PUSA vs SEG vs MLCO Stock Comparison

Powerus, Seaport Entertainment and Melco Resorts & Entertainment Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.80 -50.7% 1M -68.6% 1Y
Market cap
$89.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Melco Resorts & Entertainment leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Melco Resorts & Entertainment 3, Seaport Entertainment 3, Powerus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSASEGMLCOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.74M $290.93M $1.52B MLCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.1x -2.3x 6.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 10.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% +3.1% +5.2% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% -102.5% 5.0% MLCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 9.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x 30.2x SEG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -68.6% -7.0% -54.2% SEG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -19.2%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 110.4% 31.5% 39.2% SEG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 41/100 72/100 MLCO

Percentile Scorecard

PUSASEGMLCO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSASEGMLCO
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 19 #36 of 44 95 #3 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 48 #23 of 43 91 #5 of 43
Profitability 7 #39 of 42 5 #40 of 42 83 #8 of 42
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 94 #4 of 47 20 #38 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #28 of 28 – –
Overall 24 41 72
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • SEG ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MLCO ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSASEGMLCOSPY
1 month -50.7%-1.5%-20.1% +0.9%
3 months -35.5%-13.7%-34.4% +5.9%
6 months -53.5%+1.8%-32.2% +8.5%
Year to date -42.9%+14.9%-50.7% +13.3%
1 year -68.6%-7.0%-54.2% +12.4%
3 years ——-55.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year ——-23.7% +23.5%
5 years ——-65.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year ——-19.2% +11.0%
10 years ——-77.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——-14.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasurePUSASEGMLCOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 110.4%31.5%39.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 108.5%31.1%46.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.300.910.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.62-0.22-1.38 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-48.2%-74.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-22.1%-60.3% -0.9%
52-week high $6.73$29.18$9.39 $779.14
52-week low $1.80$18.23$3.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSASEGMLCO
P/E now vs peer median -18.1xmedian 16.8x -2.3xmedian 16.8x 6.3xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 1.9x 2.4xmedian 1.9x 0.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -7.4xmedian 10.2x -2.7xmedian 10.2x 40.2xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -37.8xmedian 11.2x -7.2xmedian 11.2x 3.0xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.2x 0.7xmedian 2.2x 172.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 —median 0.44 0.18median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSASEGMLCO
Revenue $3.21M $121.57M $4.69B
Gross profit – $8.70M $4.54B
Operating income -$6.56M -$123.06M $477.81M
Net income -$4.95M -$123.24M $196.16M
Free cash flow -$2.38M -$40.19M $506.29M
R&D – – $4.78M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $-9.74 $0.59
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $117.80M $454.26M
Total debt – $38.05M $5.07B
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 12.80M 400.63M
Enterprise value -$48.65M -$115.82M -$1.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMLCO
P/E -18.1x -2.3x 6.3x
P/FCF -37.8x -7.2x 3.0x
P/Operating cash flow -56.1x -7.2x 1.9x
P/S 27.9x 2.4x 0.3x
P/B 1.9x 0.7x 172.9x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 0.7x -8.7x
EV/EBITDA -7.4x -2.7x 40.2x
EV/EBIT -7.2x -1.7x 12.8x
EV/Revenue 14.6x 1.7x 1.3x
EV/FCF -19.8x -5.3x 12.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -29.4x -5.3x 7.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMLCO
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% 3.1% 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 35.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 127.9% 5.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 35.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% -30.6% 24.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 53.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% -3.1% 914.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 32.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -2.3% 347.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 34.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% -15.5% 3.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 84.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% -15.5% -3.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 38.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMLCO
Gross margin – 7.2% 96.6%
EBITDA margin -196.5% -64.6% 3.3%
Operating margin -204.1% -101.2% 10.2%
Pretax margin -159.4% -101.4% 4.0%
Net margin -154.2% -102.5% 5.0%
FCF margin -74.0% -33.1% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% -33.1% 16.9%
Return on equity -11.2% -29.5% 1,233%
Return on assets -10.9% -22.7% 3.2%
Return on invested capital – – 9.4%
Return on capital employed -14.6% – 9.4%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.3x 4.0x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 11.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMLCO
Debt / assets – 7.0% 80.3%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 578.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x 30.2x
Debt / FCF – -0.9x 10.0x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 23.8% 99.9%
Equity / assets 97.0% 76.2% 0.1%
Interest coverage – – 1.4x
Current ratio 52.4x – 1.0x
Quick ratio 52.1x – 1.0x
Cash ratio 52.0x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score 37.59 – 0.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSASEGMLCO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -41.5% – –
Shareholder yield -41.5% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSASEGMLCO
Forward P/E – – 10.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.86FY2026 $0.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -23.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +57.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $105.19MFY2026 $5.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -19.3%FY2026 +4.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +34.9% -8.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSASEGMLCO
Held by institutions 4.8% 86.8% 25.7%
Institutions holding 32 118 165
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +3.6% -6.1%
Institutions buying 27 52 84
Institutions selling 1 25 49
Buyers to sellers 27.00 2.08 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSASEGMLCO
PUSA 1.00 0.09 -0.03
SEG 0.09 1.00 0.13
MLCO -0.03 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, SEG and MLCO?

Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $89.74M, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) $290.93M, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) $1.52B.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) +3.1%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -102.5%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Seaport Entertainment (SEG) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -68.6%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) -7.0%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) -54.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 110.4%, Seaport Entertainment (SEG) 31.5%, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) 39.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, SEG and MLCO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.