RBA vs EXPD vs R Stock Comparison

Rb Global, Expeditors International Of Washington and Ryder System Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RBA Rb Global Inc.
$84.17 +1.6% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$15.76B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.85B
Div. yield
0.02%
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
R Ryder System Inc
$270.59 +13.7% 1M +68.9% 1Y
Market cap
$10.76B
P/E
20.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
0.01%
Logistics Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 5, Rb Global 5, Expeditors International Of Washington 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRBAEXPDRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.76B $25.70B $10.76B EXPD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.1x 28.0x 20.7x R
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.4x 26.6x 19.2x R
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.7% +6.8% +3.2% RBA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.0% 7.6% 4.0% RBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% — -70.6% RBA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — -0.9x R
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.01% 0.01% RBA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.3% +65.6% +68.9% R
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.5%/yr +9.8%/yr +24.9%/yr R
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.8% 30.9% 32.1% EXPD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 43/100 41/100 RBA

Percentile Scorecard

RBAEXPDR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRBAEXPDR
Valuation 22 #106 of 136 15 #116 of 136 38 #85 of 136
Growth 74 #32 of 122 36 #79 of 122 62 #47 of 122
Profitability 45 #66 of 119 64 #44 of 119 27 #87 of 119
Financial Health 48 #77 of 147 60 #59 of 147 5 #140 of 147
Shareholder Returns 31 #58 of 84 42 #49 of 84 72 #24 of 84
Overall 44 43 41
  • RBA ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • EXPD ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRBAEXPDRSPY
1 month +1.6%+4.4%+13.7% -1.0%
3 months -24.6%+12.0%+1.2% +2.9%
6 months -21.2%+33.0%+6.8% +6.4%
Year to date -18.2%+31.7%+41.4% +11.4%
1 year -17.3%+65.6%+68.9% +13.1%
3 years +32.9%+74.9%+176.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +9.9%+20.5%+40.3% +21.5%
5 years +24.6%+59.5%+204.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +4.5%+9.8%+24.9% +10.9%
10 years +138.3%+294.0%+320.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +9.1%+14.7%+15.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureRBAEXPDRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.8%30.9%32.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.3%33.0%29.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.780.491.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.512.122.15 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.0%-36.0%-31.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.4%-1.2%-3.5% -2.5%
52-week high $119.14$198.58$280.34 $779.14
52-week low $79.80$117.57$160.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRBAEXPDR
P/E now vs peer median 35.8xmedian 16.0x 28.0xmedian 16.0x 19.9xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 1.0x 2.1xmedian 1.0x 0.8xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 8.7x 19.8xmedian 8.7x -2.1xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.5xmedian 11.5x 27.6xmedian 11.5x 10.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.2x 12.0xmedian 1.2x 3.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.75median 0.82 238.75median 0.82 2.39median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRBAEXPDR
Revenue $4.85B $12.04B $13.08B
Gross profit $1.18B $3.94B $2.56B
Operating income $777.60M $1.18B -$9.81B
Net income $484.40M $921.33M $520.00M
Free cash flow $611.20M $923.86M $954.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.33 $6.99 $13.41
Cash & equivalents $524.90M $1.03B $198.00M
Total debt $2.90B – $30.21B
Shares (diluted) 186.90M 131.37M 38.79M
Enterprise value $13.36B $20.84B $9.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRBAEXPDR
P/E 35.8x 28.0x 19.9x
P/FCF 25.5x 27.6x 10.8x
P/Operating cash flow 18.1x 26.2x 3.8x
P/S 3.2x 2.1x 0.8x
P/B 2.8x 12.0x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 12.0x 4.0x
EV/EBITDA 13.9x 19.8x -2.1x
EV/EBIT 23.1x 20.7x -1.8x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 2.0x 1.3x
EV/FCF 29.4x 26.5x 18.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.9x 25.2x 6.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.75 238.75 2.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRBAEXPDR
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.7% 6.8% 3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.1% -1.6% 3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -41.7% 8.5% -0.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 0.5% 3.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 5.3% 6.0% -4.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% -5.0% -3.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 15.9% 7.9% 3.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 48.8% -4.3% 2.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.5% 12.0% 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.1% 0.1% 8.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -9.7% 12.9% 13.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.8% -19.5% 4.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.2% 14.0% 1,184%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.3% -20.0% 47.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRBAEXPDR
Gross margin 24.3% 32.7% 19.6%
EBITDA margin 26.6% 10.3% -61.9%
Operating margin 16.0% 9.8% -75.0%
Pretax margin 12.5% 10.2% 5.4%
Net margin 9.0% 7.6% 4.0%
FCF margin 12.6% 7.7% 7.3%
Operating cash flow margin 17.8% 8.1% 20.9%
Return on equity 8.6% 41.8% 17.8%
Return on assets 3.9% 18.6% 3.2%
Return on invested capital 7.4% – -70.6%
Return on capital employed 7.1% 49.3% -80.1%
Asset turnover 0.4x 2.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.1x 5.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRBAEXPDR
Debt / assets 23.3% – 44.6%
Debt / equity 0.5x – 2.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – -0.9x
Debt / FCF 4.8x – 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 55.4% 58.7% 81.6%
Equity / assets 44.6% 41.3% 18.4%
Interest coverage 4.3x – -25.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.6x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.14 9.15 -0.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRBAEXPDR
Dividend yield 1.5% 0.8% 1.4%
Net buyback yield 0.7% 3.2% 5.3%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 4.0% 6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 55.0% 34.0% 28.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) 43.6% 33.9% 15.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.3% 1.6% 5.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -0.3% 6.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRBAEXPDR
Forward P/E 20.4xFY2026 26.6xFY2026 19.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.12FY2026 $7.38FY2026 $14.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.5%FY2026 +24.0%FY2026 +9.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.1% +6.9% +29.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.27BFY2026 $12.65BFY2026 $14.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +14.3%FY2026 +10.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.0% +10.2% +1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRBAEXPDR
Held by institutions 96.6% 96.4% 90.8%
Institutions holding 556 959 579
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% -0.7% -0.6%
Institutions buying 276 448 309
Institutions selling 185 356 177
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.26 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RBAEXPDR
RBA 1.00 0.30 0.31
EXPD 0.30 1.00 0.32
R 0.31 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RBA, EXPD and R?

Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rb Global (RBA) $15.76B, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) $25.70B, Ryder System (R) $10.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, RBA, EXPD and R?

Ryder System (R) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rb Global (RBA) 36.1x, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) 28.0x, Ryder System (R) 20.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ryder System (R) is cheapest (Rb Global (RBA) 20.4x, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) 26.6x, Ryder System (R) 19.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rb Global (RBA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rb Global (RBA) +9.7%, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) +6.8%, Ryder System (R) +3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rb Global (RBA) has the highest net margin (Rb Global (RBA) 9.0%, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) 7.6%, Ryder System (R) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, Rb Global (RBA) leads (Rb Global (RBA) 7.4%, Ryder System (R) -70.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ryder System (R) returned the most: Rb Global (RBA) -17.3%, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) +65.6%, Ryder System (R) +68.9%. Over five years, Ryder System (R) compounded fastest (Rb Global (RBA) +4.5%/yr, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) +9.8%/yr, Ryder System (R) +24.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rb Global (RBA) has the highest dividend yield: Rb Global (RBA) 0.02%, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) 0.01%, Ryder System (R) 0.01%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) has been the steadiest (Rb Global (RBA) 33.8%, Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) 30.9%, Ryder System (R) 32.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RBA, EXPD and R?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.