R vs RXO vs TLSS Stock Comparison

Ryder System, Rxo and Transportation & Logistics Systems Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
R Ryder System Inc
$279.65 +18.7% 1M +66.2% 1Y
Market cap
$10.69B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
1.34%
Logistics Industrials
7 wins
RXO RXO, Inc.
$29.11 +47.2% 1M +64.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.09B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 7, Rxo 2, Transportation & Logistics Systems 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRRXOTLSSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.69B $4.80B $1.18B R
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.6x -47.0x 921.6x R
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.4x 223.9x — R
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.2% +9.5% — RXO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% -1.7% — R
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -70.6% -3.3% — RXO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x 16.0x — R
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.34% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +66.2% +64.5% +1,900.0% TLSS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +26.4%/yr — +58.5%/yr TLSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.1% 75.6% — R
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 24/100 32/100 R

Percentile Scorecard

RRXOTLSS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRRXOTLSS
Valuation 37 #86 of 136 14 #117 of 136 3 #132 of 136
Growth 62 #47 of 121 18 #99 of 121 93 #9 of 121
Profitability 27 #84 of 115 20 #92 of 115 –
Financial Health 4 #137 of 143 43 #82 of 143 0 #143 of 143
Shareholder Returns 69 #26 of 82 – –
Overall 40 24 32
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • RXO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TLSS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRRXOTLSSSPY
1 month +18.7%+47.2%+1,900.0% -0.2%
3 months +7.5%+28.5%+1,900.0% +3.9%
6 months +12.9%+49.1%+1,900.0% +8.2%
Year to date +46.1%+130.3%+1,900.0% +12.9%
1 year +66.2%+64.5%+1,900.0% +12.3%
3 years +202.7%+68.6%+1,900.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +44.7%+19.0%+171.6% +23.3%
5 years +222.8%—+900.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +26.4%—+58.5% +10.9%
10 years +304.2%—-97.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +15.0%—-31.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRRXOTLSSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.1%75.6%— 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.0%82.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.021.83— 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.060.85— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.8%-67.1%-92.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.9%-0.7%-75.0% -1.2%
52-week high $282.13$29.32$0.80 $779.14
52-week low $162.50$10.48$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRRXOTLSS
P/E now vs peer median 20.6xmedian 16.3x -47.0xmedian 16.3x 921.6xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.0x 0.8xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 8.7x 176.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 11.4x -63.2xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.2x 3.2xmedian 1.2x -55.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.47median 0.82 0.46median 0.82 33.33median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRRXOTLSS
Revenue $13.08B $6.09B –
Gross profit $2.56B $1.11B –
Operating income -$9.81B -$76.00M -$1.30M
Net income $520.00M -$105.00M $211.13K
Free cash flow $954.00M -$76.00M –
EPS (diluted) $13.41 $-0.62 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $198.00M $15.00M $29.08K
Total debt $30.21B $495.00M $175.00K
Shares (diluted) 38.79M 169.65M 5.89B
Enterprise value $9.89B $4.72B $1.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRRXOTLSS
P/E 20.6x -47.0x 921.6x
P/FCF 11.2x -63.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 3.9x -282.4x –
P/S 0.8x 0.8x –
P/B 3.6x 3.2x -55.3x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 4.5x -55.3x
EV/EBITDA -2.2x 176.0x –
EV/EBIT -1.8x -69.5x -904.0x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.9x –
EV/FCF 18.5x -69.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.5x -310.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.47 0.46 33.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRRXOTLSS
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.2% 9.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 12.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.4% -1.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 1.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -4.2% -2.7% 14.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.7% -62.7% 28.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 3.6% 65.9% 128.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% -120.7% 26.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.2% 66.1% 514.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.3% -101.3% 27.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.8% -342.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.9% -27.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1,184% -68.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.1% -36.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRRXOTLSS
Gross margin 19.6% 18.2% –
EBITDA margin -61.9% 0.5% –
Operating margin -75.0% -1.2% –
Pretax margin 5.4% -2.0% –
Net margin 4.0% -1.7% –
FCF margin 7.3% -1.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 20.9% -0.3% –
Return on equity 17.8% -7.0% –
Return on assets 3.2% -3.1% 881.2%
Return on invested capital -70.6% -3.3% –
Return on capital employed -80.1% -3.6% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.3x 0.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRRXOTLSS
Debt / assets 44.6% 14.3% 572.2%
Debt / equity 2.4x 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x 16.0x –
Debt / FCF 7.6x -6.5x –
Liabilities / assets 81.6% 56.5% 69,686%
Equity / assets 18.4% 43.5% -69,586%
Interest coverage -25.2x – -18.2x
Current ratio 0.7x 1.3x 0.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.2x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -0.58 3.10 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRRXOTLSS
Dividend yield 1.3% – –
Net buyback yield 5.2% – –
Shareholder yield 6.5% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 28.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 15.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 5.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRRXOTLSS
Forward P/E 19.4xFY2026 223.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $14.45FY2026 $0.13FY2026 $0.00FY2023
EPS growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +30.6% +384.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $14.12BFY2026 $7.20BFY2026 $31.69MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 +25.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +2.3% -0.1% +288.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRRXOTLSS
Held by institutions 90.8% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 579 302 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% -1.3% –
Institutions buying 309 164 –
Institutions selling 177 82 –
Buyers to sellers 1.75 2.00 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RRXOTLSS
R 1.00 0.46 –
RXO 0.46 1.00 –
TLSS – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, R, RXO and TLSS?

Ryder System (R) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ryder System (R) $10.69B, Rxo (RXO) $4.80B, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) $1.18B.

Which stock is cheaper, R, RXO and TLSS?

Ryder System (R) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ryder System (R) 20.6x, Rxo (RXO) -47.0x, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) 921.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ryder System (R) is cheapest (Ryder System (R) 19.4x, Rxo (RXO) 223.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rxo (RXO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ryder System (R) +3.2%, Rxo (RXO) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ryder System (R) has the highest net margin (Ryder System (R) 4.0%, Rxo (RXO) -1.7%). On return on invested capital, Rxo (RXO) leads (Ryder System (R) -70.6%, Rxo (RXO) -3.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) returned the most: Ryder System (R) +66.2%, Rxo (RXO) +64.5%, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +1,900.0%. Over five years, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) compounded fastest (Ryder System (R) +26.4%/yr, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +58.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ryder System (R) 1.34%. Rxo (RXO) and Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryder System (R) has been the steadiest (Ryder System (R) 32.1%, Rxo (RXO) 75.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, R, RXO and TLSS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.