PWR vs VST vs IESC Stock Comparison

Quanta Services, Vistra and IES Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$546.35 -13.9% 1M +27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$84.69B
P/E
63.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.00%
Utility Construction Industrials
5 wins
VST Vistra Corp.
$140.15 +1.6% 1M -26.8% 1Y
Market cap
$47.77B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.21B
Div. yield
0.01%
Independent Power Producers Utilities
5 wins
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.
$213.54 -33.2% 1M -43.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.65B
P/E
19.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.99B
Div. yield
–
Utility Construction Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Quanta Services leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Quanta Services 5, Vistra 5, IES Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPWRVSTIESCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.69B $47.77B $8.65B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 63.8x 23.6x 19.0x IESC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.4x 15.9x 19.7x VST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.3% +3.8% +22.7% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% 10.6% 11.4% IESC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% 11.3% — VST
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 2.8x — PWR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% VST
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.8% -26.8% -43.9% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.9%/yr +49.0%/yr +34.3%/yr VST
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.7% 51.0% 106.2% PWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 68/100 67/100 VST

Percentile Scorecard

PWRVSTIESC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPWRVSTIESC
Valuation 26 #39 of 52 74 #7 of 24 47 #28 of 52
Growth 72 #11 of 37 55 #11 of 23 83 #7 of 37
Profitability 72 #11 of 37 100 #1 of 23 92 #4 of 37
Financial Health 50 #29 of 57 39 #15 of 24 89 #7 of 57
Shareholder Returns 42 #16 of 27 74 #6 of 20 23 #21 of 27
Overall 52 68 67
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • VST ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • IESC ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPWRVSTIESCSPY
1 month -13.9%+1.6%-33.2% -1.0%
3 months -12.7%-14.2%-65.9% +2.9%
6 months -12.6%-14.7%-64.4% +6.4%
Year to date +29.4%-13.1%-45.1% +11.4%
1 year +27.8%-26.8%-43.9% +13.1%
3 years +226.7%+328.6%+244.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +48.4%+62.5%+51.1% +21.5%
5 years +362.8%+633.4%+336.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +35.9%+49.0%+34.3% +10.9%
10 years +1,832.6%+792.7%+1,255.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year +34.5%+24.5%+29.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePWRVSTIESCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.7%51.0%106.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.7%55.0%130.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.711.592.97 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.62-0.52-0.41 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.9%-48.9%-73.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.4%-30.4%-73.1% -2.5%
52-week high $785.24$201.47$793.96 $779.14
52-week low $413.17$134.71$213.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePWRVSTIESC
P/E now vs peer median 61.8xmedian 25.6x 23.3xmedian 24.1x 18.7xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 0.8x 2.5xmedian 2.6x 2.1xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.6xmedian 12.7x 10.2xmedian 11.3x 14.7xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.9xmedian 22.4x 20.9xmedian 12.9x 37.3xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 2.3x 8.6xmedian 2.1x 6.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.01median 0.57 1.47median 0.59 0.25median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPWRVSTIESC
Revenue $32.91B $19.21B $3.99B
Gross profit $5.09B – $1.05B
Operating income $2.04B $3.56B $492.85M
Net income $1.35B $2.22B $457.91M
Free cash flow $2.29B $2.26B $228.40M
EPS (diluted) $8.70 $5.98 $11.29
Cash & equivalents $506.43M $435.00M $77.28M
Total debt $6.10B $19.60B –
Shares (diluted) 152.44M 339.23M 40.40M
Enterprise value $82.77B $40.96B $7.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPWRVSTIESC
P/E 61.8x 23.3x 18.7x
P/FCF 35.9x 20.9x 37.3x
P/Operating cash flow 25.8x 9.2x 22.9x
P/S 2.5x 2.5x 2.1x
P/B 8.4x 8.6x 6.9x
P/Tangible book 12.6x 14.7x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA 28.6x 10.2x 14.7x
EV/EBIT 43.1x 18.2x 16.5x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 3.4x 2.0x
EV/FCF 38.3x 28.7x 35.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.6x 12.7x 21.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.01 1.47 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPWRVSTIESC
