PLXS vs TTMI vs JBL Stock Comparison

Plexus, Ttm Technologies and Jabil Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PLXS Plexus Corp
$230.29 -12.5% 1M +60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.14B
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.60B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$86.78 -32.8% 1M +47.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.14B
P/E
38.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
5 wins
JBL Jabil Inc
$283.43 -10.5% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$29.61B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.95B
Div. yield
0.11%
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 5, Jabil 3, Plexus 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPLXSTTMIJBLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.14B $9.14B $29.61B JBL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.2x 38.2x 28.8x JBL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.6x 16.4x 16.4x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.2% +27.6% +20.6% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% 7.0% 2.9% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.3% 10.6% 25.9% JBL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 1.0x 0.7x PLXS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.11% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +60.7% +47.3% +34.2% PLXS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +21.4%/yr +46.2%/yr +36.4%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.4% 90.4% 47.7% PLXS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 60/100 58/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

PLXSTTMIJBL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPLXSTTMIJBL
Valuation 53 #53 of 112 52 #54 of 112 71 #33 of 112
Growth 45 #60 of 109 88 #14 of 109 67 #37 of 109
Profitability 54 #48 of 104 61 #41 of 104 67 #35 of 104
Financial Health 41 #69 of 116 37 #74 of 116 18 #95 of 116
Shareholder Returns 69 #26 of 81 – 66 #28 of 81
Overall 53 60 58
  • PLXS ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • JBL ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPLXSTTMIJBLSPY
1 month -12.5%-32.8%-10.5% -0.2%
3 months -7.9%-20.2%-6.5% +3.9%
6 months -6.5%-36.9%-14.3% +8.2%
Year to date +56.7%+25.8%+24.3% +12.9%
1 year +60.7%+47.3%+34.2% +12.3%
3 years +143.2%+653.3%+131.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +34.5%+96.1%+32.3% +23.3%
5 years +163.3%+566.0%+372.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +21.4%+46.2%+36.4% +10.9%
10 years +407.4%+536.2%+1,216.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year +17.6%+20.3%+29.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePLXSTTMIJBLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.4%90.4%47.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.0%97.7%52.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.733.812.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.470.520.72 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.9%-66.6%-36.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.2%-60.8%-26.5% -1.2%
52-week high $303.82$221.47$385.63 $779.14
52-week low $132.74$58.45$192.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePLXSTTMIJBL
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 33.2x 38.2xmedian 33.2x 28.8xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.8x 2.7xmedian 2.8x 0.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 20.0x 19.6xmedian 20.0x 13.1xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 99.3xmedian 29.8x -603.8xmedian 29.8x 21.6xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 3.0x 4.7xmedian 3.0x 18.3xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 3.95median 1.17 0.81median 1.17 1.65median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPLXSTTMIJBL
Revenue $4.60B $3.38B $35.95B
Gross profit $461.48M $715.64M $3.32B
Operating income $230.67M $334.16M $1.70B
Net income $185.41M $236.78M $1.04B
Free cash flow $61.87M -$15.14M $1.37B
R&D – $29.71M $30.00M
EPS (diluted) $6.79 $2.20 $9.75
Cash & equivalents $314.05M $507.91M $1.74B
Total debt $275.46M $3.72B $3.38B
Shares (diluted) 27.29M 107.58M 106.90M
Enterprise value $4.97B $7.23B $23.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPLXSTTMIJBL
P/E 33.2x 38.2x 28.8x
P/FCF 99.3x -603.8x 21.6x
P/Operating cash flow 35.9x 28.3x 14.8x
P/S 1.3x 2.7x 0.8x
P/B 4.0x 4.7x 18.3x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 5.1x 29.2x
EV/EBITDA 19.9x 19.6x 13.1x
EV/EBIT 26.5x 28.8x 18.3x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 2.8x 0.9x
EV/FCF 98.7x -634.6x 22.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 35.7x 29.8x 15.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.95 0.81 1.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPLXSTTMIJBL
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.2% 27.6% 20.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.2% 12.3% 1.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.7% 33.6% 25.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 18.5% 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.6% 94.3% 44.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 47.1% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 14.0% 154.1% 58.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.5% 48.5% 8.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.0% 147.7% 64.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 47.2% 17.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -49.3% 35.5% 22.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.3% – 4.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.3% -185.8% 17.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 70.7% – 25.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPLXSTTMIJBL
Gross margin 10.0% 21.2% 9.2%
EBITDA margin 6.7% 14.5% 6.6%
Operating margin 5.0% 9.9% 4.7%
Pretax margin 4.7% 7.8% 3.9%
Net margin 4.0% 7.0% 2.9%
FCF margin 1.3% -0.4% 3.8%
Operating cash flow margin 3.7% 9.6% 5.6%
Return on equity 12.3% 12.6% 70.7%
Return on assets 5.3% 5.6% 4.1%
Return on invested capital 11.3% 10.6% 25.9%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 11.4% 43.1%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.8x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.4x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 1.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPLXSTTMIJBL
Debt / assets 7.6% 22.0% 12.3%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.5x 2.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 1.0x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 4.5x -64.3x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 57.9% 56.2% 94.1%
Equity / assets 42.1% 43.8% 5.9%
Interest coverage 18.0x 7.6x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.8x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.4x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.36 3.86 2.57

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPLXSTTMIJBL
Dividend yield – – 0.1%
Net buyback yield 1.4% – 3.5%
Shareholder yield 1.4% – 3.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPLXSTTMIJBL
Forward P/E 27.6xFY2026 16.4xFY2026 16.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $8.35FY2026 $5.29FY2026 $17.25FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +12.4%FY2026 +115.0%FY2026 +31.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +26.7% +53.3% +36.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.60BFY2026 $4.26BFY2026 $46.50BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +14.1%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026 +29.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +16.8% +60.2% +17.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPLXSTTMIJBL
Held by institutions 99.7% 92.4% 96.9%
Institutions holding 447 638 1,120
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% +0.6% +3.2%
Institutions buying 245 396 618
Institutions selling 135 202 373
Buyers to sellers 1.81 1.96 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PLXSTTMIJBL
PLXS 1.00 0.67 0.71
TTMI 0.67 1.00 0.68
JBL 0.71 0.68 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PLXS, TTMI and JBL?

Jabil (JBL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Plexus (PLXS) $6.14B, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.14B, Jabil (JBL) $29.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, PLXS, TTMI and JBL?

Jabil (JBL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Plexus (PLXS) 33.2x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 38.2x, Jabil (JBL) 28.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Plexus (PLXS) 27.6x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 16.4x, Jabil (JBL) 16.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Plexus (PLXS) +14.2%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%, Jabil (JBL) +20.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Plexus (PLXS) 4.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Jabil (JBL) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Jabil (JBL) leads (Plexus (PLXS) 11.3%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%, Jabil (JBL) 25.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Plexus (PLXS) returned the most: Plexus (PLXS) +60.7%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.3%, Jabil (JBL) +34.2%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Plexus (PLXS) +21.4%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +46.2%/yr, Jabil (JBL) +36.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Jabil (JBL) 0.11%. Plexus (PLXS) and Ttm Technologies (TTMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Plexus (PLXS) has been the steadiest (Plexus (PLXS) 41.4%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.4%, Jabil (JBL) 47.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PLXS, TTMI and JBL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.