+58.5%-0.6% +10.9%
10 years +146.8%-97.7%+137.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.5%-31.5%+9.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRBATLSSLSTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.8%—35.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.6%—37.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.79—0.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.48—0.86 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.0%-92.5%-41.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-75.0%-25.1% -1.2%
52-week high $119.14$0.80$225.37 $779.14
52-week low $79.80$0.01$121.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRBATLSSLSTR
P/E now vs peer median 36.2xmedian 16.3x 921.6xmedian 16.3x 42.2xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x 1.1xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x 31.6xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.2x -55.3xmedian 1.2x 6.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.75median 0.82 33.33median 0.82 —median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRBATLSSLSTR
Revenue $4.85B – –
Gross profit $1.18B – –
Operating income $777.60M -$1.30M –
Net income $484.40M $211.13K –
Free cash flow $611.20M – –
EPS (diluted) $2.33 $0.00 –
Cash & equivalents $524.90M $29.08K $297.32M
Total debt $2.90B $175.00K –
Shares (diluted) 186.90M 5.89B 33.94M
Enterprise value $13.34B $1.18B $5.73B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRBATLSSLSTR
P/E 36.2x 921.6x 42.2x
P/FCF 25.7x – 31.6x
P/Operating cash flow 18.3x – –
P/S 3.2x – 1.1x
P/B 2.8x -55.3x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 5.0x -55.3x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 14.0x – –
EV/EBIT 23.3x -904.0x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x – –
EV/FCF 29.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 21.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.75 33.33 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRBATLSSLSTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.7% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -41.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 5.3% 14.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% 28.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 15.9% 128.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.8% 26.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 15.5% 514.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.1% 27.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -9.7% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRBATLSSLSTR
Gross margin 24.3% – –
EBITDA margin 26.6% – –
Operating margin 16.0% – –
Pretax margin 12.5% – –
Net margin 9.0% – –
FCF margin 12.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin 17.8% – –
Return on equity 8.6% – –
Return on assets 3.9% 881.2% –
Return on invested capital 7.4% – –
Return on capital employed 7.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.4x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRBATLSSLSTR
Debt / assets 23.3% 572.2% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – –
Debt / FCF 4.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 55.4% 69,686% –
Equity / assets 44.6% -69,586% 45.9%
Interest coverage 4.3x -18.2x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 2.16 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRBATLSSLSTR
Dividend yield 1.5% – 2.2%
Net buyback yield 0.6% – –
Shareholder yield 2.1% – 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 55.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 43.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRBATLSSLSTR
Forward P/E 20.4xFY2026 – 27.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.17FY2026 $0.00FY2023 $6.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.8%FY2026 – +85.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.1% – +27.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.33BFY2026 $31.69MFY2023 $5.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.7%FY2026 – +15.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.9% +288.2% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRBATLSSLSTR
Held by institutions 96.6% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 556 – 543
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% – -2.8%
Institutions buying 276 – 296
Institutions selling 185 – 153
Buyers to sellers 1.49 – 1.93

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RBATLSSLSTR
RBA 1.00 – 0.35
TLSS – – –
LSTR 0.35 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RBA, TLSS and LSTR?

Rb Global (RBA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rb Global (RBA) $15.74B, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) $1.18B, Landstar System (LSTR) $5.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, RBA, TLSS and LSTR?

Rb Global (RBA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rb Global (RBA) 36.2x, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) 921.6x, Landstar System (LSTR) 42.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Rb Global (RBA) is cheapest (Rb Global (RBA) 20.4x, Landstar System (LSTR) 27.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) returned the most: Rb Global (RBA) -16.2%, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +1,900.0%, Landstar System (LSTR) +30.3%. Over five years, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) compounded fastest (Rb Global (RBA) +4.6%/yr, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +58.5%/yr, Landstar System (LSTR) -0.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Landstar System (LSTR) has the highest dividend yield: Rb Global (RBA) 1.48%, Landstar System (LSTR) 2.16%. Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rb Global (RBA) has been the steadiest (Rb Global (RBA) 33.8%, Landstar System (LSTR) 35.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RBA, TLSS and LSTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rb Global (RBA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.