PWR vs WM vs APWC Stock Comparison

Quanta Services, Waste Management and Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$635.18 -2.6% 1M +41.6% 1Y
Market cap
$95.45B
P/E
56.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.29B
Div. yield
0.07%
Utility Construction Industrials
4 wins
WM Waste Management Inc
$230.86 +11.5% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$91.81B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
1.58%
Solid Waste Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 5, Quanta Services 4, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPWRWMAPWCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.45B $91.81B $24.33M PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 56.7x 30.0x 3.6x APWC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.0x 26.7x — WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +37.1% +5.2% +9.0% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 11.8% 1.3% WM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.4% 4.1% WM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.07% 1.58% 0.00% WM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +41.6% +16.9% -35.8% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +39.3%/yr +7.6%/yr -17.9%/yr PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.2% 21.3% 59.2% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 54/100 59/100 APWC

Percentile Scorecard

PWRWMAPWC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPWRWMAPWC
Valuation 20 #42 of 52 47 #9 of 16 72 #58 of 203
Growth 78 #9 of 37 62 #6 of 14 63 #71 of 188
Profitability 72 #11 of 37 100 #1 of 14 24 #140 of 183
Financial Health 41 #34 of 57 7 #14 of 15 78 #49 of 216
Shareholder Returns 19 #22 of 27 – –
Overall 46 54 59
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • APWC ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPWRWMAPWCSPY
1 month -2.6%+11.5%-11.9% +0.7%
3 months -3.5%+2.0%-20.3% +3.7%
6 months -12.7%-0.7%-22.9% +7.1%
Year to date +50.5%+5.1%-36.7% +12.8%
1 year +41.6%+16.9%-35.8% +11.9%
3 years +285.5%+41.8%-8.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +56.8%+12.4%-2.9% +22.8%
5 years +423.7%+44.1%-62.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +39.3%+7.6%-17.9% +10.9%
10 years +2,124.0%+260.8%-46.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +36.4%+13.7%-6.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePWRWMAPWCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.2%21.3%59.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.8%20.3%48.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.72-0.430.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.920.79-0.61 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.9%-18.7%-65.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.1%-6.3%-43.5% -1.2%
52-week high $785.24$246.51$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $413.17$196.77$1.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePWRWMAPWC
P/E now vs peer median 56.7xmedian 28.1x 30.0xmedian 30.9x 3.6xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 0.8x 3.5xmedian 3.2x 0.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.7x 14.8xmedian 14.0x —median 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.8xmedian 25.0x 24.5xmedian 17.3x -3.6xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 9.0xmedian 2.5x 9.3xmedian 2.8x 0.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.71median 0.60 2.86median 2.44 —median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPWRWMAPWC
Revenue $37.29B $26.07B $529.68M
Gross profit $5.88B $10.53B $43.84M
Operating income $2.55B $4.80B $13.32M
Net income – $3.07B $11.40M
Free cash flow – $3.74B -$6.69M
EPS (diluted) $11.04 $7.68 $0.33
Cash & equivalents $2.32B $247.00M $64.58M
Total debt – $23.37B $194.37M
Shares (diluted) 152.44M 399.80M 20.62M
Enterprise value $95.54B $90.65B -$130.49M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPWRWMAPWC
P/E 56.7x 30.0x 3.6x
P/FCF 42.8x 24.5x -3.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 14.0x -3.6x
P/S 2.6x 3.5x 0.0x
P/B 9.0x 9.3x 0.1x
P/Tangible book 12.8x 14.5x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA – 14.8x –
EV/EBIT – 23.9x 1.1x
EV/Revenue 2.6x 4.4x 0.0x
EV/FCF – 30.7x -2.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 17.5x -2.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.71 2.86 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPWRWMAPWC
Revenue growth (1Y) 37.1% 5.2% 9.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.1% 9.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.6% -21.0% 29.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.9% 11.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 61.2% 17.9% 56.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.7% 10.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 19.7% 101.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 64.2% 21.1% 119.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 10.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.1% -138.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 55.7% -138.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPWRWMAPWC
Gross margin – 40.4% 8.3%
EBITDA margin – 29.8% –
Operating margin – 18.4% 2.5%
Pretax margin – 14.9% 2.8%
Net margin – 11.8% 1.3%
FCF margin – 14.3% -1.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 25.2% -1.3%
Return on equity 16.8% 31.0% 4.2%
Return on assets 5.6% 6.6% 2.6%
Return on invested capital – 11.4% 4.1%
Return on capital employed – 12.0% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.6x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x -0.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPWRWMAPWC
Debt / assets – 50.2% 13.3%
Debt / equity – 2.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.0x –
Debt / FCF – 6.2x -8.7x
Liabilities / assets 67.6% 78.8% 38.6%
Equity / assets 32.4% 21.2% 61.4%
Interest coverage – – 7.7x
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x –
Quick ratio – 0.7x –
Cash ratio – 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – 2.93 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPWRWMAPWC
Dividend yield 0.1% 1.6% –
Net buyback yield – 1.7% –
Shareholder yield 0.1% 3.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 48.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 39.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 13.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPWRWMAPWC
Forward P/E 40.0xFY2026 26.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $15.88FY2026 $8.65FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +47.7%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +27.0% +9.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $40.73BFY2026 $25.84BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +43.0%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% +12.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPWRWMAPWC
Held by institutions 88.9% 82.3% –
Institutions holding 1,921 2,350 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.5% +0.8% –
Institutions buying 972 1,096 –
Institutions selling 705 901 –
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.22 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PWRWMAPWC
PWR 1.00 -0.29 0.05
WM -0.29 1.00 -0.19
APWC 0.05 -0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PWR, WM and APWC?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Quanta Services (PWR) $95.45B, Waste Management (WM) $91.81B, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) $24.33M.

Which stock is cheaper, PWR, WM and APWC?

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Quanta Services (PWR) 56.7x, Waste Management (WM) 30.0x, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 3.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Quanta Services (PWR) 40.0x, Waste Management (WM) 26.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Quanta Services (PWR) +37.1%, Waste Management (WM) +5.2%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) +9.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest net margin (Waste Management (WM) 11.8%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Waste Management (WM) leads (Waste Management (WM) 11.4%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 4.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Quanta Services (PWR) +41.6%, Waste Management (WM) +16.9%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) -35.8%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (Quanta Services (PWR) +39.3%/yr, Waste Management (WM) +7.6%/yr, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) -17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest dividend yield: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.07%, Waste Management (WM) 1.58%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 0.00%. Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Quanta Services (PWR) 45.2%, Waste Management (WM) 21.3%, Asia Pacific Wire & Cable (APWC) 59.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PWR, WM and APWC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.