QNC vs QUBT vs FCCN Stock Comparison

Quantum eMotion, Quantum Computing and Spectral Capital Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
QNC Quantum eMotion Corp
$1.11 -36.6% 1M
Market cap
$188.57M
P/E
435.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
1 win
QUBT Quantum Computing Inc.
$6.82 -19.4% 1M -56.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.47B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.82M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
2 wins
FCCN SPECTRAL CAPITAL Corp
$1.83 -53.0% 1M -14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$181.34M
P/E
3,859x
Revenue (TTM)
$668.63M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Spectral Capital leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Spectral Capital 3, Quantum Computing 2, Quantum eMotion 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionQNCQUBTFCCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $188.57M $1.47B $181.34M QUBT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 435.4x -98.2x 3,859x QNC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +3,635.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -152.5% 0.0% FCCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — -56.1% -14.9% FCCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +1.8%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 93.6% 88.8% 109.6% QUBT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 33/100 41/100 FCCN

Percentile Scorecard

QNCQUBTFCCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisQNCQUBTFCCN
Valuation 11 #110 of 124 25 #93 of 124 57 #54 of 124
Growth – 29 #81 of 113 42 #66 of 113
Profitability – 18 #90 of 109 62 #42 of 109
Financial Health 94 #8 of 127 93 #10 of 127 18 #105 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 0 #63 of 63 29 #45 of 63
Overall – 33 41
  • QNC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QUBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FCCN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodQNCQUBTFCCNSPY
1 month -36.6%-19.4%-53.0% +0.7%
3 months -47.6%-15.0%-64.0% +3.7%
6 months -60.8%-24.4%-10.7% +7.1%
Year to date —-33.5%-55.7% +12.8%
1 year —-56.1%-14.9% +11.9%
3 years —+917.9%— +85.2%
3 years, per year —+116.8%— +22.8%
5 years —+9.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year —+1.8%— +10.9%
10 years —+3,310.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+42.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureQNCQUBTFCCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 93.6%88.8%109.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 95.6%85.4%100.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.933.700.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.63-0.14 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.0%-94.4%-81.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.7%-59.2%-67.0% -1.2%
52-week high $3.79$16.71$5.55 $779.14
52-week low $1.06$6.31$1.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleQNCQUBTFCCN
P/E now vs peer median 478.5xmedian 39.0x -102.3xmedian 39.0x 3,584xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 226,929xmedian 4.6x 157.1xmedian 4.6x 0.3xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 32.7x -8.6xmedian 32.7x 321.6xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13,821xmedian 27.4x -30.0xmedian 27.4x -68.4xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.0xmedian 3.2x 1.0xmedian 3.2x 3.1xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.23 -2.55median 1.23 118.59median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsQNCQUBTFCCN
Revenue – $9.82M $668.63M
Gross profit – -$1.86M $8.35M
Operating income – -$76.18M -$6.62M
Net income -$9.47M -$14.98M -$21.19K
Free cash flow – -$51.48M -$2.57M
R&D $1.04M $26.91M –
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-0.07 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $222.23K $189.15M $5.27M
Shares (diluted) 186.70M 224.73M 94.89M
Enterprise value $101.64M -$2.14B $170.85M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricQNCQUBTFCCN
P/E 478.5x -102.3x 3,584x
P/FCF 13,821x -30.0x -68.4x
P/Operating cash flow – -35.9x -68.8x
P/S 226,929x 157.1x 0.3x
P/B 9.0x 1.0x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 12.2x 1.0x 9.0x
EV/EBITDA – -8.6x 321.6x
EV/EBIT – -7.7x -25.8x
EV/Revenue – 60.0x 0.3x
EV/FCF – -11.5x -66.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – -13.7x -66.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -2.55 118.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricQNCQUBTFCCN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 3,635% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 230.4% 1,948%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -2,367% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -158.9% 276.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -132.2% -83.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -36.2% -304.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – 80.4% 99.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.1% 40.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 87.7% 100.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 40.2% 30.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -128.0% -28.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -41.0% -186.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -105.7% -29.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -45.3% -186.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricQNCQUBTFCCN
Gross margin – -18.9% 1.2%
EBITDA margin – -697.4% 0.1%
Operating margin – -775.5% -1.0%
Pretax margin – -152.5% 0.0%
Net margin – -152.5% 0.0%
FCF margin – -524.0% -0.4%
Operating cash flow margin – -438.3% -0.4%
Return on equity – -0.9% 0.1%
Return on assets – -0.9% 0.0%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -4.7% -4.7%
Asset turnover – 0.0x 2.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.9x 120.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 86.5% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricQNCQUBTFCCN
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 21.0% 2.9% 74.3%
Equity / assets 79.0% 97.1% 25.7%
Interest coverage – -577.1x –
Current ratio 33.3x 53.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 35.0x 51.7x 0.8x
Cash ratio 35.0x 51.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 20.00 3.17

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricQNCQUBTFCCN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -77.7% -1.1%
Shareholder yield – -77.7% -1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusQNCQUBTFCCN
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.15FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $29.28MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +4,193.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +84.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersQNCQUBTFCCN
Held by institutions 31.6% 45.4% –
Institutions holding 38 314 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1,128.1% +10.7% –
Institutions buying 22 196 –
Institutions selling 7 61 –
Buyers to sellers 3.14 3.21 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

QNCQUBTFCCN
QNC 1.00 0.37 0.18
QUBT 0.37 1.00 0.06
FCCN 0.18 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, QNC, QUBT and FCCN?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Quantum eMotion (QNC) $188.57M, Quantum Computing (QUBT) $1.47B, Spectral Capital (FCCN) $181.34M.

Which stock is cheaper, QNC, QUBT and FCCN?

Quantum eMotion (QNC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Quantum eMotion (QNC) 435.4x, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -98.2x, Spectral Capital (FCCN) 3,859x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is more profitable?

Spectral Capital (FCCN) has the highest net margin (Quantum Computing (QUBT) -152.5%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Spectral Capital (FCCN) returned the most: Quantum Computing (QUBT) -56.1%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) -14.9%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quantum Computing (QUBT) has been the steadiest (Quantum eMotion (QNC) 93.6%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) 88.8%, Spectral Capital (FCCN) 109.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, QNC, QUBT and FCCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Spectral Capital (FCCN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.