PUK vs MET vs EQH Stock Comparison

Prudential, Metlife and Equitable Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUK Prudential Plc
$24.39 -3.3% 1M -12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$31.77B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Life Insurance Financial Services
MET Metlife Inc
$100.83 +5.9% 1M +28.7% 1Y
Market cap
$64.44B
P/E
18.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.40B
Div. yield
0.02%
Life Insurance Financial Services
7 wins
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc.
$54.62 +4.6% 1M +14.7% 1Y
Market cap
$14.77B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$10.62B
Div. yield
0.02%
Life Insurance Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Metlife leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Metlife 7, Equitable Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUKMETEQHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $31.77B $64.44B $14.77B MET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 18.7x -15.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.8x 10.2x 8.0x EQH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +8.7% -22.1% MET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.3% -9.3% MET
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -101.9% -6.4% EQH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% MET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.3% +28.7% +14.7% MET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.0%/yr +9.9%/yr +10.3%/yr EQH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.0% 23.9% 33.6% MET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 38/100 21/100 MET

Percentile Scorecard

PUKMETEQH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUKMETEQH
Valuation – 57 #52 of 119 14 #103 of 119
Growth – 19 #93 of 114 4 #110 of 114
Profitability – 17 #88 of 106 9 #97 of 106
Financial Health 69 #33 of 104 56 #46 of 104 7 #97 of 104
Shareholder Returns 43 #60 of 105 42 #61 of 105 72 #30 of 105
Overall – 38 21
  • PUK ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MET ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • EQH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUKMETEQHSPY
1 month -3.3%+5.9%+4.6% +0.7%
3 months -21.3%+3.9%+11.7% +3.7%
6 months -19.3%+25.9%+29.4% +7.1%
Year to date -21.6%+27.7%+14.6% +12.8%
1 year -12.3%+28.7%+14.7% +11.9%
3 years +15.9%+69.7%+107.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +5.0%+19.3%+27.6% +22.8%
5 years -40.9%+60.6%+63.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -10.0%+9.9%+10.3% +10.9%
10 years -24.1%+140.8%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -2.7%+9.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePUKMETEQHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.0%23.9%33.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.4%24.2%37.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.220.641.18 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.421.200.44 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.1%-36.2%-37.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.4%-2.6%-0.7% -1.2%
52-week high $33.61$103.55$55.03 $779.14
52-week low $23.53$67.70$35.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUKMETEQH
P/E now vs peer median —median 10.7x 18.8xmedian 10.7x -15.5xmedian 10.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.4x 0.8xmedian 1.4x 1.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.5x —median 7.5x —median 7.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 8.5x 4.3xmedian 8.5x 11.3xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.5x 2.3xmedian 1.5x 17.4xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.60 1.79median 0.60 0.37median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUKMETEQH
Revenue – $79.40B $10.62B
Gross profit – $29.06B $8.95B
Operating income – -$45.48B -$384.00M
Net income – $3.66B -$816.00M
Free cash flow – $14.81B $1.32B
EPS (diluted) – $5.32 $-3.53
Cash & equivalents $5.89B $19.30B $17.18B
Total debt $16.00M $5.89B $3.84B
Shares (diluted) 1.30B 646.90M 278.30M
Enterprise value -$721.74B -$42.34B -$44.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUKMETEQH
P/E – 18.8x -15.5x
P/FCF – 4.3x 11.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 4.1x 11.0x
P/S – 0.8x 1.4x
P/B 1.5x 2.3x 17.4x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 2.3x 17.4x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – -0.9x 0.5x
EV/Revenue – 0.5x 0.0x
EV/FCF – 2.9x -0.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 2.8x -0.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.79 0.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUKMETEQH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 8.7% -22.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.3% 3.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.5% -16.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% 9.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -13.6% -131.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% -29.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – -14.9% -220.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 4.1% -34.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – -12.2% -366.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 10.5% -41.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 2.2% -14.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% 176.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 2.0% -12.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.1% 124.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUKMETEQH
Gross margin – 36.6% 84.3%
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – -57.3% -3.6%
Pretax margin – 6.1% -5.7%
Net margin – 4.3% -9.3%
FCF margin – 18.7% 12.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 19.6% 12.8%
Return on equity – 13.2% -38.7%
Return on assets – 0.5% -0.2%
Return on invested capital – -101.9% -6.4%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 4.3x -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUKMETEQH
Debt / assets 0.0% 0.8% 1.1%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.2x 4.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 0.4x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 90.8% 96.3% 99.7%
Equity / assets 9.2% 3.7% 0.3%
Interest coverage – -4.7x -1.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUKMETEQH
Dividend yield 2.3% 2.3% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – 3.8% 11.0%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 6.1% 13.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.2% -38.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.2% 24.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.6% 3.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.6% 2.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUKMETEQH
Forward P/E 10.8xFY2026 10.2xFY2026 8.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.25FY2026 $9.86FY2026 $6.87FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.8%FY2026 +11.7%FY2026 +21.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.4% +7.9% +23.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.28BFY2026 $83.11BFY2026 $16.47BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +112.9%FY2026 +7.8%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.8% -2.6% +8.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUKMETEQH
Held by institutions 2.9% 75.7% 95.4%
Institutions holding 283 1,443 482
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +0.7% +14.2%
Institutions buying 153 724 214
Institutions selling 96 483 205
Buyers to sellers 1.59 1.50 1.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUKMETEQH
PUK 1.00 0.36 0.37
MET 0.36 1.00 0.64
EQH 0.37 0.64 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUK, MET and EQH?

Metlife (MET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Prudential (PUK) $31.77B, Metlife (MET) $64.44B, Equitable Holdings (EQH) $14.77B.

Which company is growing faster?

Metlife (MET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Metlife (MET) +8.7%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) -22.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Metlife (MET) has the highest net margin (Metlife (MET) 4.3%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) -9.3%). On return on invested capital, Equitable Holdings (EQH) leads (Metlife (MET) -101.9%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) -6.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Metlife (MET) returned the most: Prudential (PUK) -12.3%, Metlife (MET) +28.7%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) +14.7%. Over five years, Equitable Holdings (EQH) compounded fastest (Prudential (PUK) -10.0%/yr, Metlife (MET) +9.9%/yr, Equitable Holdings (EQH) +10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Metlife (MET) has the highest dividend yield: Prudential (PUK) 0.00%, Metlife (MET) 0.02%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) 0.02%. Prudential (PUK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Metlife (MET) has been the steadiest (Prudential (PUK) 29.0%, Metlife (MET) 23.9%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) 33.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUK, MET and EQH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Metlife (MET) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.