PUSA vs VICI vs MSGS Stock Comparison

Powerus, Vici Properties and Madison Square Garden Sports Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.91 -48.7% 1M -75.6% 1Y
Market cap
$95.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
VICI Vici Properties Inc.
$23.72 +0.9% 1M -23.4% 1Y
Market cap
$26.12B
P/E
9.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.10B
Div. yield
7.63%
Gaming REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Vici Properties leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Vici Properties 5, Madison Square Garden Sports 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSAVICIMSGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.22M $26.12B $9.26B VICI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.2x 9.4x 1,197x VICI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% +4.4% +11.0% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% 67.5% 0.7% VICI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.6x 2.9x MSGS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 7.63% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -75.6% -23.4% +68.6% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -4.6%/yr +15.9%/yr MSGS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 114.5% 19.4% 29.7% VICI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 84/100 37/100 VICI

Percentile Scorecard

PUSAVICIMSGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSAVICIMSGS
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 88 #19 of 145 16 #37 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 56 #62 of 141 45 #24 of 43
Profitability 8 #38 of 41 100 #1 of 134 45 #23 of 41
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 86 #20 of 138 41 #28 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #29 of 29 90 #14 of 131 –
Overall 24 84 37
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • VICI ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSAVICIMSGSSPY
1 month -48.7%+0.9%-4.6% -0.2%
3 months -33.2%-12.5%-3.2% +3.9%
6 months -51.4%-17.2%+14.7% +8.2%
Year to date -39.4%-15.6%+48.6% +12.9%
1 year -75.6%-23.4%+68.6% +12.3%
3 years —-13.2%+132.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-4.6%+32.5% +23.3%
5 years —-20.9%+108.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-4.6%+15.9% +10.9%
10 years ——+135.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+9.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePUSAVICIMSGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 114.5%19.4%29.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 116.3%20.6%23.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.26-0.010.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-1.212.31 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-36.6%-32.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.6%-23.4%-7.6% -1.2%
52-week high $7.82$30.97$416.24 $779.14
52-week low $1.87$22.54$212.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSAVICIMSGS
P/E now vs peer median -19.2xmedian 17.0x 9.4xmedian 26.3x 1,197xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 1.9x 6.4xmedian 4.0x 8.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.3xmedian 10.8x 11.7xmedian 14.4x 291.8xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -40.1xmedian 11.2x 10.6xmedian 23.3x 151.1xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.4x 0.9xmedian 1.3x -35.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 1.55median 1.91 -26.31median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSAVICIMSGS
Revenue $3.21M $4.10B $1.15B
Gross profit – $4.07B $320.12M
Operating income -$6.56M $3.61B $28.87M
Net income -$4.95M $2.81B $7.76M
Free cash flow -$2.38M $2.47B $61.26M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $2.54 $0.32
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $288.06M $164.51M
Total debt – $16.93B $1.10B
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 1.09B 24.25M
Enterprise value -$43.17M $24.23B $8.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSAVICIMSGS
P/E -19.2x 9.4x 1,197x
P/FCF -40.1x 10.6x 151.1x
P/Operating cash flow -59.5x 9.9x 147.7x
P/S 29.6x 6.4x 8.0x
P/B 2.0x 0.9x -35.2x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 0.9x -25.2x
EV/EBITDA -8.3x 11.7x 291.8x
EV/EBIT -8.0x 11.9x 323.9x
EV/Revenue 16.3x 10.4x 8.1x
EV/FCF -22.1x 17.3x 152.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -32.8x 16.2x 149.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.55 -26.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSAVICIMSGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% 4.4% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% 9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.4% 12.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% -1.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% 0.1% 94.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 8.3% -30.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% 0.4% 134.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 8.8% -45.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -2.7% 134.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 6.0% -45.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% 7.5% -31.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.9% -25.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% 7.4% -30.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% -26.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSAVICIMSGS
Gross margin – 99.3% 27.7%
EBITDA margin -196.5% 89.2% 2.8%
Operating margin -204.1% 88.0% 2.5%
Pretax margin -159.4% 68.6% 1.6%
Net margin -154.2% 67.5% 0.7%
FCF margin -74.0% 60.4% 5.3%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% 64.4% 5.4%
Return on equity -11.2% 9.6% –
Return on assets -10.9% 5.9% 0.5%
Return on invested capital – 7.8% –
Return on capital employed -14.6% – 3.3%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.9x 8.1x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 0.4% 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSAVICIMSGS
Debt / assets – 35.1% 16.8%
Debt / equity – 0.6x -1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.6x 2.9x
Debt / FCF – 6.8x 4.2x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 38.7% 117.1%
Equity / assets 97.0% 61.3% -17.1%
Interest coverage – 4.3x 1.4x
Current ratio 52.4x – 0.5x
Quick ratio 52.1x – 0.4x
Cash ratio 52.0x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score 39.86 – 3.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSAVICIMSGS
Dividend yield – 7.6% –
Net buyback yield -39.1% – –
Shareholder yield -39.1% 7.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 68.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 77.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSAVICIMSGS
Forward P/E – 8.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.83FY2026 $-1.03FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +8.4%FY2026 -421.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – -1.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.00BFY2026 $1.06BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – -0.3%FY2026 -7.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.9% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSAVICIMSGS
Held by institutions 4.8% 95.7% 81.3%
Institutions holding 32 946 463
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +2.7% +10.3%
Institutions buying 27 518 247
Institutions selling 1 342 136
Buyers to sellers 27.00 1.51 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSAVICIMSGS
PUSA 1.00 -0.13 0.09
VICI -0.13 1.00 0.05
MSGS 0.09 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, VICI and MSGS?

Vici Properties (VICI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $95.22M, Vici Properties (VICI) $26.12B, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $9.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, PUSA, VICI and MSGS?

Vici Properties (VICI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Powerus (PUSA) -19.2x, Vici Properties (VICI) 9.4x, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 1,197x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Vici Properties (VICI) +4.4%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vici Properties (VICI) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Vici Properties (VICI) 67.5%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -75.6%, Vici Properties (VICI) -23.4%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +68.6%. Over five years, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) compounded fastest (Vici Properties (VICI) -4.6%/yr, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +15.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Vici Properties (VICI) 7.63%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.00%. Powerus (PUSA) and Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vici Properties (VICI) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 114.5%, Vici Properties (VICI) 19.4%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 29.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, VICI and MSGS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vici Properties (VICI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.