PUSA vs SEG vs MSC Stock Comparison

Powerus, Seaport Entertainment and Studio City International Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$2.03 -45.4% 1M -73.4% 1Y
Market cap
$97.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Seaport Entertainment leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Seaport Entertainment 3, Studio City International Holdings 3, Powerus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSASEGMSCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $97.97M $290.22M $154.07M SEG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.8x -2.3x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% +3.1% +0.7% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% -102.5% -6.5% MSC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 8.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x 0.7x MSC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.4% -8.2% -81.4% SEG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -38.0%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 114.6% 31.6% 108.9% SEG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 41/100 63/100 MSC

Percentile Scorecard

PUSASEGMSC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSASEGMSC
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 19 #36 of 44 79 #7 of 29
Growth 0 #43 of 43 48 #23 of 43 68 #9 of 26
Profitability 8 #38 of 41 5 #39 of 41 36 #17 of 26
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 94 #4 of 47 70 #10 of 31
Shareholder Returns 0 #28 of 28 – –
Overall 24 41 63
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • SEG ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MSC ranked among 32 companies in Travel and Lodging

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSASEGMSCSPY
1 month -45.4%-3.5%-23.8% -0.8%
3 months -38.1%-14.0%-56.0% +3.5%
6 months -47.1%-0.4%-69.4% +7.0%
Year to date -35.6%+14.4%-78.3% +12.2%
1 year -73.4%-8.2%-81.4% +13.0%
3 years ——-84.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year ——-46.1% +23.1%
5 years ——-90.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——-38.0% +11.0%

Risk

MeasurePUSASEGMSCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 114.6%31.6%108.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 116.4%31.2%124.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.290.90-1.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.64-0.26-0.75 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-48.2%-91.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.0%-22.5%-82.3% -1.8%
52-week high $7.82$29.18$4.36 $779.14
52-week low $1.87$18.23$0.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSASEGMSC
P/E now vs peer median -20.4xmedian 17.1x -2.3xmedian 17.1x -3.3xmedian 18.8x
P/S now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 1.9x 2.4xmedian 1.9x 0.2xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -9.3xmedian 10.9x -2.7xmedian 10.9x -0.4xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -42.6xmedian 11.4x -7.2xmedian 11.4x 1.2xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.5x 0.7xmedian 2.5x 0.3xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 —median 0.57 -0.07median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSASEGMSC
Revenue $3.21M $121.57M $684.09M
Gross profit – $8.70M $596.35M
Operating income -$6.56M -$123.06M $76.15M
Net income -$4.95M -$123.24M -$55.45M
Free cash flow -$2.38M -$40.19M $124.87M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $-9.74 $-0.23
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $117.80M $106.14M
Total debt – $38.05M $14.51M
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 12.80M 192.59M
Enterprise value -$40.43M -$126.42M -$224.33M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMSC
P/E -20.4x -2.3x -3.3x
P/FCF -42.6x -7.2x 1.2x
P/Operating cash flow -63.3x -7.2x 0.7x
P/S 31.5x 2.4x 0.2x
P/B 2.2x 0.7x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 0.7x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA -9.3x -2.7x -0.4x
EV/EBIT -8.9x -1.7x 0.7x
EV/Revenue 18.2x 1.7x 0.1x
EV/FCF -24.6x -5.2x 0.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -36.6x -5.2x 0.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMSC
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% 3.1% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 57.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 127.9% 1.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 90.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% -30.6% 27.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 34.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% -3.1% 22.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 42.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -2.3% 32.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 45.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% -15.5% 3.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 53.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% -15.5% -1.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 75.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMSC
Gross margin – 7.2% 87.2%
EBITDA margin -196.5% -64.6% -19.0%
Operating margin -204.1% -101.2% 11.1%
Pretax margin -159.4% -101.4% -7.0%
Net margin -154.2% -102.5% -6.5%
FCF margin -74.0% -33.1% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% -33.1% 31.2%
Return on equity -11.2% -29.5% -10.1%
Return on assets -10.9% -22.7% -2.0%
Return on invested capital – – 8.8%
Return on capital employed -14.6% – 3.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.3x -3.8x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 11.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMSC
Debt / assets – 7.0% 0.5%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x 0.7x
Debt / FCF – -0.9x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 23.8% 80.1%
Equity / assets 97.0% 76.2% 19.9%
Interest coverage – – 0.6x
Current ratio 52.4x – 0.8x
Quick ratio 52.1x – 0.7x
Cash ratio 52.0x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score 42.33 – -0.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMSC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -36.8% – –
Shareholder yield -36.8% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSASEGMSC
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.86FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $105.19MFY2026 $1.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -19.3%FY2026 +80.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +34.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSASEGMSC
Held by institutions 4.8% 86.8% 22.7%
Institutions holding 32 118 12
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +3.6% 0.0%
Institutions buying 27 52 2
Institutions selling 1 25 2
Buyers to sellers 27.00 2.08 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSASEGMSC
PUSA 1.00 0.10 -0.13
SEG 0.10 1.00 0.08
MSC -0.13 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, SEG and MSC?

Seaport Entertainment (SEG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $97.97M, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) $290.22M, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) $154.07M.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) +3.1%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Studio City International Holdings (MSC) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -102.5%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) -6.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Seaport Entertainment (SEG) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -73.4%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -8.2%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) -81.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 114.6%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) 31.6%, Studio City International Holdings (MSC) 108.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, SEG and MSC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.