PKOH vs TS vs LXFR Stock Comparison

Park Ohio Holdings, Tenaris and Luxfer Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PKOH Park Ohio Holdings Corp
$45.00 -4.6% 1M +120.0% 1Y
Market cap
$607.71M
P/E
22.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.65B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins
TS Tenaris Sa
$61.31 +11.4% 1M +61.0% 1Y
Market cap
$63.97B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.04B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
7 wins
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.26 -0.1% 1M +33.8% 1Y
Market cap
$462.00M
P/E
74.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$355.20M
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tenaris leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tenaris 7, Park Ohio Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPKOHTSLXFRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $607.71M $63.97B $462.00M TS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.9x 33.4x 74.5x PKOH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.2x 15.4x 17.4x PKOH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.7% +2.3% -11.8% PKOH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 15.9% 1.7% TS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.1% 12.7% 5.2% TS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.8x -3.1x 1.2x TS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +120.0% +61.0% +33.8% PKOH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.1%/yr +22.5%/yr -3.0%/yr TS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.4% 28.9% 33.1% TS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 58/100 53/100 TS

Percentile Scorecard

PKOHTSLXFR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPKOHTSLXFR
Valuation 85 #32 of 203 42 #119 of 203 57 #87 of 203
Growth 74 #50 of 188 18 #155 of 188 20 #151 of 188
Profitability 41 #109 of 183 81 #35 of 183 40 #111 of 183
Financial Health 14 #187 of 216 99 #4 of 216 66 #74 of 216
Shareholder Returns 44 #86 of 152 52 #74 of 152 83 #27 of 152
Overall 51 58 53
  • PKOH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • LXFR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPKOHTSLXFRSPY
1 month -4.6%+11.4%-0.1% +0.7%
3 months +14.1%+8.1%+1.4% +3.7%
6 months +55.4%-4.1%+14.7% +7.1%
Year to date +114.9%+59.5%+27.6% +12.8%
1 year +120.0%+61.0%+33.8% +11.9%
3 years +96.2%+93.7%+103.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +25.2%+24.7%+26.7% +22.8%
5 years +93.0%+175.2%-14.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +14.1%+22.5%-3.0% +10.9%
10 years +40.9%+115.3%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +3.5%+8.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePKOHTSLXFRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.4%28.9%33.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.5%29.4%39.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.310.320.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.702.111.02 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.4%-33.7%-67.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-4.2%-9.5% -1.2%
52-week high $52.51$64.02$19.08 $779.14
52-week low $18.74$37.76$11.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePKOHTSLXFR
P/E now vs peer median 23.6xmedian 25.8x 33.9xmedian 25.8x 74.5xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.9x 5.5xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 14.6x 20.0xmedian 14.6x 15.5xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.8xmedian 22.2x 23.6xmedian 22.2x 24.4xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.2x 3.8xmedian 2.2x 2.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.38median 1.45 —median 1.45 56.45median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPKOHTSLXFR
Revenue $1.65B $12.04B $355.20M
Gross profit $286.50M $4.08B $89.00M
Operating income $71.50M $2.23B $22.40M
Net income $26.50M $1.97B $6.20M
Free cash flow $20.50M $2.78B $18.90M
R&D – – $5.60M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 – $0.23
Cash & equivalents $48.30M $9.02B $19.90M
Total debt $652.60M $1.27B $57.70M
Shares (diluted) 14.20M – 27.30M
Enterprise value $417.11M $35.01B $407.50M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPKOHTSLXFR
P/E 23.6x 33.9x 74.5x
P/FCF 31.8x 23.6x 24.4x
P/Operating cash flow 9.7x 29.3x 15.4x
P/S 0.4x 5.5x 1.3x
P/B 1.7x 3.8x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 3.8x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 12.0x 20.0x 15.5x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 25.6x 22.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 4.7x 1.4x
EV/FCF 61.3x 20.5x 26.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.6x 25.4x 16.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.38 – 56.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPKOHTSLXFR
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.7% 2.3% -11.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.8% -6.7% -5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.9% 2.7% -3.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% -13.9% 2.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.1% -20.6% -4.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -4.7% -3.3% -56.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 66.6% -18.8% 1.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.0% – -56.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 62.5% – 1.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 476.1% -11.7% -31.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 93.5% -9.6% 0.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 187.6% -13.2% -47.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.1% -7.8% 0.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPKOHTSLXFR
Gross margin 17.3% 33.9% 25.1%
EBITDA margin 6.3% 23.7% 9.1%
Operating margin 4.3% 18.5% 6.3%
Pretax margin 1.6% 20.5% 5.2%
Net margin 1.6% 15.9% 1.7%
FCF margin 1.2% 23.1% 5.3%
Operating cash flow margin 4.1% 18.6% 8.4%
Return on equity 6.9% 11.4% 2.8%
Return on assets 1.8% 9.7% 1.6%
Return on invested capital 6.1% 12.7% 5.2%
Return on capital employed 6.6% 11.0% 7.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.6x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 1.1x 4.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPKOHTSLXFR
Debt / assets 44.4% 1.5% 15.1%
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.0x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.8x -3.1x 1.2x
Debt / FCF 31.8x 0.1x 3.1x
Liabilities / assets 73.3% 15.2% 42.1%
Equity / assets 26.7% 84.8% 57.9%
Interest coverage 1.4x 45.4x 6.6x
Current ratio 2.4x – 2.5x
Quick ratio 1.1x 70.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 58.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – 3.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPKOHTSLXFR
Dividend yield 1.1% 2.9% 2.3%
Net buyback yield – -1.5% 0.6%
Shareholder yield 1.1% 1.4% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPKOHTSLXFR
Forward P/E 13.2xFY2026 15.4xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.41FY2026 $3.97FY2026 $0.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.3%FY2026 +8.5%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +1.5% +41.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.78BFY2026 $12.99BFY2026 $386.72MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.8% -6.1% +2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPKOHTSLXFR
Held by institutions 55.8% 3.6% 91.6%
Institutions holding 104 284 137
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% -2.4% -1.6%
Institutions buying 58 154 76
Institutions selling 27 79 41
Buyers to sellers 2.15 1.95 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PKOHTSLXFR
PKOH 1.00 0.00 0.37
TS 0.00 1.00 0.16
LXFR 0.37 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PKOH, TS and LXFR?

Tenaris (TS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) $607.71M, Tenaris (TS) $63.97B, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $462.00M.

Which stock is cheaper, PKOH, TS and LXFR?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 22.9x, Tenaris (TS) 33.4x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 74.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) is cheapest (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 13.2x, Tenaris (TS) 15.4x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +2.7%, Tenaris (TS) +2.3%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -11.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tenaris (TS) has the highest net margin (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 1.6%, Tenaris (TS) 15.9%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 1.7%). On return on invested capital, Tenaris (TS) leads (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 6.1%, Tenaris (TS) 12.7%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 5.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) returned the most: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +120.0%, Tenaris (TS) +61.0%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +33.8%. Over five years, Tenaris (TS) compounded fastest (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +14.1%/yr, Tenaris (TS) +22.5%/yr, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tenaris (TS) has been the steadiest (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 44.4%, Tenaris (TS) 28.9%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 33.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PKOH, TS and LXFR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tenaris (TS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.