PRLB vs GE vs NNDM Stock Comparison

Proto Labs, General Electric and Nano Dimension Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PRLB Proto Labs Inc
$85.54 -4.2% 1M +54.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.07B
P/E
67.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$560.54M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
3 wins
GE General Electric Co
$285.64 -10.7% 1M -6.8% 1Y
Market cap
$298.78B
P/E
32.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$52.58B
Div. yield
0.01%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
6 wins
NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd.
$1.35 -14.0% 1M -21.1% 1Y
Market cap
$294.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$120.89M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

General Electric leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (General Electric 6, Proto Labs 3, Nano Dimension 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPRLBGENNDMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.07B $298.78B $294.13M GE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 67.8x 32.8x -0.7x GE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.4x 38.6x — PRLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% +19.6% +73.5% NNDM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.4% 17.3% -349.5% GE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -57.8% -28.1% NNDM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.5x 2.4x GE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.8% -6.8% -21.1% PRLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.7%/yr +34.6%/yr -24.7%/yr GE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.8% 33.1% 53.1% GE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 45/100 48/100 PRLB

Percentile Scorecard

PRLBGENNDM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPRLBGENNDM
Valuation 34 #135 of 203 32 #68 of 100 39 #125 of 203
Growth 83 #32 of 188 28 #70 of 97 55 #85 of 188
Profitability 52 #91 of 187 59 #40 of 96 7 #174 of 187
Financial Health 96 #11 of 222 19 #86 of 106 91 #20 of 222
Shareholder Returns 32 #104 of 153 86 #10 of 65 –
Overall 59 45 48
  • PRLB ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • GE ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NNDM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPRLBGENNDMSPY
1 month -4.2%-10.7%-14.0% -1.0%
3 months +9.2%-19.2%-8.2% +2.9%
6 months +32.4%+0.4%-25.0% +6.4%
Year to date +69.1%-7.3%-12.3% +11.4%
1 year +54.8%-6.8%-21.1% +13.1%
3 years +251.1%+215.0%-53.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +52.0%+46.6%-22.2% +21.5%
5 years +19.7%+340.7%-75.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +3.7%+34.6%-24.7% +10.9%
10 years +59.8%+105.7%-97.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +4.8%+7.5%-32.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePRLBGENNDMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.8%33.1%53.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.7%35.1%57.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.031.211.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.17-0.20-0.40 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.4%-45.1%-80.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.3%-25.0%-36.9% -2.5%
52-week high $98.64$381.07$2.14 $779.14
52-week low $46.81$273.25$1.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePRLBGENNDM
P/E now vs peer median 67.3xmedian 25.9x 32.5xmedian 26.2x -0.7xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 1.9x 5.6xmedian 2.9x 2.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 13.7x -13.0xmedian 14.7x 0.4xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 21.1x 36.9xmedian 24.9x -5.5xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.3x 16.6xmedian 2.4x 0.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.10median 1.19 -113.70median 0.92 0.00median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPRLBGENNDM
Revenue $560.54M $52.58B $120.89M
Gross profit $254.60M $18.52B $46.88M
Operating income $36.81M -$24.73B -$143.53M
Net income $30.48M $9.13B -$139.91M
Free cash flow $56.66M $7.99B -$51.44M
R&D $42.36M $1.81B $29.99M
EPS (diluted) $1.25 $8.74 $-2.02
Cash & equivalents $127.92M $8.76B $349.11M
Total debt – $79.60B $14.82M
Shares (diluted) 24.42M 1.04B 209.34M
Enterprise value $1.54B $257.30B -$917.04M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPRLBGENNDM
P/E 67.3x 32.5x -0.7x
P/FCF 36.1x 36.9x -5.5x
P/Operating cash flow 26.1x 31.3x -5.6x
P/S 3.7x 5.6x 2.4x
P/B 3.0x 16.6x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 21.5x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 27.4x -13.0x 0.4x
EV/EBIT 51.7x -12.4x 0.4x
EV/Revenue 3.4x 5.8x -0.5x
EV/FCF 33.6x 38.3x 1.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.2x 32.4x 1.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.10 -113.70 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPRLBGENNDM
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% 19.6% 73.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 7.2% 32.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.3% 11.7% 88.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.8% 10.9% 27.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 121.9% -29.4% -9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.2% -126.8% -35.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 105.8% 13.2% -154.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.6% -3.4% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 103.1% 15.5% -112.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.0% -0.3% -428.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.6% 21.4% 25.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 6.3% 21.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -14.0% 20.1% 28.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.9% 2.7% 17.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPRLBGENNDM
Gross margin 45.4% 35.2% 38.8%
EBITDA margin 12.4% -44.6% -117.1%
Operating margin 6.6% -47.0% -118.7%
Pretax margin 7.6% 20.3% -121.7%
Net margin 5.4% 17.3% -349.5%
FCF margin 10.1% 15.2% -42.6%
Operating cash flow margin 14.0% 17.9% -41.9%
Return on equity 4.4% 51.2% -33.8%
Return on assets 3.9% 7.2% -28.9%
Return on invested capital – -57.8% -28.1%
Return on capital employed 5.2% -29.1% -27.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x 1.0x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 2.6% – 6.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPRLBGENNDM
Debt / assets – 15.2% 0.6%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.5x 2.4x
Debt / FCF – 2.4x -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 12.6% 86.0% 13.5%
Equity / assets 87.4% 14.0% 86.5%
Interest coverage – -26.7x -341.7x
Current ratio 3.6x 1.0x 10.7x
Quick ratio 3.2x 0.6x 8.0x
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.2x 7.5x
Altman Z-score 13.94 2.40 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPRLBGENNDM
Dividend yield – 0.6% –
Net buyback yield 0.6% 2.9% –
Shareholder yield 0.6% 3.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 26.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 36.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPRLBGENNDM
Forward P/E 37.4xFY2026 38.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.29FY2026 $7.40FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +38.0%FY2026 +16.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% +28.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $612.12MFY2026 $53.75BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +14.8%FY2026 +27.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.8% +11.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPRLBGENNDM
Held by institutions 93.7% 79.4% 31.9%
Institutions holding 276 3,441 107
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% +1.5% +13.9%
Institutions buying 145 1,829 51
Institutions selling 89 1,148 25
Buyers to sellers 1.63 1.59 2.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PRLBGENNDM
PRLB 1.00 0.35 0.31
GE 0.35 1.00 0.18
NNDM 0.31 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PRLB, GE and NNDM?

