PFSI vs WD Stock Comparison

PennyMac Financial Services and Walker & Dunlop Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
$34.20 -10.0% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.15B
P/E
29.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
0.08%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

PennyMac Financial Services leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (PennyMac Financial Services 8, Walker & Dunlop 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPFSIWDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.35B $1.15B PFSI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.5x 29.8x PFSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.7x 8.1x WD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +25.9% +8.0% PFSI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.7% 3.0% PFSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 3.8% PFSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.8x WD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.08% WD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -52.4% -60.1% PFSI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.2%/yr -23.3%/yr PFSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.4% 46.5% WD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 48/100 PFSI

Percentile Scorecard

PFSIWD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPFSIWD
Valuation 41 #100 of 170 50 #86 of 170
Growth 54 #75 of 160 35 #104 of 160
Profitability 49 #77 of 149 39 #92 of 149
Financial Health 47 #85 of 158 71 #46 of 158
Shareholder Returns 61 #53 of 135 44 #76 of 135
Overall 50 48
  • PFSI ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • WD ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPFSIWDSPY
1 month -3.7%-10.0% -0.8%
3 months -25.4%-30.6% +3.5%
6 months -30.6%-32.8% +7.0%
Year to date -52.1%-43.1% +12.2%
1 year -52.4%-60.1% +13.0%
3 years -9.3%-47.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.2%-19.2% +23.1%
5 years +0.8%-73.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +0.2%-23.3% +11.0%
10 years +271.6%+42.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +14.0%+3.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePFSIWDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.4%46.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.5%53.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.811.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.00-1.29 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.8%-79.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.4%-59.9% -1.8%
52-week high $159.46$85.36 $779.14
52-week low $57.77$31.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePFSIWD
P/E now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 11.0x 29.6xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.6x 0.9xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 13.1x 4.8xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 6.9x -8.7xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.61median 0.32 -0.83median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPFSIWD
Revenue $2.21B $1.29B
Net income $392.38M $41.08M
Free cash flow -$1.80B -$131.24M
EPS (diluted) $7.37 $1.15
Cash & equivalents $214.27M $160.86M
Total debt $4.84B $820.95M
Shares (diluted) 53.25M 33.28M
Enterprise value $404.93M $219.05M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPFSIWD
P/E 8.4x 29.6x
P/FCF -1.8x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow -1.8x -9.5x
P/S 1.5x 0.9x
P/B 0.8x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 4.5x 4.8x
EV/EBIT 4.8x 13.8x
EV/Revenue 3.3x 1.4x
EV/FCF -4.1x -13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -4.1x -15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.61 -0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPFSIWD
Revenue growth (1Y) 25.9% 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.0% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – –
Net income growth (1Y) 1.5% -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.5% -33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 2.2% -65.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.8% -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -11.1% 37.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.3% 7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -11.9% 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -16.5% 8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPFSIWD
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin 73.6% 29.3%
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin 22.9% 4.3%
Net margin 17.7% 3.0%
FCF margin -81.4% -10.2%
Operating cash flow margin -80.7% -9.3%
Return on equity 9.1% 2.4%
Return on assets 1.3% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 3.8%
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.6x -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPFSIWD
Debt / assets 16.2% 16.8%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.8x
Debt / FCF -2.7x -6.3x
Liabilities / assets 85.5% 64.9%
Equity / assets 14.5% 35.1%
Interest coverage 1.5x 1.7x
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPFSIWD
Dividend yield 1.9% 7.9%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 3.1% 9.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 16.1% 226.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) -3.5% -70.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.7% 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPFSIWD
Forward P/E 13.7xFY2026 8.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.61FY2026 $4.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -50.4%FY2026 +157.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +125.2% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.30BFY2026 $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPFSIWD
Held by institutions 64.8% 89.0%
Institutions holding 229 265
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.5% +3.5%
Institutions buying 132 160
Institutions selling 66 59
Buyers to sellers 2.00 2.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PFSIWD
PFSI 1.00 0.29
WD 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PFSI and WD?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) is the largest by market capitalisation: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) $3.35B, Walker & Dunlop (WD) $1.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, PFSI and WD?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 8.5x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 29.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Walker & Dunlop (WD) is cheapest (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.7x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +25.9%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) has the highest net margin (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 17.7%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.0%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) returned the most: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) -52.4%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -60.1%. Over five years, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) compounded fastest (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +0.2%/yr, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -23.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Walker & Dunlop (WD) has the highest dividend yield: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 0.02%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 0.08%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Walker & Dunlop (WD) has been the steadiest (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 52.4%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 46.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do PFSI and WD move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.29, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, PFSI and WD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.