RBA vs R vs LSTR Stock Comparison

Rb Global, Ryder System and Landstar System Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RBA Rb Global Inc.
$84.69 +2.7% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$15.68B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.85B
Div. yield
1.49%
Logistics Industrials
3 wins
R Ryder System Inc
$282.13 +19.8% 1M +74.9% 1Y
Market cap
$10.78B
P/E
20.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
1.33%
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$165.17 +0.9% 1M +26.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.61B
P/E
42.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.98B
Div. yield
2.20%
Logistics Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 5, Landstar System 4, Rb Global 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRBARLSTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.68B $10.78B $5.61B RBA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.1x 20.8x 42.6x R
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.4x 20.0x 26.9x R
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.7% +3.2% +4.1% RBA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.0% 4.0% 2.6% RBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% -70.6% 15.1% LSTR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x -0.9x -1.3x LSTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.49% 1.33% 2.20% LSTR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.8% +74.9% +26.9% R
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.7%/yr +26.6%/yr -0.7%/yr R
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.9% 32.1% 35.1% R
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 40/100 44/100 LSTR

Percentile Scorecard

RBARLSTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRBARLSTR
Valuation 22 #107 of 136 37 #86 of 136 19 #111 of 136
Growth 74 #32 of 122 61 #48 of 122 10 #110 of 122
Profitability 43 #67 of 116 27 #85 of 116 54 #54 of 116
Financial Health 48 #75 of 144 5 #137 of 144 87 #20 of 144
Shareholder Returns 27 #60 of 82 70 #25 of 82 52 #40 of 82
Overall 43 40 44
  • RBA ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRBARLSTRSPY
1 month +2.7%+19.8%+0.9% -0.8%
3 months -27.2%+5.0%-13.8% +3.5%
6 months -21.4%+13.1%-8.3% +7.0%
Year to date -17.7%+47.4%+14.9% +12.2%
1 year -16.8%+74.9%+26.9% +13.0%
3 years +36.1%+205.4%+1.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.8%+45.1%+0.5% +23.1%
5 years +25.8%+224.6%-3.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +4.7%+26.6%-0.7% +11.0%
10 years +145.1%+307.6%+133.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.4%+15.1%+8.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRBARLSTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.9%32.1%35.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.6%29.1%37.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.791.030.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.502.330.77 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.0%-28.8%-41.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.9%0.0%-26.7% -1.8%
52-week high $119.14$282.13$225.37 $779.14
52-week low $79.80$162.50$121.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRBARLSTR
P/E now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 16.1x 20.8xmedian 16.1x 42.6xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 1.0x 0.8xmedian 1.0x 1.1xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 8.7x -2.2xmedian 8.7x 24.4xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.6xmedian 11.5x 11.3xmedian 11.5x 31.9xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.2x 3.6xmedian 1.2x 6.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.75median 0.81 2.49median 0.81 -1.66median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRBARLSTR
Revenue $4.85B $13.08B $4.98B
Gross profit $1.18B $2.56B –
Operating income $777.60M -$9.81B $175.34M
Net income $484.40M $520.00M $131.70M
Free cash flow $611.20M $954.00M $175.65M
EPS (diluted) $2.33 $13.41 $3.88
Cash & equivalents $524.90M $198.00M $294.35M
Total debt $2.90B $30.21B $230.93M
Shares (diluted) 186.90M 38.79M 33.94M
Enterprise value $13.28B $9.99B $3.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRBARLSTR
P/E 36.1x 20.8x 42.6x
P/FCF 25.6x 11.3x 31.9x
P/Operating cash flow 18.2x 3.9x 29.5x
P/S 3.2x 0.8x 1.1x
P/B 2.8x 3.6x 6.7x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 4.1x 6.7x
EV/EBITDA 14.0x -2.2x 24.4x
EV/EBIT 23.2x -1.8x 30.4x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 1.4x 1.1x
EV/FCF 29.5x 18.6x 30.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.0x 6.5x 28.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.75 2.49 -1.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRBARLSTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.7% 3.2% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.1% 3.4% -7.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -41.7% -0.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 3.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 5.3% -4.2% -19.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% -3.7% -26.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 15.9% 3.6% -21.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.8% 2.1% -27.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.5% 11.2% -19.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.1% 8.3% -25.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -9.7% 13.8% -8.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.8% 4.9% -32.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.2% 1,184% -6.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.3% 47.1% -32.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRBARLSTR
Gross margin 24.3% 19.6% –
EBITDA margin 26.6% -61.9% 4.4%
Operating margin 16.0% -75.0% 3.5%
Pretax margin 12.5% 5.4% 3.5%
Net margin 9.0% 4.0% 2.6%
FCF margin 12.6% 7.3% 3.5%
Operating cash flow margin 17.8% 20.9% 3.8%
Return on equity 8.6% 17.8% 16.1%
Return on assets 3.9% 3.2% 7.9%
Return on invested capital 7.4% -70.6% 15.1%
Return on capital employed 7.1% -80.1% 18.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 5.3x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRBARLSTR
Debt / assets 23.3% 44.6% 4.1%
Debt / equity 0.5x 2.4x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x -0.9x -1.3x
Debt / FCF 4.8x 7.6x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 55.4% 81.6% 52.0%
Equity / assets 44.6% 18.4% 48.0%
Interest coverage 4.3x -25.2x 98.1x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.7x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.6x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.15 -0.58 9.66