General Electric (GE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Proto Labs (PRLB) $2.07B, General Electric (GE) $298.78B, Nano Dimension (NNDM) $294.13M.

Which stock is cheaper, PRLB, GE and NNDM?

General Electric (GE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Proto Labs (PRLB) 67.8x, General Electric (GE) 32.8x, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -0.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Proto Labs (PRLB) is cheapest (Proto Labs (PRLB) 37.4x, General Electric (GE) 38.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano Dimension (NNDM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Proto Labs (PRLB) +10.2%, General Electric (GE) +19.6%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) +73.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

General Electric (GE) has the highest net margin (Proto Labs (PRLB) 5.4%, General Electric (GE) 17.3%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -349.5%). On return on invested capital, Nano Dimension (NNDM) leads (General Electric (GE) -57.8%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -28.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Proto Labs (PRLB) returned the most: Proto Labs (PRLB) +54.8%, General Electric (GE) -6.8%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -21.1%. Over five years, General Electric (GE) compounded fastest (Proto Labs (PRLB) +3.7%/yr, General Electric (GE) +34.6%/yr, Nano Dimension (NNDM) -24.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Proto Labs (PRLB) 0.00%, General Electric (GE) 0.01%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 0.00%. Proto Labs (PRLB) and Nano Dimension (NNDM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, General Electric (GE) has been the steadiest (Proto Labs (PRLB) 46.8%, General Electric (GE) 33.1%, Nano Dimension (NNDM) 53.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PRLB, GE and NNDM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, General Electric (GE) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.