R vs SMID vs URI Stock Comparison

Ryder System, Smith Midland and United Rentals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
R Ryder System Inc
$282.13 +19.8% 1M +74.9% 1Y
Market cap
$10.78B
P/E
20.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
0.01%
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
SMID Smith Midland Corp
$21.20 -12.7% 1M -47.1% 1Y
Market cap
$112.32M
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.50M
Div. yield
–
Building Products Industrials
2 wins
URI United Rentals, Inc.
$1,122.70 +7.3% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$73.00B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.50B
Div. yield
–
Equipment Rental Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 5, United Rentals 4, Smith Midland 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRSMIDURILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.78B $112.32M $73.00B URI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.7x 14.5x 25.6x SMID
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.5x — 20.3x R
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.2% -1.6% +9.4% URI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% 8.6% 16.3% URI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -70.6% 12.8% 14.0% URI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x -0.5x 2.3x R
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +74.9% -47.1% +22.9% R
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +26.6%/yr +3.4%/yr +26.5%/yr R
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.1% 51.1% 42.2% R
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 81/100 58/100 SMID

Percentile Scorecard

RSMIDURI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRSMIDURI
Valuation 37 #86 of 136 86 #9 of 56 27 #34 of 46
Growth 61 #48 of 122 78 #12 of 52 90 #5 of 39
Profitability 27 #85 of 116 66 #18 of 51 92 #4 of 40
Financial Health 5 #137 of 144 93 #5 of 58 19 #40 of 49
Shareholder Returns 70 #25 of 82 – 61 #13 of 32
Overall 40 81 58
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • SMID ranked among 60 companies in Construction Products
  • URI ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRSMIDURISPY
1 month +19.8%-12.7%+7.3% -0.8%
3 months +5.0%-31.5%-0.4% +3.5%
6 months +13.1%-36.7%+17.0% +7.0%
Year to date +47.4%-41.7%+38.7% +12.2%
1 year +74.9%-47.1%+22.9% +13.0%
3 years +205.4%+9.4%+181.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +45.1%+3.1%+41.2% +23.1%
5 years +224.6%+18.4%+223.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +26.6%+3.4%+26.5% +11.0%
10 years +307.6%+480.8%+1,373.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +15.1%+19.2%+30.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRSMIDURISPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.1%51.1%42.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.1%51.4%39.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.030.981.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.33-0.920.54 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.8%-72.4%-40.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-46.8%-3.7% -1.8%
52-week high $282.13$39.82$1,165.29 $779.14
52-week low $162.50$21.20$710.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRSMIDURI
P/E now vs peer median 20.8xmedian 16.1x 14.6xmedian 19.4x 24.4xmedian 25.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.0x 1.3xmedian 1.5x 4.0xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 8.7x 7.4xmedian 12.1x 13.3xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 11.5x 27.0xmedian 16.1x 78.0xmedian 21.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.2x 2.0xmedian 2.9x 7.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.49median 0.81 0.11median 0.93 2.56median 2.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRSMIDURI
Revenue $13.08B $89.50M $17.50B
Gross profit $2.56B $21.00M $6.84B
Operating income -$9.81B $10.80M $4.47B
Net income $520.00M $7.73M $2.86B
Free cash flow $954.00M $4.17M $892.00M
EPS (diluted) $13.41 $1.46 $45.89
Cash & equivalents $198.00M $10.66M $153.00M
Total debt $30.21B $17.45M $14.67B
Shares (diluted) 38.79M 5.31M 62.26M
Enterprise value $9.98B $63.18M $72.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRSMIDURI
P/E 20.8x 14.6x 24.4x
P/FCF 11.3x 27.0x 78.0x
P/Operating cash flow 3.9x 7.7x 11.2x
P/S 0.8x 1.3x 4.0x
P/B 3.6x 2.0x 7.2x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 3.5x 7.6x
EV/EBITDA -2.2x 7.4x 13.3x
EV/EBIT -1.8x 9.8x 18.8x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 1.2x 4.8x
EV/FCF 18.6x 25.4x 94.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.5x 7.3x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.49 0.11 2.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRSMIDURI
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.2% -1.6% 9.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 18.4% 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.4% -18.4% 10.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 35.0% 6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -4.2% -30.8% 11.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.7% 134.1% 5.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 3.6% -49.1% 12.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 136.0% 6.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.2% -35.9% 16.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 135.4% 9.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.8% 92.5% 24.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 97.2% 10.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1,184% 459.8% 98.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.1% 38.5% 83.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRSMIDURI
Gross margin 19.6% 23.5% 39.1%
EBITDA margin -61.9% 16.1% 36.1%
Operating margin -75.0% 12.1% 25.5%
Pretax margin 5.4% 12.0% 21.8%
Net margin 4.0% 8.6% 16.3%
FCF margin 7.3% 4.7% 5.1%
Operating cash flow margin 20.9% 16.3% 35.4%
Return on equity 17.8% 13.7% 30.2%
Return on assets 3.2% 8.6% 8.9%
Return on invested capital -70.6% 12.8% 14.0%
Return on capital employed -80.1% 13.8% 16.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.3x 1.9x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRSMIDURI
Debt / assets 44.6% 4.8% 44.7%
Debt / equity 2.4x 0.1x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x -0.5x 2.3x
Debt / FCF 7.6x 1.0x 16.4x
Liabilities / assets 81.6% 34.2% 70.4%
Equity / assets 18.4% 65.8% 29.6%
Interest coverage -25.2x 48.9x –
Current ratio 0.7x 4.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 3.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.9x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -0.58 5.00 3.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRSMIDURI
Dividend yield 1.3% – 0.7%
Net buyback yield 5.1% – 2.6%
Shareholder yield 6.4% 0.0% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 28.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 15.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 5.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRSMIDURI
Forward P/E 19.5xFY2026 – 20.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $14.45FY2026 – $55.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 – +31.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.6% – +6.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $14.12BFY2026 – $18.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 – +16.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.3% – +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRSMIDURI
Held by institutions 90.8% 57.0% 95.9%
Institutions holding 579 56 1,586
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% -1.1% +4.7%
Institutions buying 309 23 803
Institutions selling 177 17 537
Buyers to sellers 1.75 1.35 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RSMIDURI
R 1.00 0.31 0.45
SMID 0.31 1.00 0.19
URI 0.45 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, R, SMID and URI?