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.3% 3.8% 22.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 4.9% 19.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.8% – 29.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.2% – 37.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 36.3% -0.5% 39.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 12.3% 55.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.2% -8.9% 66.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.5% 11.4% 67.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% -6.0% 69.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 15.9% 74.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 59.6% 21.2% 50.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.8% 6.7% 41.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.4% 36.4% 23.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.7% -4.7% 25.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPWRVSTIESC
Gross margin 15.5% – 26.3%
EBITDA margin 9.3% 33.0% 13.8%
Operating margin 6.2% 18.5% 12.4%
Pretax margin 5.3% 14.6% 14.5%
Net margin 4.0% 10.6% 11.4%
FCF margin 7.0% 11.7% 5.7%
Operating cash flow margin 9.7% 26.7% 9.3%
Return on equity 14.3% 40.0% 39.8%
Return on assets 5.0% 5.3% 21.4%
Return on invested capital 10.1% 11.3% –
Return on capital employed 12.6% 11.3% 41.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.5x 1.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 2.3x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.7% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPWRVSTIESC
Debt / assets 21.6% 46.0% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 3.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 2.8x –
Debt / FCF 2.7x 8.7x –
Liabilities / assets 65.6% 87.1% 46.0%
Equity / assets 34.4% 12.9% 54.0%
Interest coverage 6.9x 3.1x 140.8x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.0x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 4.46 1.52 8.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPWRVSTIESC
Dividend yield 0.1% 0.7% –
Net buyback yield – 2.4% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 0.1% 3.1% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 4.7% 13.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 2.8% 13.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.9% 0.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 0.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPWRVSTIESC
Forward P/E 34.4xFY2026 15.9xFY2026 19.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $15.87FY2026 $8.84FY2026 $10.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +47.6%FY2026 +305.5%FY2026 +58.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.0% +21.3% +18.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $40.74BFY2026 $21.35BFY2026 $4.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +43.0%FY2026 +20.4%FY2026 +21.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.5% +21.0% +60.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPWRVSTIESC
Held by institutions 88.9% 84.4% 96.8%
Institutions holding 1,919 1,403 412
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.5% +2.7% +0.6%
Institutions buying 972 852 224
Institutions selling 703 415 144
Buyers to sellers 1.38 2.05 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PWRVSTIESC
PWR 1.00 0.49 0.54
VST 0.49 1.00 0.26
IESC 0.54 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PWR, VST and IESC?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Quanta Services (PWR) $84.69B, Vistra (VST) $47.77B, IES Holdings (IESC) $8.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, PWR, VST and IESC?

IES Holdings (IESC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Quanta Services (PWR) 63.8x, Vistra (VST) 23.6x, IES Holdings (IESC) 19.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Vistra (VST) is cheapest (Quanta Services (PWR) 34.4x, Vistra (VST) 15.9x, IES Holdings (IESC) 19.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%, Vistra (VST) +3.8%, IES Holdings (IESC) +22.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

IES Holdings (IESC) has the highest net margin (Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%, Vistra (VST) 10.6%, IES Holdings (IESC) 11.4%). On return on invested capital, Vistra (VST) leads (Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%, Vistra (VST) 11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Quanta Services (PWR) +27.8%, Vistra (VST) -26.8%, IES Holdings (IESC) -43.9%. Over five years, Vistra (VST) compounded fastest (Quanta Services (PWR) +35.9%/yr, Vistra (VST) +49.0%/yr, IES Holdings (IESC) +34.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Vistra (VST) has the highest dividend yield: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.00%, Vistra (VST) 0.01%, IES Holdings (IESC) 0.00%. IES Holdings (IESC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quanta Services (PWR) has been the steadiest (Quanta Services (PWR) 44.7%, Vistra (VST) 51.0%, IES Holdings (IESC) 106.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PWR, VST and IESC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quanta Services (PWR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.