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRBARLSTR
Dividend yield 1.5% 1.3% 2.2%
Net buyback yield 0.6% 5.1% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 6.4% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 55.0% 28.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 43.6% 15.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.3% 5.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 6.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRBARLSTR
Forward P/E 20.4xFY2026 20.0xFY2026 26.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.15FY2026 $14.12FY2026 $6.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 +9.3%FY2026 +85.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.4% +29.3% +27.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.31BFY2026 $14.00BFY2026 $5.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.2%FY2026 +10.6%FY2026 +15.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.9% +1.9% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRBARLSTR
Held by institutions 96.6% 90.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 556 579 543
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% -0.6% -2.8%
Institutions buying 276 309 296
Institutions selling 185 177 153
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.75 1.93

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RBARLSTR
RBA 1.00 0.31 0.35
R 0.31 1.00 0.49
LSTR 0.35 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RBA, R and LSTR?

Rb Global (RBA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rb Global (RBA) $15.68B, Ryder System (R) $10.78B, Landstar System (LSTR) $5.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, RBA, R and LSTR?

Ryder System (R) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rb Global (RBA) 36.1x, Ryder System (R) 20.8x, Landstar System (LSTR) 42.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ryder System (R) is cheapest (Rb Global (RBA) 20.4x, Ryder System (R) 20.0x, Landstar System (LSTR) 26.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rb Global (RBA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rb Global (RBA) +9.7%, Ryder System (R) +3.2%, Landstar System (LSTR) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rb Global (RBA) has the highest net margin (Rb Global (RBA) 9.0%, Ryder System (R) 4.0%, Landstar System (LSTR) 2.6%). On return on invested capital, Landstar System (LSTR) leads (Rb Global (RBA) 7.4%, Ryder System (R) -70.6%, Landstar System (LSTR) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ryder System (R) returned the most: Rb Global (RBA) -16.8%, Ryder System (R) +74.9%, Landstar System (LSTR) +26.9%. Over five years, Ryder System (R) compounded fastest (Rb Global (RBA) +4.7%/yr, Ryder System (R) +26.6%/yr, Landstar System (LSTR) -0.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Landstar System (LSTR) has the highest dividend yield: Rb Global (RBA) 1.49%, Ryder System (R) 1.33%, Landstar System (LSTR) 2.20%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryder System (R) has been the steadiest (Rb Global (RBA) 33.9%, Ryder System (R) 32.1%, Landstar System (LSTR) 35.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RBA, R and LSTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.