PKOH vs LXFR Stock Comparison

Park Ohio Holdings and Luxfer Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PKOH Park Ohio Holdings Corp
$43.35 -9.8% 1M +111.4% 1Y
Market cap
$628.14M
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.65B
Div. yield
1.18%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
8 wins
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.26 0.0% 1M +27.1% 1Y
Market cap
$461.86M
P/E
57.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$363.20M
Div. yield
2.26%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Park Ohio Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Park Ohio Holdings 8, Luxfer Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPKOHLXFRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $628.14M $461.86M PKOH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.7x 57.7x PKOH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.7x 17.4x PKOH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.7% -10.6% PKOH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 2.2% LXFR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.1% 4.6% PKOH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.8x 1.4x LXFR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.18% 2.26% LXFR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +111.4% +27.1% PKOH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.9%/yr -3.4%/yr PKOH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.5% 33.3% LXFR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 55/100 PKOH

Percentile Scorecard

PKOHLXFR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPKOHLXFR
Valuation 86 #10 of 67 68 #22 of 67
Growth 87 #8 of 54 21 #43 of 54
Profitability 60 #22 of 53 58 #23 of 53
Financial Health 19 #67 of 82 58 #35 of 82
Shareholder Returns 42 #23 of 39 68 #13 of 39
Overall 59 55
  • PKOH ranked among 82 companies in Machinery
  • LXFR ranked among 82 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPKOHLXFRSPY
1 month -9.8%0.0% -0.8%
3 months +10.9%+0.8% +3.5%
6 months +61.5%+31.0% +7.0%
Year to date +107.0%+27.6% +12.2%
1 year +111.4%+27.1% +13.0%
3 years +96.6%+101.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +25.3%+26.4% +23.1%
5 years +83.0%-15.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +12.9%-3.4% +11.0%
10 years +32.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePKOHLXFRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.5%33.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.4%39.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.300.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.500.81 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.4%-67.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.4%-9.5% -1.8%
52-week high $52.51$19.08 $779.14
52-week low $18.74$11.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePKOHLXFR
P/E now vs peer median 22.7xmedian 22.6x 57.7xmedian 22.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 13.4x 15.5xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 30.6xmedian 20.5x 27.5xmedian 20.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.4x 2.1xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.36median 0.76 -2.97median 0.76

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPKOHLXFR
Revenue $1.65B $363.20M
Gross profit $286.50M $90.20M
Operating income $71.50M $22.70M
Net income $26.50M $8.00M
Free cash flow $20.50M $16.80M
R&D – $5.10M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $0.29
Cash & equivalents $48.30M $11.50M
Total debt $652.60M –
Shares (diluted) 14.20M 27.22M
Enterprise value $438.94M $421.26M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPKOHLXFR
P/E 22.7x 57.7x
P/FCF 30.6x 27.5x
P/Operating cash flow 9.3x 17.8x
P/S 0.4x 1.3x
P/B 1.6x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 11.8x 15.5x
EV/EBIT 17.2x 22.4x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 1.4x
EV/FCF 60.1x 30.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.3x 19.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.36 -2.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPKOHLXFR
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.7% -10.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.8% -5.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.9% -1.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% -0.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.1% -33.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.1% -14.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -4.7% -67.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 66.6% -19.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.0% -67.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 62.5% -19.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 476.1% -42.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 93.5% 6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 187.6% -52.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.1% 14.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPKOHLXFR
Gross margin 17.3% 24.8%
EBITDA margin 6.3% 9.0%
Operating margin 4.3% 6.3%
Pretax margin 1.6% 5.4%
Net margin 1.6% 2.2%
FCF margin 1.2% 4.6%
Operating cash flow margin 4.1% 7.2%
Return on equity 6.9% 3.6%
Return on assets 1.8% 2.0%
Return on invested capital 6.1% 4.6%
Return on capital employed 6.6% 7.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 3.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPKOHLXFR
Debt / assets 44.4% 15.0%
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.8x 1.4x
Debt / FCF 31.8x 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 73.3% 42.8%
Equity / assets 26.7% 57.2%
Interest coverage 1.4x 7.3x
Current ratio 2.4x 2.3x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 3.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPKOHLXFR
Dividend yield 1.2% 2.3%
Net buyback yield – 0.7%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPKOHLXFR
Forward P/E 12.7xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.41FY2026 $0.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.3%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.2% +41.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.78BFY2026 $386.72MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.5%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.8% +2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPKOHLXFR
Held by institutions 55.8% 91.6%
Institutions holding 104 136
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% -1.6%
Institutions buying 58 76
Institutions selling 27 41
Buyers to sellers 2.15 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PKOHLXFR
PKOH 1.00 0.36
LXFR 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PKOH and LXFR?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) $628.14M, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $461.86M.

Which stock is cheaper, PKOH and LXFR?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 22.7x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 57.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) is cheapest (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 12.7x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +2.7%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -10.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has the highest net margin (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 1.6%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 2.2%). On return on invested capital, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) leads (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 6.1%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) returned the most: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +111.4%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +27.1%. Over five years, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) compounded fastest (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) +12.9%/yr, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has the highest dividend yield: Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 1.18%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 2.26%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has been the steadiest (Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) 44.5%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 33.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do PKOH and LXFR move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.36, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, PKOH and LXFR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Park Ohio Holdings (PKOH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.