PLAY vs PUSA vs MTN Stock Comparison

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Powerus and Vail Resorts Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PUSA Powerus Corp
$1.91 -48.7% 1M -75.6% 1Y
Market cap
$95.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.21M
Div. yield
–
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
1 win
MTN Vail Resorts Inc
$151.39 +11.2% 1M -4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.39B
P/E
36.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.84B
Div. yield
5.87%
Entertainment Venues Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Vail Resorts leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Vail Resorts 8, Powerus 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPLAYPUSAMTNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $264.16M $95.22M $5.39B MTN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.0x -19.2x 36.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 27.9x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.5% +6.1% -4.3% PUSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.3% -154.2% 5.2% MTN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.7% — 8.2% MTN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.5x — 4.0x MTN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 5.87% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.2% -75.6% -4.1% MTN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.3%/yr — -15.0%/yr MTN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 76.7% 114.5% 38.0% MTN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 24/100 47/100 MTN

Percentile Scorecard

PLAYPUSAMTN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPLAYPUSAMTN
Valuation 67 #15 of 44 12 #39 of 44 37 #28 of 44
Growth 7 #40 of 43 0 #43 of 43 24 #33 of 43
Profitability 43 #24 of 41 8 #38 of 41 78 #10 of 41
Financial Health 11 #42 of 47 100 #1 of 47 30 #33 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 0 #29 of 29 68 #10 of 29
Overall 32 24 47
  • PLAY ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • PUSA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MTN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPLAYPUSAMTNSPY
1 month +14.5%-48.7%+11.2% -0.2%
3 months -27.0%-33.2%-3.7% +3.9%
6 months -33.9%-51.4%+19.5% +8.2%
Year to date -53.2%-39.4%+14.0% +12.9%
1 year -57.2%-75.6%-4.1% +12.3%
3 years -78.1%—-26.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -39.8%—-9.8% +23.3%
5 years -79.6%—-55.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -27.3%—-15.0% +10.9%
10 years -81.2%—-2.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year -15.4%—-0.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePLAYPUSAMTNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 76.7%114.5%38.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 80.5%116.3%36.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.581.260.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.75-0.66-0.11 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.7%-89.9%-68.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.2%-75.6%-6.4% -1.2%
52-week high $21.17$7.82$161.76 $779.14
52-week low $6.38$1.87$119.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePLAYPUSAMTN
P/E now vs peer median -3.0xmedian 17.0x -19.2xmedian 17.0x 36.7xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 1.9x 29.6xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 10.8x -8.3xmedian 10.8x 11.4xmedian 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.5xmedian 11.2x -40.1xmedian 11.2x 21.8xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.4x 2.0xmedian 2.4x 9.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.07median 0.56 —median 0.56 -2.46median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPLAYPUSAMTN
Revenue $2.08B $3.21M $2.84B
Gross profit $1.78B – –
Operating income $36.20M -$6.56M $420.54M
Net income -$88.60M -$4.95M $170.74M
Free cash flow -$16.00M -$2.38M $248.00M
EPS (diluted) $-2.55 $-0.10 $4.12
Cash & equivalents $16.00M $22.20M $231.35M
Total debt $1.51B – $3.19B
Shares (diluted) 34.81M 49.86M 35.79M
Enterprise value $198.36M -$43.17M $4.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPLAYPUSAMTN
P/E -3.0x -19.2x 36.7x
P/FCF -16.5x -40.1x 21.8x
P/Operating cash flow 0.8x -59.5x 11.2x
P/S 0.1x 29.6x 1.9x
P/B 3.0x 2.0x 9.7x
P/Tangible book -2.9x 2.0x 20.5x
EV/EBITDA 5.3x -8.3x 11.4x
EV/EBIT 48.5x -8.0x 19.8x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 16.3x 2.9x
EV/FCF -109.7x -22.1x 33.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.5x -32.8x 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.07 – -2.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPLAYPUSAMTN
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.5% 6.1% -4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.6% – -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -78.3% -922.9% -24.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -50.9% – -5.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,013% -960.6% -42.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -38.3% – -15.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,022% -195.3% -45.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.0% – -14.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 38.9% -149.0% -13.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.6% – -9.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 94.9% -139.7% -22.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.4% – -8.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPLAYPUSAMTN
Gross margin 85.4% – –
EBITDA margin 15.9% -196.5% 25.6%
Operating margin 1.7% -204.1% 14.8%
Pretax margin -5.6% -159.4% 8.0%
Net margin -4.3% -154.2% 5.2%
FCF margin -0.8% -74.0% 8.7%
Operating cash flow margin 15.5% -49.8% 16.9%
Return on equity -94.5% -11.2% 23.2%
Return on assets -2.1% -10.9% 3.0%
Return on invested capital 1.7% – 8.2%
Return on capital employed 1.0% -14.6% 9.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.6x 0.3x 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 106.7% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPLAYPUSAMTN
Debt / assets 36.6% – 57.7%
Debt / equity 17.2x – 5.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.5x – 4.0x
Debt / FCF -94.2x – 12.8x
Liabilities / assets 97.9% 3.0% 89.9%
Equity / assets 2.1% 97.0% 10.1%
Interest coverage 0.2x – 2.0x
Current ratio 0.3x 52.4x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.1x 52.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 52.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 0.69 39.86 1.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPLAYPUSAMTN
Dividend yield – – 5.9%
Net buyback yield – -39.1% 0.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -39.1% 6.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPLAYPUSAMTN
Forward P/E – – 27.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.62FY2026 – $5.43FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – – +31.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – – +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.03BFY2026 – $2.95BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY -3.4%FY2026 – +4.0%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% – +9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPLAYPUSAMTN
Held by institutions 100.0% 4.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 171 32 439
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% +209.7% +3.8%
Institutions buying 92 27 226
Institutions selling 56 1 145
Buyers to sellers 1.64 27.00 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PLAYPUSAMTN
PLAY 1.00 -0.01 0.31
PUSA -0.01 1.00 -0.01
MTN 0.31 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PLAY, PUSA and MTN?

Vail Resorts (MTN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) $264.16M, Powerus (PUSA) $95.22M, Vail Resorts (MTN) $5.39B.

Which company is growing faster?

Powerus (PUSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -1.5%, Powerus (PUSA) +6.1%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Vail Resorts (MTN) has the highest net margin (Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -4.3%, Powerus (PUSA) -154.2%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads (Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 1.7%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 8.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Vail Resorts (MTN) returned the most: Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -57.2%, Powerus (PUSA) -75.6%, Vail Resorts (MTN) -4.1%. Over five years, Vail Resorts (MTN) compounded fastest (Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) -27.3%/yr, Vail Resorts (MTN) -15.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 0.00%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 5.87%. Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) and Powerus (PUSA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Vail Resorts (MTN) has been the steadiest (Dave & Buster's Entertainment (PLAY) 76.7%, Powerus (PUSA) 114.5%, Vail Resorts (MTN) 38.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PLAY, PUSA and MTN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Vail Resorts (MTN) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.