PUSA vs ESBA vs PLAY Stock Comparison

Powerus, Empire State Realty OP and Dave & Buster's Entertainment Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.91 -48.7% 1M -75.6% 1Y
Market cap
$95.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Empire State Realty OP leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Empire State Realty OP 6, Dave & Buster's Entertainment 2, Powerus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUSAESBAPLAYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.22M $1.31B $264.16M ESBA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -19.2x 259.5x -3.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% +2.0% -1.5% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -154.2% 0.6% -4.3% ESBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -1.1% 1.7% PLAY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.0x 4.5x PLAY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 3.28% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -75.6% -36.1% -57.2% ESBA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -13.2%/yr -27.3%/yr ESBA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 114.5% 51.7% 76.7% ESBA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 33/100 32/100 ESBA

Percentile Scorecard

PUSAESBAPLAY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUSAESBAPLAY
Valuation 12 #39 of 44 69 #46 of 145 67 #15 of 44
Growth 0 #43 of 43 2 #138 of 141 7 #40 of 43
Profitability 8 #38 of 41 27 #98 of 134 43 #24 of 41
Financial Health 100 #1 of 47 57 #60 of 138 11 #42 of 47
Shareholder Returns 0 #29 of 29 12 #116 of 131 –
Overall 24 33 32
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • ESBA ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • PLAY ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUSAESBAPLAYSPY
1 month -48.7%+22.0%+14.5% -0.2%
3 months -33.2%-12.9%-27.0% +3.9%
6 months -51.4%-14.1%-33.9% +8.2%
Year to date -39.4%-22.5%-53.2% +12.9%
1 year -75.6%-36.1%-57.2% +12.3%
3 years —-38.1%-78.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-14.8%-39.8% +23.3%
5 years —-50.6%-79.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-13.2%-27.3% +10.9%
10 years —-74.7%-81.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-12.9%-15.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePUSAESBAPLAYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 114.5%51.7%76.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 116.3%61.1%80.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.260.421.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.66-0.70-0.75 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.9%-66.4%-90.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -75.6%-37.0%-64.2% -1.2%
52-week high $7.82$7.75$21.17 $779.14
52-week low $1.87$3.85$6.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUSAESBAPLAY
P/E now vs peer median -19.2xmedian 17.0x 259.5xmedian 26.3x -3.0xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 1.9x 1.7xmedian 4.0x 0.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.3xmedian 10.8x 12.6xmedian 14.4x 5.3xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -40.1xmedian 11.2x -3.0xmedian 23.3x -16.5xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.4x 0.7xmedian 1.3x 3.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 -4.34median 1.91 0.07median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUSAESBAPLAY
Revenue $3.21M $784.18M $2.08B
Gross profit – – $1.78B
Operating income -$6.56M -$34.52M $36.20M
Net income -$4.95M $9.26M -$88.60M
Free cash flow -$2.38M -$437.31M -$16.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $0.02 $-2.55
Cash & equivalents $22.20M $85.61M $16.00M
Total debt – $4.54B $1.51B
Shares (diluted) 49.86M 268.95M 34.81M
Enterprise value -$43.17M $871.27M $198.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUSAESBAPLAY
P/E -19.2x 259.5x -3.0x
P/FCF -40.1x -3.0x -16.5x
P/Operating cash flow -59.5x 5.8x 0.8x
P/S 29.6x 1.7x 0.1x
P/B 2.0x 0.7x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 0.7x -2.9x
EV/EBITDA -8.3x 12.6x 5.3x
EV/EBIT -8.0x -63.2x 48.5x
EV/Revenue 16.3x 2.8x 0.8x
EV/FCF -22.1x -5.0x -109.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -32.8x 9.6x 5.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -4.34 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUSAESBAPLAY
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% 2.0% -1.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% -1.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -922.9% -123.1% -78.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -31.0% -50.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -960.6% -86.5% -1,013%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -51.3% -38.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -195.3% -92.1% -1,022%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -59.8% -41.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -149.0% -13.3% 38.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.8% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -139.7% -169.4% 94.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -149.9% -28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUSAESBAPLAY
Gross margin – – 85.4%
EBITDA margin -196.5% 22.1% 15.9%
Operating margin -204.1% -4.4% 1.7%
Pretax margin -159.4% 1.3% -5.6%
Net margin -154.2% 0.6% -4.3%
FCF margin -74.0% -55.8% -0.8%
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% 29.0% 15.5%
Return on equity -11.2% 0.5% -94.5%
Return on assets -10.9% 0.2% -2.1%
Return on invested capital – -1.1% 1.7%
Return on capital employed -14.6% – 1.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 24.6x -3.6x
Stock comp / revenue 106.7% 3.9% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUSAESBAPLAY
Debt / assets – 22.4% 36.6%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 17.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.0x 4.5x
Debt / FCF – -2.2x -94.2x
Liabilities / assets 3.0% 58.1% 97.9%
Equity / assets 97.0% 41.9% 2.1%
Interest coverage – -0.3x 0.2x
Current ratio 52.4x – 0.3x
Quick ratio 52.1x – 0.1x
Cash ratio 52.0x – 0.0x
Altman Z-score 39.86 – 0.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUSAESBAPLAY
Dividend yield – 3.3% –
Net buyback yield -39.1% – –
Shareholder yield -39.1% 3.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUSAESBAPLAY
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-1.62FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $2.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -3.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUSAESBAPLAY
Held by institutions 4.8% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 32 – 171
Change in shares held, QoQ +209.7% – +2.6%
Institutions buying 27 – 92
Institutions selling 1 – 56
Buyers to sellers 27.00 – 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUSAESBAPLAY
PUSA 1.00 -0.01 -0.01
ESBA -0.01 1.00 0.13
PLAY -0.01 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUSA, ESBA and PLAY?

Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Powerus (PUSA) $95.22M, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) $1.31B, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) $264.16M.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) +2.0%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -1.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) has the highest net margin (Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) 0.6%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -4.3%). On return on invested capital, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) leads (Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) -1.1%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 1.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) returned the most: Powerus (PUSA) -75.6%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) -36.1%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -57.2%. Over five years, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) compounded fastest (Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) -13.2%/yr, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -27.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) 3.28%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 0.00%. Powerus (PUSA) and Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) has been the steadiest (Powerus (PUSA) 114.5%, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) 51.7%, Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 76.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUSA, ESBA and PLAY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Empire State Realty OP (ESBA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.