PPSI vs XCH vs BLNK Stock Comparison

Pioneer Power Solutions, Xchg and Blink Charging Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
XCH XCHG Ltd
$2.44 -21.3% 1M +51.6% 1Y
Market cap
$17.38M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.41 -26.8% 1M -76.2% 1Y
Market cap
$58.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Blink Charging leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Blink Charging 2, Pioneer Power Solutions 2, Xchg 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPPSIXCHBLNKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.41M $17.38M $58.95M BLNK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — — -1.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -46.5% — -5.9% BLNK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -52.5% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -100.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -41.2% +51.6% -76.2% XCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.2%/yr — -58.1%/yr PPSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.9% 329.6% 82.6% PPSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 55/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

PPSIXCHBLNK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPPSIXCHBLNK
Valuation 78 #14 of 61 – 38 #38 of 61
Growth – – 90 #7 of 58
Profitability – – 41 #33 of 55
Financial Health 84 #12 of 71 30 #50 of 71 51 #35 of 71
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – – 55
  • PPSI ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • XCH ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • BLNK ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPPSIXCHBLNKSPY
1 month -19.7%-21.3%-26.8% +0.9%
3 months -4.7%+430.4%-12.8% +5.9%
6 months -27.4%+154.2%-42.3% +8.5%
Year to date -44.0%+115.9%-38.8% +13.3%
1 year -41.2%+51.6%-76.2% +12.4%
3 years -48.4%—-82.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year -19.8%—-44.1% +23.5%
5 years -23.4%—-98.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -5.2%—-58.1% +11.0%
10 years -48.0%—-97.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year -6.3%—-31.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasurePPSIXCHBLNKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.9%329.6%82.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.3%135.3%81.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.470.743.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.520.16-0.92 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.9%-99.2%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.4%-47.2%-76.2% -0.9%
52-week high $6.08$4.62$1.72 $779.14
52-week low $2.33$0.23$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePPSIXCHBLNK
P/E now vs peer median —median 29.4x —median 29.4x -1.2xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.4x —median 18.4x -0.6xmedian 18.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 24.4x —median 24.4x -4.6xmedian 24.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.8x 1.7xmedian 1.8x 1.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 —median 1.07 -0.03median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPPSIXCHBLNK
Revenue $16.72M – $96.55M
Gross profit – – $28.68M
Operating income – – -$51.16M
Net income – – -$48.32M
Free cash flow – – -$12.82M
EPS (diluted) – – $-0.35
Cash & equivalents $10.67M $11.41M $34.00M
Total debt – $29.61M $265.00K
Shares (diluted) 11.10M 3.50M 144.26M
Enterprise value -$27.14M -$51.05M -$75.72M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPPSIXCHBLNK
P/E – – -1.2x
P/FCF – – -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow – – -10.3x
P/S 1.8x – 0.6x
P/B 1.2x 1.7x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 1.7x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – – -0.6x
EV/EBIT – – -0.5x
EV/Revenue 1.1x – 0.3x
EV/FCF – – -2.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -4.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPPSIXCHBLNK
Revenue growth (1Y) -46.5% – -5.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -22.9% – 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 12.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 76.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 25.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 77.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 27.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 83.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 44.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 88.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 63.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 76.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 53.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPPSIXCHBLNK
Gross margin – – 29.7%
EBITDA margin – – -43.6%
Operating margin – – -53.0%
Pretax margin – – -49.8%
Net margin – – -52.5%
FCF margin – – -13.3%
Operating cash flow margin – – -5.9%
Return on equity – – -99.5%
Return on assets – – -39.7%
Return on invested capital – – -100.0%
Return on capital employed – – -76.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 3.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPPSIXCHBLNK
Debt / assets – 19.7% 0.2%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.8x
Debt / FCF – – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 21.5% 74.7% 60.9%
Equity / assets 78.5% 25.3% 39.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 4.1x 1.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio 2.7x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.9x 0.4x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – – -9.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPPSIXCHBLNK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPPSIXCHBLNK
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.62FY2026 $-2.46FY2026 $-0.21FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.58MFY2026 $34.13MFY2026 $90.27MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -11.0%FY2026 +36.0%FY2026 -12.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.0% +27.9% +20.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPPSIXCHBLNK
Held by institutions 13.3% – 12.1%
Institutions holding 35 – 113
Change in shares held, QoQ +44.7% – -26.4%
Institutions buying 19 – 37
Institutions selling 4 – 27
Buyers to sellers 4.75 – 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PPSIXCHBLNK
PPSI 1.00 0.03 0.33
XCH 0.03 1.00 0.08
BLNK 0.33 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PPSI, XCH and BLNK?

Blink Charging (BLNK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) $29.41M, Xchg (XCH) $17.38M, Blink Charging (BLNK) $58.95M.

Which company is growing faster?

Blink Charging (BLNK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) -46.5%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xchg (XCH) returned the most: Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) -41.2%, Xchg (XCH) +51.6%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -76.2%. Over five years, Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) compounded fastest (Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) -5.2%/yr, Blink Charging (BLNK) -58.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) has been the steadiest (Pioneer Power Solutions (PPSI) 78.9%, Xchg (XCH) 329.6%, Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PPSI, XCH and BLNK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Blink Charging (BLNK) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.