PUSA vs MTN vs RICK Stock Comparison

Powerus, Vail Resorts and Rci Hospitality Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$2.03 -45.4% 1M -73.4% 1Y
Market cap
$94.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MTN Vail Resorts Inc
$149.55 +9.9% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.39B
P/E
36.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Vail Resorts leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Vail Resorts 6, Rci Hospitality Holdings 3, Powerus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSAMTNRICKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $94.97M $5.39B $212.45M MTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.2x 36.6x -50.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.5x 4.3x RICK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% -4.3% +1.0% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% 5.2% -1.5% MTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.2% 0.0% MTN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.0x 4.9x MTN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -73.4% -2.0% +3.1% RICK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -15.4%/yr -16.4%/yr MTN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 114.6% 38.0% 42.0% MTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 49/100 53/100 RICK

Percentile Scorecard

PUSAMTNRICK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSAMTNRICK
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 40 #27 of 44 93 #4 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 24 #33 of 43 10 #39 of 43
Profitability 8 #38 of 41 78 #10 of 41 55 #19 of 41
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 30 #33 of 47 50 #24 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #28 of 28 72 #8 of 28 56 #13 of 28
Overall 24 49 53
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MTN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • RICK ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSAMTNRICKSPY
1 month -45.4%+9.9%-0.6% -0.8%
3 months -38.1%+0.9%+4.3% +3.5%
6 months -47.1%+24.1%+8.5% +7.0%
Year to date -35.6%+12.6%+14.9% +12.2%
1 year -73.4%-2.0%+3.1% +13.0%
3 years —-27.6%-48.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-10.2%-19.8% +23.1%
5 years —-56.7%-59.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-15.4%-16.4% +11.0%
10 years —-4.2%+141.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-0.4%+9.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePUSAMTNRICKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 114.6%38.0%42.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 116.4%36.2%39.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.290.461.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.64-0.050.07 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-68.0%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.0%-7.5%-12.6% -1.8%
52-week high $7.82$161.76$31.34 $779.14
52-week low $1.87$119.02$20.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSAMTNRICK
P/E now vs peer median -20.4xmedian 17.1x 36.2xmedian 17.1x -49.8xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x 0.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -9.3xmedian 10.9x 11.4xmedian 10.9x 9.6xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -42.6xmedian 11.4x 21.5xmedian 11.4x 6.0xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.5x 9.6xmedian 2.5x 0.9xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 -2.43median 0.57 1.73median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSAMTNRICK
Revenue $3.21M $2.84B $284.42M
Operating income -$6.56M $420.54M $27.29M
Net income -$4.95M $170.74M -$3.87M
Free cash flow -$2.38M $248.00M $34.75M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $4.12 $-0.55
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $231.35M $26.40M
Total debt – $3.19B $240.09M
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 35.79M 7.65M
Enterprise value -$43.42M $3.79B $96.81M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNRICK
P/E -20.4x 36.2x -49.8x
P/FCF -42.6x 21.5x 6.0x
P/Operating cash flow -63.3x 11.1x 4.9x
P/S 31.5x 1.9x 0.7x
P/B 2.2x 9.6x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 20.2x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA -9.3x 11.4x 9.6x
EV/EBIT -8.9x 19.6x 15.5x
EV/Revenue 18.2x 2.9x 1.5x
EV/FCF -24.6x 33.3x 12.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -36.6x 17.2x 9.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -2.43 1.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNRICK
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% -4.3% 1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% -24.9% -20.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -5.9% -24.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% -42.7% -123.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -15.5% -28.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -45.2% -129.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -14.9% -28.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% -13.6% -16.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.1% -13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% -22.4% 3.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.4% 9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNRICK
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin -196.5% 25.6% 15.4%
Operating margin -204.1% 14.8% 9.6%
Pretax margin -159.4% 8.0% 0.1%
Net margin -154.2% 5.2% -1.5%
FCF margin -74.0% 8.7% 12.2%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% 16.9% 15.0%
Return on equity -11.2% 23.2% -1.6%
Return on assets -10.9% 3.0% -0.7%
Return on invested capital – 8.2% 0.0%
Return on capital employed -14.6% 9.3% 5.4%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 2.8x -11.0x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 1.0% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNRICK
Debt / assets – 57.7% 42.1%
Debt / equity – 5.7x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.0x 4.9x
Debt / FCF – 12.8x 6.9x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 89.9% 58.3%
Equity / assets 97.0% 10.1% 41.7%
Interest coverage – 2.0x 1.6x
Current ratio 52.4x 0.8x 0.6x
Quick ratio 52.1x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash ratio 52.0x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 42.33 1.50 1.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNRICK
Dividend yield – 5.9% 1.1%
Net buyback yield -36.8% 0.8% 7.6%
Shareholder yield -36.8% 6.8% 8.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSAMTNRICK
Forward P/E – 27.5xFY2027 4.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.43FY2027 $6.30FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +31.8%FY2027 +412.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +15.3% -128.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.95BFY2027 $293.21MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.0%FY2027 +4.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +9.8% -6.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSAMTNRICK
Held by institutions 4.8% 100.0% 49.5%
Institutions holding 32 439 97
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +3.8% +3.3%
Institutions buying 27 226 51
Institutions selling 1 145 24
Buyers to sellers 27.00 1.56 2.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSAMTNRICK
PUSA 1.00 -0.01 0.05
MTN -0.01 1.00 0.21
RICK 0.05 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, MTN and RICK?

Vail Resorts (MTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $94.97M, Vail Resorts (MTN) $5.39B, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) $212.45M.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.3%, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.2%, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) -1.5%). On return on invested capital, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads (Vail Resorts (MTN) 8.2%, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -73.4%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -2.0%, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) +3.1%. Over five years, Vail Resorts (MTN) compounded fastest (Vail Resorts (MTN) -15.4%/yr, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) -16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vail Resorts (MTN) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 114.6%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 38.0%, Rci Hospitality Holdings (RICK) 42.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, MTN and RICK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.