PUSA vs SPHR vs MTN Stock Comparison

Powerus, Sphere Entertainment and Vail Resorts Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.80 -50.7% 1M -68.6% 1Y
Market cap
$89.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
SPHR Sphere Entertainment Co.
$111.94 -19.5% 1M +64.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.02B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.39B
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
MTN Vail Resorts Inc
$151.93 +10.0% 1M -0.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.41B
P/E
36.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
5.84%
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sphere Entertainment leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sphere Entertainment 5, Vail Resorts 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSASPHRMTNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.74M $4.02B $5.41B MTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.1x -55.6x 36.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 28.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% +30.7% -4.3% SPHR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% -5.2% 5.2% MTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.0% 8.2% MTN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.3x 4.0x SPHR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 5.84% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -68.6% +64.4% -0.4% SPHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +28.0%/yr -15.1%/yr SPHR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 110.4% 53.4% 37.8% MTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 51/100 46/100 SPHR

Percentile Scorecard

PUSASPHRMTN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSASPHRMTN
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 47 #24 of 44 37 #28 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 86 #7 of 43 29 #31 of 43
Profitability 7 #39 of 42 34 #28 of 42 73 #12 of 42
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 78 #11 of 47 33 #32 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #28 of 28 11 #25 of 28 59 #12 of 28
Overall 24 51 46
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • SPHR ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MTN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSASPHRMTNSPY
1 month -50.7%-19.5%+10.0% +0.9%
3 months -35.5%-20.3%-5.1% +5.9%
6 months -53.5%-19.4%+24.4% +8.5%
Year to date -42.9%+17.7%+14.4% +13.3%
1 year -68.6%+64.4%-0.4% +12.4%
3 years —+234.4%-26.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+49.6%-9.7% +23.5%
5 years —+243.9%-55.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+28.0%-15.1% +11.0%
10 years ——-3.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——-0.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasurePUSASPHRMTNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 110.4%53.4%37.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 108.5%47.2%36.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.301.250.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.621.21-0.01 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-52.3%-68.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-36.6%-6.1% -0.9%
52-week high $6.73$176.62$161.76 $779.14
52-week low $1.80$66.34$119.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSASPHRMTN
P/E now vs peer median -18.1xmedian 16.8x -55.6xmedian 16.8x 36.8xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 1.9x 2.9xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -7.4xmedian 10.2x 24.3xmedian 10.2x 11.5xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -37.8xmedian 11.2x 17.0xmedian 11.2x 21.8xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x 9.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 1.93median 0.44 -2.47median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSASPHRMTN
Revenue $3.21M $1.39B $2.84B
Gross profit – $773.11M –
Operating income -$6.56M -$166.95M $420.54M
Net income -$4.95M -$66.24M $170.74M
Free cash flow -$2.38M $237.09M $248.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $-2.01 $4.12
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $552.02M $231.35M
Total debt – $780.41M $3.19B
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 36.15M 35.79M
Enterprise value -$48.65M $1.92B $4.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSASPHRMTN
P/E -18.1x -55.6x 36.8x
P/FCF -37.8x 17.0x 21.8x
P/Operating cash flow -56.1x 13.9x 11.3x
P/S 27.9x 2.9x 1.9x
P/B 1.9x 1.8x 9.7x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.8x 20.5x
EV/EBITDA -7.4x 24.3x 11.5x
EV/EBIT -7.2x -25.4x 19.8x
EV/Revenue 14.6x 3.1x 2.9x
EV/FCF -19.8x 17.9x 33.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -29.4x 14.7x 17.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.93 -2.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSASPHRMTN
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% 30.7% -4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 34.3% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 59.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 79.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% 47.5% -24.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.1% -5.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% 41.2% -42.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -28.7% -15.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% 19.8% -45.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -28.9% -14.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% – -13.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.5% -9.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% – -22.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.3% -8.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSASPHRMTN
Gross margin – 55.6% –
EBITDA margin -196.5% 12.6% 25.6%
Operating margin -204.1% -12.0% 14.8%
Pretax margin -159.4% -12.8% 8.0%
Net margin -154.2% -5.2% 5.2%
FCF margin -74.0% 17.0% 8.7%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% 20.8% 16.9%
Return on equity -11.2% -2.1% 23.2%
Return on assets -10.9% -1.1% 3.0%
Return on invested capital – -2.0% 8.2%
Return on capital employed -14.6% -4.8% 9.3%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x -4.4x 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 4.7% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSASPHRMTN
Debt / assets – 19.3% 57.7%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 5.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.3x 4.0x
Debt / FCF – 3.3x 12.8x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 44.8% 89.9%
Equity / assets 97.0% 55.2% 10.1%
Interest coverage – -9.7x 2.0x
Current ratio 52.4x 1.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 52.1x 1.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 52.0x 0.9x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 37.59 1.51 1.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSASPHRMTN
Dividend yield – – 5.8%
Net buyback yield -41.5% -0.3% 0.8%
Shareholder yield -41.5% -0.3% 6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSASPHRMTN
Forward P/E – – 28.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $-2.72FY2026 $5.43FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – -467.6%FY2026 +31.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – – +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.29BFY2026 $2.95BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +5.9%FY2026 +4.0%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.4% +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSASPHRMTN
Held by institutions 4.8% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 32 419 439
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +5.7% +3.8%
Institutions buying 27 223 226
Institutions selling 1 139 145
Buyers to sellers 27.00 1.60 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSASPHRMTN
PUSA 1.00 0.16 0.00
SPHR 0.16 1.00 0.11
MTN 0.00 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, SPHR and MTN?

Vail Resorts (MTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $89.74M, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) $4.02B, Vail Resorts (MTN) $5.41B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) +30.7%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) -5.2%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads (Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) -2.0%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 8.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -68.6%, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) +64.4%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -0.4%. Over five years, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) compounded fastest (Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) +28.0%/yr, Vail Resorts (MTN) -15.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.84%. Powerus (PUSA) and Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vail Resorts (MTN) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 110.4%, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) 53.4%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 37.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, SPHR and MTN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sphere Entertainment (SPHR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.