United Rentals (URI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ryder System (R) $10.78B, Smith Midland (SMID) $112.32M, United Rentals (URI) $73.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, R, SMID and URI?

Smith Midland (SMID) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ryder System (R) 20.7x, Smith Midland (SMID) 14.5x, United Rentals (URI) 25.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ryder System (R) is cheapest (Ryder System (R) 19.5x, United Rentals (URI) 20.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Rentals (URI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ryder System (R) +3.2%, Smith Midland (SMID) -1.6%, United Rentals (URI) +9.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Rentals (URI) has the highest net margin (Ryder System (R) 4.0%, Smith Midland (SMID) 8.6%, United Rentals (URI) 16.3%). On return on invested capital, United Rentals (URI) leads (Ryder System (R) -70.6%, Smith Midland (SMID) 12.8%, United Rentals (URI) 14.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ryder System (R) returned the most: Ryder System (R) +74.9%, Smith Midland (SMID) -47.1%, United Rentals (URI) +22.9%. Over five years, Ryder System (R) compounded fastest (Ryder System (R) +26.6%/yr, Smith Midland (SMID) +3.4%/yr, United Rentals (URI) +26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ryder System (R) 0.01%, Smith Midland (SMID) 0.00%, United Rentals (URI) 0.00%. Smith Midland (SMID) and United Rentals (URI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryder System (R) has been the steadiest (Ryder System (R) 32.1%, Smith Midland (SMID) 51.1%, United Rentals (URI) 42.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, R, SMID and URI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.