QBTS vs QUBT vs INFQ Stock Comparison

D-Wave Quantum, Quantum Computing and Infleqtion Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.
$11.56 -29.6% 1M -66.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.92B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.43M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
2 wins
QUBT Quantum Computing Inc.
$6.82 -19.4% 1M -56.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.47B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.82M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
4 wins
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.
$9.43 -31.9% 1M
Market cap
$1.94B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$41.08M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Quantum Computing leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Quantum Computing 4, D-Wave Quantum 2, Infleqtion 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionQBTSQUBTINFQLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.92B $1.47B $1.94B QBTS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -15.8x -98.2x -19.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -44.2% +3,635.4% — QUBT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2,001.6% -152.5% -240.6% QUBT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -12.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -66.3% -56.1% — QUBT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.3%/yr +1.8%/yr — QBTS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 100.2% 88.8% 105.8% QUBT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 33/100 34/100 INFQ

Percentile Scorecard

QBTSQUBTINFQ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisQBTSQUBTINFQ
Valuation 20 #100 of 124 25 #93 of 124 29 #88 of 124
Growth 12 #100 of 113 29 #81 of 113 21 #89 of 113
Profitability 15 #93 of 109 18 #90 of 109 19 #88 of 109
Financial Health 92 #11 of 127 93 #10 of 127 96 #6 of 127
Shareholder Returns 26 #47 of 63 0 #63 of 63 5 #60 of 63
Overall 33 33 34
  • QBTS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QUBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • INFQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodQBTSQUBTINFQSPY
1 month -29.6%-19.4%-31.9% +0.7%
3 months -35.7%-15.0%-5.5% +3.7%
6 months -43.0%-24.4%-20.7% +7.1%
Year to date -55.8%-33.5%— +12.8%
1 year -66.3%-56.1%— +11.9%
3 years +1,706.3%+917.9%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +162.6%+116.8%— +22.8%
5 years +17.7%+9.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.3%+1.8%— +10.9%
10 years —+3,310.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+42.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureQBTSQUBTINFQSPY
Volatility, 1Y 100.2%88.8%105.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 93.3%85.4%95.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.153.704.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.63— 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.7%-94.4%-57.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.8%-59.2%-52.5% -1.2%
52-week high $37.06$16.71$19.87 $779.14
52-week low $11.54$6.31$8.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleQBTSQUBTINFQ
P/E now vs peer median -17.2xmedian 39.0x -102.3xmedian 39.0x -21.0xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 346.1xmedian 4.6x 157.1xmedian 4.6x 51.6xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -23.5xmedian 32.7x -8.6xmedian 32.7x -21.4xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.1xmedian 27.4x -30.0xmedian 27.4x -95.9xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 3.2x 1.0xmedian 3.2x 3.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 11.59median 1.23 -2.55median 1.23 —median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsQBTSQUBTINFQ
Revenue $12.43M $9.82M $41.08M
Gross profit $7.98M -$1.86M $11.86M
Operating income -$170.58M -$76.18M -$81.99M
Net income -$248.70M -$14.98M -$98.83M
Free cash flow -$119.08M -$51.48M -$22.09M
R&D $81.78M $26.91M $33.10M
EPS (diluted) $-0.67 $-0.07 $-0.45
Cash & equivalents $296.64M $189.15M $59.29M
Total debt $35.03M – –
Shares (diluted) 370.84M 224.73M 219.74M
Enterprise value $1.07B -$2.14B $1.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricQBTSQUBTINFQ
P/E -17.2x -102.3x -21.0x
P/FCF -36.1x -30.0x -95.9x
P/Operating cash flow -38.8x -35.9x -103.9x
P/S 346.1x 157.1x 51.6x
P/B 4.0x 1.0x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 1.0x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA -23.5x -8.6x -21.4x
EV/EBIT -22.2x -7.7x -20.0x
EV/Revenue 305.0x 60.0x 40.0x
EV/FCF -31.8x -11.5x -74.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -34.2x -13.7x -80.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 11.59 -2.55 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricQBTSQUBTINFQ
Revenue growth (1Y) -44.2% 3,635% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.0% 230.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -56.6% -2,367% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 31.6% -158.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -116.9% -132.2% -13.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.8% -36.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 11.7% 80.4% -39.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -45.9% 18.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 28.0% 87.7% 80.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -1.5% 40.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -119.0% -128.0% -109.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.1% -41.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -124.4% -105.7% -103.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.9% -45.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricQBTSQUBTINFQ
Gross margin 64.2% -18.9% 28.9%
EBITDA margin -1,297% -697.4% -186.7%
Operating margin -1,373% -775.5% -199.6%
Pretax margin -1,267% -152.5% -174.4%
Net margin -2,002% -152.5% -240.6%
FCF margin -958.4% -524.0% -53.8%
Operating cash flow margin -892.4% -438.3% -49.6%
Return on equity -11.7% -0.9% -12.4%
Return on assets -10.9% -0.9% -11.4%
Return on invested capital -12.3% – –
Return on capital employed -14.8% -4.7% -14.3%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 2.9x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 250.5% 86.5% 54.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricQBTSQUBTINFQ
Debt / assets 3.0% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x – –
Debt / FCF -0.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 6.5% 2.9% 10.5%
Equity / assets 93.5% 97.1% 89.5%
Interest coverage -180.3x -577.1x –
Current ratio 20.5x 53.1x 9.3x
Quick ratio 20.1x 51.7x 9.1x
Cash ratio 20.0x 51.3x 8.9x
Altman Z-score 33.07 20.00 18.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricQBTSQUBTINFQ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.4% -77.7% -19.9%
Shareholder yield -1.4% -77.7% -19.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusQBTSQUBTINFQ
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.31FY2026 $-0.15FY2026 $-0.24FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $40.06MFY2026 $29.28MFY2026 $46.67MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +62.9%FY2026 +4,193.8%FY2026 +43.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +112.2% +84.3% +26.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersQBTSQUBTINFQ
Held by institutions 53.1% 45.4% 41.9%
Institutions holding 550 314 261
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.5% +10.7% +148.6%
Institutions buying 370 196 231
Institutions selling 100 61 23
Buyers to sellers 3.70 3.21 10.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

QBTSQUBTINFQ
QBTS 1.00 0.86 0.76
QUBT 0.86 1.00 0.76
INFQ 0.76 0.76 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, QBTS, QUBT and INFQ?

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) is the largest by market capitalisation: D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) $3.92B, Quantum Computing (QUBT) $1.47B, Infleqtion (INFQ) $1.94B.

Which company is growing faster?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -44.2%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) +3,635.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) has the highest net margin (D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -2,001.6%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -152.5%, Infleqtion (INFQ) -240.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quantum Computing (QUBT) returned the most: D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -66.3%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -56.1%. Over five years, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) compounded fastest (D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) +3.3%/yr, Quantum Computing (QUBT) +1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quantum Computing (QUBT) has been the steadiest (D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) 100.2%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) 88.8%, Infleqtion (INFQ) 105.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, QBTS, QUBT and INFQ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quantum Computing (QUBT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.