PUSA vs MTN vs LUCK Stock Comparison

Powerus, Vail Resorts and Lucky Strike Entertainment Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.80 -50.7% 1M -68.6% 1Y
Market cap
$89.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MTN Vail Resorts Inc
$151.93 +10.0% 1M -0.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.41B
P/E
36.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
5.84%
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Vail Resorts leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Vail Resorts 7, Lucky Strike Entertainment 2, Powerus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSAMTNLUCKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.74M $5.41B $550.63M MTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.1x 36.8x -11.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 28.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% -4.3% +3.7% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% 5.2% -3.7% MTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.2% 9.0% LUCK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.0x 6.5x MTN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 5.84% 5.96% LUCK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -68.6% -0.4% -50.4% MTN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -15.1%/yr -16.7%/yr MTN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 110.4% 37.8% 55.1% MTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 46/100 44/100 MTN

Percentile Scorecard

PUSAMTNLUCK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSAMTNLUCK
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 37 #28 of 44 58 #19 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 29 #31 of 43 14 #37 of 43
Profitability 7 #39 of 42 73 #12 of 42 46 #23 of 42
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 33 #32 of 47 9 #43 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #28 of 28 59 #12 of 28 91 #3 of 28
Overall 24 46 44
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MTN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LUCK ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSAMTNLUCKSPY
1 month -50.7%+10.0%-24.5% +0.9%
3 months -35.5%-5.1%-42.7% +5.9%
6 months -53.5%+24.4%-46.5% +8.5%
Year to date -42.9%+14.4%-52.4% +13.3%
1 year -68.6%-0.4%-50.4% +12.4%
3 years —-26.4%-61.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year —-9.7%-27.0% +23.5%
5 years —-55.9%-59.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-15.1%-16.7% +11.0%
10 years —-3.0%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —-0.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasurePUSAMTNLUCKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 110.4%37.8%55.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 108.5%36.0%60.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.300.471.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.62-0.01-0.91 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-68.0%-76.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-6.1%-57.5% -0.9%
52-week high $6.73$161.76$9.49 $779.14
52-week low $1.80$119.02$4.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSAMTNLUCK
P/E now vs peer median -18.1xmedian 16.8x 36.8xmedian 16.8x -11.8xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -7.4xmedian 10.2x 11.5xmedian 10.2x 8.5xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -37.8xmedian 11.2x 21.8xmedian 11.2x -56.3xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.2x 9.7xmedian 2.2x -1.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 -2.47median 0.44 0.26median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSAMTNLUCK
Revenue $3.21M $2.84B $1.25B
Gross profit – – $844.13M
Operating income -$6.56M $420.54M $136.79M
Net income -$4.95M $170.74M -$35.78M
Free cash flow -$2.38M $248.00M -$9.78M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $4.12 $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $231.35M –
Total debt – $3.19B $1.78B
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 35.79M 136.63M
Enterprise value -$48.65M $4.12B $550.63M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNLUCK
P/E -18.1x 36.8x -11.8x
P/FCF -37.8x 21.8x -56.3x
P/Operating cash flow -56.1x 11.3x 5.3x
P/S 27.9x 1.9x 0.4x
P/B 1.9x 9.7x -1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 20.5x -1.2x
EV/EBITDA -7.4x 11.5x 8.5x
EV/EBIT -7.2x 19.8x 17.0x
EV/Revenue 14.6x 2.9x 1.9x
EV/FCF -19.8x 33.6x -238.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -29.4x 17.4x 22.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -2.47 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNLUCK
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% -4.3% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% 5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 2.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 35.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% -24.9% -0.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -5.9% -12.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% -42.7% -257.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -15.5% -34.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -45.2% -154.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -14.9% -46.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% -13.6% -41.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.1% -21.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% -22.4% -127.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.4% -28.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNLUCK
Gross margin – – 67.8%
EBITDA margin -196.5% 25.6% 22.0%
Operating margin -204.1% 14.8% 11.0%
Pretax margin -159.4% 8.0% -3.2%
Net margin -154.2% 5.2% -3.7%
FCF margin -74.0% 8.7% -0.8%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% 16.9% 8.3%
Return on equity -11.2% 23.2% –
Return on assets -10.9% 3.0% -1.1%
Return on invested capital – 8.2% 9.0%
Return on capital employed -14.6% 9.3% 4.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 2.8x -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 1.0% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNLUCK
Debt / assets – 57.7% 55.2%
Debt / equity – 5.7x -4.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.0x 6.5x
Debt / FCF – 12.8x -182.1x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 89.9% 112.3%
Equity / assets 97.0% 10.1% -12.3%
Interest coverage – 2.0x –
Current ratio 52.4x 0.8x 0.5x
Quick ratio 52.1x 0.6x –
Cash ratio 52.0x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 37.59 1.51 0.43

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSAMTNLUCK
Dividend yield – 5.8% 6.0%
Net buyback yield -41.5% 0.8% 6.4%
Shareholder yield -41.5% 6.7% 12.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSAMTNLUCK
Forward P/E – 28.0xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.43FY2027 $-0.06FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +31.8%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after – +15.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $2.95BFY2027 $1.22BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.0%FY2027 -2.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +9.8% +14.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSAMTNLUCK
Held by institutions 4.8% 100.0% 50.3%
Institutions holding 32 439 55
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% +3.8% -0.8%
Institutions buying 27 226 24
Institutions selling 1 145 20
Buyers to sellers 27.00 1.56 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSAMTNLUCK
PUSA 1.00 0.00 -0.01
MTN 0.00 1.00 0.26
LUCK -0.01 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, MTN and LUCK?

Vail Resorts (MTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $89.74M, Vail Resorts (MTN) $5.41B, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) $550.63M.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.3%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.2%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -3.7%). On return on invested capital, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) leads (Vail Resorts (MTN) 8.2%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vail Resorts (MTN) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -68.6%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -0.4%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -50.4%. Over five years, Vail Resorts (MTN) compounded fastest (Vail Resorts (MTN) -15.1%/yr, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -16.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) has the highest dividend yield: Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.84%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 5.96%. Powerus (PUSA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vail Resorts (MTN) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 110.4%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 37.8%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 55.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, MTN and LUCK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.