PH vs GLW vs MMM Stock Comparison

Parker-Hannifin, Corning and 3M Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PH Parker-Hannifin Corp
$904.18 -7.6% 1M +17.1% 1Y
Market cap
$113.96B
P/E
31.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.50B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$127.80 -18.4% 1M +46.2% 1Y
Market cap
$108.84B
P/E
57.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.96B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
4 wins
MMM 3M Co
$172.79 +1.9% 1M +2.5% 1Y
Market cap
$89.26B
P/E
25.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

3M leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (3M 5, Corning 4, Parker-Hannifin 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPHGLWMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $113.96B $108.84B $89.26B PH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.2x 57.3x 25.2x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.8x 37.0x 19.5x MMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +19.4% +1.7% GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.0% 11.2% 14.0% PH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.4% 10.4% 22.0% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.5x 1.6x PH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.02% MMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.1% +46.2% +2.5% GLW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.9%/yr +29.3%/yr +3.0%/yr GLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.2% 74.7% 25.6% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 57/100 49/100 GLW

Percentile Scorecard

PHGLWMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPHGLWMMM
Valuation 25 #152 of 203 18 #77 of 94 37 #129 of 203
Growth 69 #59 of 187 99 #2 of 92 59 #77 of 187
Profitability 94 #12 of 185 81 #18 of 89 86 #26 of 185
Financial Health 44 #123 of 219 59 #40 of 97 18 #179 of 219
Shareholder Returns 51 #76 of 153 28 #51 of 70 43 #87 of 153
Overall 57 57 49
  • PH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPHGLWMMMSPY
1 month -7.6%-18.4%+1.9% -0.8%
3 months -8.4%-10.8%-3.0% +3.5%
6 months -7.2%-23.9%+18.5% +7.0%
Year to date +2.9%+46.0%+7.9% +12.2%
1 year +17.1%+46.2%+2.5% +13.0%
3 years +146.9%+380.6%+136.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +35.2%+68.8%+33.2% +23.1%
5 years +203.4%+261.1%+15.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +24.9%+29.3%+3.0% +11.0%
10 years +642.1%+455.2%+24.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +22.2%+18.7%+2.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePHGLWMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.2%74.7%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.9%75.7%24.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.843.030.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.630.620.10 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.2%-51.6%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.8%-50.0%-6.0% -1.8%
52-week high $1,073.86$255.69$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $767.01$78.03$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePHGLWMMM
P/E now vs peer median 31.3xmedian 26.0x 58.0xmedian 21.6x 25.4xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 1.9x 6.5xmedian 1.4x 3.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 14.0x 28.8xmedian 12.4x 16.1xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 21.4x 46.0xmedian 15.8x 33.4xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 2.2x 8.4xmedian 1.6x 21.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.49median 1.26 1.33median 1.66 0.71median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPHGLWMMM
Revenue $21.50B $16.96B $25.25B
Gross profit $8.10B $6.17B $9.98B
Operating income $4.63B $2.60B $4.74B
Net income $3.65B $2.07B $3.58B
Free cash flow $3.91B $2.40B $2.68B
R&D – $1.14B $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $28.48 $2.17 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $501.00M $2.50B $4.84B
Total debt $8.52B $8.47B $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 128.10M 875.00M 522.60M
Enterprise value $112.08B $101.41B $70.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPHGLWMMM
P/E 31.3x 58.0x 25.4x
P/FCF 29.2x 46.0x 33.4x
P/Operating cash flow 26.1x 28.1x 24.6x
P/S 5.3x 6.5x 3.5x
P/B 7.4x 8.4x 21.4x
P/Tangible book 14.0x 8.8x 42.2x
EV/EBITDA 21.9x 28.8x 16.1x
EV/EBIT 26.3x 44.7x 20.9x
EV/Revenue 5.7x 6.8x 3.9x
EV/FCF 31.2x 48.5x 37.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.0x 29.6x 27.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.49 1.33 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPHGLWMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 19.4% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 8.4% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.8% 24.9% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 15.6% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.1% 51.7% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 39.6% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 3.3% 128.4% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 44.1% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.0% 129.3% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.1% 43.7% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.6% 79.5% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 27.4% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.9% 100.6% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.5% 111.0% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPHGLWMMM
Gross margin 37.7% 36.4% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 25.9% 23.8% 24.4%
Operating margin 21.6% 15.3% 18.8%
Pretax margin 21.2% 14.2% 17.5%
Net margin 17.0% 11.2% 14.0%
FCF margin 18.2% 14.1% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 20.3% 23.1% 14.4%
Return on equity 24.3% 16.3% 101.3%
Return on assets 11.9% 6.5% 9.8%
Return on invested capital 15.4% 10.4% 22.0%
Return on capital employed 18.8% 10.0% 18.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.9x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 2.5% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPHGLWMMM
Debt / assets 27.6% 25.7% 37.9%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.6x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.5x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 2.2x 3.5x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 50.1% 60.2% 89.5%
Equity / assets 49.9% 39.8% 10.5%
Interest coverage 11.6x 7.3x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.8x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 6.79 5.00 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPHGLWMMM
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.9% 1.8%
Net buyback yield 1.1% -0.5% 3.1%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 0.4% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 47.8% 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 41.4% 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.3% 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.9% -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPHGLWMMM
Forward P/E 23.8xFY2027 37.0xFY2026 19.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $37.94FY2027 $3.45FY2026 $8.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.4%FY2027 +36.9%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.8% +24.1% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.49BFY2027 $18.34BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.2%FY2027 +11.8%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.0% +31.0% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPHGLWMMM
Held by institutions 91.8% 73.0% 74.5%
Institutions holding 1,975 2,680 2,208
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% +3.5% +0.8%
Institutions buying 927 1,474 914
Institutions selling 693 949 837
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.55 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PHGLWMMM
PH 1.00 0.38 0.32
GLW 0.38 1.00 0.17
MMM 0.32 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PH, GLW and MMM?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Parker-Hannifin (PH) $113.96B, Corning (GLW) $108.84B, 3M (MMM) $89.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, PH, GLW and MMM?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Parker-Hannifin (PH) 31.2x, Corning (GLW) 57.3x, 3M (MMM) 25.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, 3M (MMM) is cheapest (Parker-Hannifin (PH) 23.8x, Corning (GLW) 37.0x, 3M (MMM) 19.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Parker-Hannifin (PH) +8.3%, Corning (GLW) +19.4%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) has the highest net margin (Parker-Hannifin (PH) 17.0%, Corning (GLW) 11.2%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Parker-Hannifin (PH) 15.4%, Corning (GLW) 10.4%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Corning (GLW) returned the most: Parker-Hannifin (PH) +17.1%, Corning (GLW) +46.2%, 3M (MMM) +2.5%. Over five years, Corning (GLW) compounded fastest (Parker-Hannifin (PH) +24.9%/yr, Corning (GLW) +29.3%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

3M (MMM) has the highest dividend yield: Parker-Hannifin (PH) 0.00%, Corning (GLW) 0.01%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%. Parker-Hannifin (PH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Parker-Hannifin (PH) 27.2%, Corning (GLW) 74.7%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PH, GLW and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.