PKX vs SQM vs SIM Stock Comparison

Posco Holdings, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile and GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PKX Posco Holdings Inc.
$50.63 -11.0% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.93B
P/E
4.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.16B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 8, Posco Holdings 1, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPKXSQMSIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.93B $17.23B $3.97B SQM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.2x 12.4x 50.9x PKX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.3x 8.0x 18.1x SQM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -27.8% +59.0% — SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.5% 20.6% — SQM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.0% 22.8% — SQM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.6% +25.0% -6.9% SQM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.8%/yr +1.2%/yr -0.5%/yr SQM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.0% 47.0% 44.0% SIM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 70/100 — SQM

Percentile Scorecard

PKXSQMSIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPKXSQMSIM
Valuation 87 #22 of 162 81 #31 of 162 71 #48 of 162
Growth 39 #90 of 147 62 #56 of 147 –
Profitability 50 #61 of 122 81 #24 of 122 –
Financial Health 79 #36 of 165 32 #112 of 165 80 #34 of 165
Shareholder Returns 86 #16 of 107 92 #10 of 107 –
Overall 68 70 –
  • PKX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SIM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPKXSQMSIMSPY
1 month -11.0%-14.8%-10.4% -0.8%
3 months -4.7%-17.2%-2.8% +3.5%
6 months -28.7%-37.6%-15.8% +7.0%
Year to date -4.8%-17.2%-12.8% +12.2%
1 year -9.6%+25.0%-6.9% +13.0%
3 years -35.1%+11.5%-15.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -13.4%+3.7%-5.6% +23.1%
5 years -21.7%+5.9%-2.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -4.8%+1.2%-0.5% +11.0%
10 years -5.7%+94.6%+145.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year -0.6%+6.9%+9.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePKXSQMSIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.0%47.0%44.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.1%43.9%85.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.410.960.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.210.53-0.16 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.8%-73.5%-40.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.8%-40.2%-24.7% -1.8%
52-week high $91.72$95.31$34.35 $779.14
52-week low $48.69$44.36$25.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePKXSQMSIM
P/E now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 12.8x 11.7xmedian 12.8x 50.9xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 3.1x 2.4xmedian 3.1x 2.7xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x 4.8xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.9xmedian 15.2x —median 15.2x -34.7xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.1x 1.9xmedian 2.1x 1.3xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -15.71median 0.29 -0.75median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPKXSQMSIM
Revenue $37.16B $6.73B –
Gross profit $3.86B $2.83B –
Operating income $1.39B $3.11B –
Net income $1.47B $1.39B –
Free cash flow -$4.45B – –
EPS (diluted) $12.52 $4.86 –
Cash & equivalents – $3.38B $1.59B
Total debt $749.60M $19.72B $67.31M
Shares (diluted) 75.62M 285.64M –
Enterprise value $3.93B $3.89B -$5.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPKXSQMSIM
P/E 4.0x 11.7x 50.9x
P/FCF -0.9x – -34.7x
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S 0.1x 2.4x 2.7x
P/B 0.1x 1.9x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 0.1x 1.9x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 4.8x –
EV/EBIT 3.3x 5.5x –
EV/Revenue 0.1x 2.5x –
EV/FCF -1.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -15.71 -0.75 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPKXSQMSIM
Revenue growth (1Y) -27.8% 59.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -15.1% -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.1% 150.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.3% -9.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.9% 134.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -38.2% -17.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 297.8% 190.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.9% -7.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 163.2% 190.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -0.3% -15.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 27.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -34.8% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPKXSQMSIM
Gross margin 10.4% 42.1% –
EBITDA margin – 52.7% –
Operating margin 3.7% 46.2% –
Pretax margin 3.5% 36.6% –
Net margin 2.5% 20.6% –
FCF margin -12.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity 3.4% 16.4% –
Return on assets 3.1% 8.6% –
Return on invested capital 3.0% 22.8% –
Return on capital employed 4.1% 23.4% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPKXSQMSIM
Debt / assets 2.2% 31.3% 1.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x –
Debt / FCF -0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 7.7% 47.9% 16.9%
Equity / assets 92.3% 52.1% 83.1%
Interest coverage 0.5x 15.3x –
Current ratio – 2.6x 5.3x
Quick ratio – 1.8x 4.0x
Cash ratio – 1.5x 3.4x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPKXSQMSIM
Dividend yield 3.0% 4.2% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 4.2% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPKXSQMSIM
Forward P/E 10.3xFY2026 8.0xFY2026 18.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.90FY2026 $7.12FY2026 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +245.1%FY2026 +245.6%FY2026 +181.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.7% -2.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $52.03BFY2026 $8.37BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +7.4%FY2026 +82.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +3.5% +2.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPKXSQMSIM
Held by institutions 17.7% 13.4% 0.1%
Institutions holding 181 316 12
Change in shares held, QoQ +38.2% -3.0% -0.3%
Institutions buying 131 166 1
Institutions selling 30 100 3
Buyers to sellers 4.37 1.66 0.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PKXSQMSIM
PKX 1.00 0.28 0.05
SQM 0.28 1.00 0.03
SIM 0.05 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PKX, SQM and SIM?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Posco Holdings (PKX) $3.93B, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $17.23B, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) $3.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, PKX, SQM and SIM?

Posco Holdings (PKX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Posco Holdings (PKX) 4.2x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 12.4x, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 50.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is cheapest (Posco Holdings (PKX) 10.3x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 8.0x, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 18.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Posco Holdings (PKX) -27.8%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest net margin (Posco Holdings (PKX) 2.5%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads (Posco Holdings (PKX) 3.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 22.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) returned the most: Posco Holdings (PKX) -9.6%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +25.0%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) -6.9%. Over five years, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) compounded fastest (Posco Holdings (PKX) -4.8%/yr, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +1.2%/yr, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) -0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) has been the steadiest (Posco Holdings (PKX) 45.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.0%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 44.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PKX, SQM and SIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.