PUSA vs PLAY vs MANU Stock Comparison

Powerus, Dave & Buster's Entertainment and Manchester United Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.91 -48.7% 1M -75.6% 1Y
Market cap
$89.49M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MANU Manchester United plc
$20.68 +1.5% 1M +13.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.59B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$909.31M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Manchester United leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Manchester United 7, Powerus 1, Dave & Buster's Entertainment 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSAPLAYMANULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.49M $265.95M $3.59B MANU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.1x -3.0x -62.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% -1.5% +5.5% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% -4.3% -6.4% PLAY
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.7% 2.6% MANU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.5x 2.4x MANU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -75.6% -57.2% +13.4% MANU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -27.3%/yr +4.9%/yr MANU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 114.5% 76.7% 33.6% MANU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 32/100 46/100 MANU

Percentile Scorecard

PUSAPLAYMANU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSAPLAYMANU
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 67 #15 of 44 30 #31 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 7 #40 of 43 76 #11 of 43
Profitability 8 #38 of 41 43 #24 of 41 53 #20 of 41
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 11 #42 of 47 24 #36 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #29 of 29 – –
Overall 24 32 46
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • PLAY ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MANU ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSAPLAYMANUSPY
1 month -48.7%+14.5%+1.5% -0.2%
3 months -33.2%-27.0%-11.5% +3.9%
6 months -51.4%-33.9%+18.3% +8.2%
Year to date -39.4%-53.2%+29.9% +12.9%
1 year -75.6%-57.2%+13.4% +12.3%
3 years —-78.1%+16.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-39.8%+5.3% +23.3%
5 years —-79.6%+26.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-27.3%+4.9% +10.9%
10 years —-81.2%+34.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-15.4%+3.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePUSAPLAYMANUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 114.5%76.7%33.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 116.3%80.5%32.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.261.580.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.750.40 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-90.7%-54.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.6%-64.2%-14.5% -1.2%
52-week high $7.82$21.17$24.19 $779.14
52-week low $1.87$6.38$15.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSAPLAYMANU
P/E now vs peer median -19.2xmedian 17.0x -3.0xmedian 17.0x -61.6xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 1.9x 0.1xmedian 1.9x 4.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.3xmedian 10.8x 5.3xmedian 10.8x 12.9xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -40.1xmedian 11.2x -16.5xmedian 11.2x 9.9xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.4x 3.0xmedian 2.4x 18.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 0.07median 0.56 3.64median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSAPLAYMANU
Revenue $3.21M $2.08B $909.31M
Gross profit – $1.78B -$21.12M
Operating income -$6.56M $36.20M $30.28M
Net income -$4.95M -$88.60M -$57.81M
Free cash flow -$2.38M -$16.00M $363.93M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $-2.55 $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $16.00M $89.13M
Total debt – $1.51B $3.96B
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 34.81M 172.43M
Enterprise value -$48.90M $200.15M $3.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSAPLAYMANU
P/E -19.2x -3.0x -61.6x
P/FCF -40.1x -16.5x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow -59.5x 0.8x 14.2x
P/S 29.6x 0.1x 4.0x
P/B 2.0x 3.0x 18.1x
P/Tangible book 2.0x -2.9x 18.1x
EV/EBITDA -8.3x 5.3x 12.9x
EV/EBIT -8.0x 48.5x 146.2x
EV/Revenue 16.3x 0.8x 4.9x
EV/FCF -22.1x -109.7x 12.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -32.8x 5.5x 17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.07 3.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSAPLAYMANU
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% -1.5% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.6% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -1.8% 24.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% -78.3% 223.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -50.9% 62.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% -1,013% -36.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -38.3% -19.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -1,022% -35.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -41.0% -16.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% 38.9% 128.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.6% 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% 94.9% 141.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.4% 34.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSAPLAYMANU
Gross margin – 85.4% -2.3%
EBITDA margin -196.5% 15.9% 37.6%
Operating margin -204.1% 1.7% 3.3%
Pretax margin -159.4% -5.6% -7.0%
Net margin -154.2% -4.3% -6.4%
FCF margin -74.0% -0.8% 40.0%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% 15.5% 27.8%
Return on equity -11.2% -94.5% -26.5%
Return on assets -10.9% -2.1% -2.8%
Return on invested capital – 1.7% 2.6%
Return on capital employed -14.6% 1.0% 2.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x -3.6x -4.4x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 0.6% 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSAPLAYMANU
Debt / assets – 36.6% 44.5%
Debt / equity – 17.2x 4.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.5x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – -94.2x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 97.9% 90.3%
Equity / assets 97.0% 2.1% 9.7%
Interest coverage – 0.2x 0.5x
Current ratio 52.4x 0.3x 0.3x
Quick ratio 52.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Cash ratio 52.0x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 39.86 0.69 0.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSAPLAYMANU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -39.1% – –
Shareholder yield -39.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSAPLAYMANU
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.62FY2026 $-0.18FY2027
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.03BFY2026 $1.07BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – -3.4%FY2026 +19.6%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% -6.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSAPLAYMANU
Held by institutions 4.8% 100.0% 17.1%
Institutions holding 32 171 125
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +2.6% +5.0%
Institutions buying 27 92 63
Institutions selling 1 56 30
Buyers to sellers 27.00 1.64 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSAPLAYMANU
PUSA 1.00 0.00 0.00
PLAY 0.00 1.00 0.17
MANU 0.00 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, PLAY and MANU?

Manchester United (MANU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $89.49M, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) $265.95M, Manchester United (MANU) $3.59B.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -1.5%, Manchester United (MANU) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -4.3%, Manchester United (MANU) -6.4%). On return on invested capital, Manchester United (MANU) leads (Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 1.7%, Manchester United (MANU) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manchester United (MANU) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -75.6%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -57.2%, Manchester United (MANU) +13.4%. Over five years, Manchester United (MANU) compounded fastest (Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -27.3%/yr, Manchester United (MANU) +4.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Manchester United (MANU) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 114.5%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 76.7%, Manchester United (MANU) 33.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, PLAY and MANU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Manchester United (MANU) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.