PECO vs SKT vs KIM Stock Comparison

Phillips Edison & Company, Tanger and Kimco Realty Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SKT Tanger Inc.
$38.45 +11.2% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.42B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
3.18%
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$25.89 +17.4% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.20B
P/E
24.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.20B
Div. yield
4.09%
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kimco Realty leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kimco Realty 5, Tanger 5, Phillips Edison & Company 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPECOSKTKIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.31B $4.42B $17.20B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.2x 17.9x 24.0x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 51.4x 35.0x 32.0x KIM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +11.4% +3.5% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.9% 40.3% 32.7% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.1x 5.2x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.24% 3.18% 4.09% KIM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.9% +14.2% +26.7% KIM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.1%/yr +12.5%/yr +1.2%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.6% 21.1% 18.6% PECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 61/100 67/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

PECOSKTKIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPECOSKTKIM
Valuation 22 #114 of 146 70 #45 of 146 48 #76 of 146
Growth 74 #38 of 145 77 #34 of 145 75 #37 of 145
Profitability 56 #63 of 141 99 #3 of 141 79 #30 of 141
Financial Health 57 #63 of 146 48 #77 of 146 64 #53 of 146
Shareholder Returns 42 #79 of 136 10 #123 of 136 70 #41 of 136
Overall 50 61 67
  • PECO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPECOSKTKIMSPY
1 month +10.1%+11.2%+17.4% -1.0%
3 months -1.1%-5.2%+4.2% -0.4%
6 months +2.1%+4.3%+8.8% +4.5%
Year to date +15.7%+15.2%+27.7% +12.4%
1 year +20.9%+14.2%+26.7% +13.6%
3 years +17.2%+60.7%+38.1% +76.4%
3 years, per year +5.4%+17.2%+11.4% +20.8%
5 years +22.3%+80.1%+6.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +4.1%+12.5%+1.2% +10.4%
10 years —+16.1%+3.2% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+1.5%+0.3% +13.9%

Risk

MeasurePECOSKTKIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.6%21.1%18.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 14.4%19.0%16.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.080.250.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.250.671.44 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -24.2%-36.8%-37.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.5%-8.7%-1.9% -1.6%
52-week high $44.01$42.10$26.39 $779.14
52-week low $34.04$31.63$19.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePECOSKTKIM
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 26.6x 17.9xmedian 26.6x 24.0xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 4.3x 7.2xmedian 4.3x 7.8xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.7x 12.6xmedian 14.7x 16.3xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -17.4xmedian 22.1x 13.7xmedian 22.1x 26.2xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.3x 6.3xmedian 1.3x 1.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.66median 2.01 2.04median 2.01 1.63median 2.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPECOSKTKIM
Revenue $761.31M $612.31M $2.20B
Operating income – – $881.20M
Net income $199.72M $246.96M $755.69M
Free cash flow -$305.42M $323.28M $657.16M
EPS (diluted) $1.29 $2.13 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $8.90M $176.88M $544.92M
Total debt $2.52B $1.62B $8.47B
Shares (diluted) 141.31M 115.73M 669.19M
Enterprise value $5.57B $3.99B $15.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPECOSKTKIM
P/E 29.2x 17.9x 24.0x
P/FCF -17.4x 13.7x 26.2x
P/Operating cash flow 14.9x 7.4x 13.9x
P/S 7.0x 7.2x 7.8x
P/B 2.0x 6.3x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 6.3x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – 12.6x 16.3x
EV/EBIT – 19.8x 28.5x
EV/Revenue 10.3x 9.5x 11.4x
EV/FCF -25.6x 18.1x 38.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.0x 9.8x 20.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.66 2.04 1.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPECOSKTKIM
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 11.4% 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 11.0% 7.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 19.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 120.5% 21.3% 24.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 45.9% 12.0% 16.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 118.0% 19.5% 28.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.2% 8.8% 14.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.7% 10.4% 12.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.1% 10.9% 6.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -77.2% 63.7% 39.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -94.4% 10.6% 19.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPECOSKTKIM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 75.4% 70.0%
Operating margin – – 40.1%
Pretax margin – 36.4% 27.1%
Net margin 23.9% 40.3% 32.7%
FCF margin -40.1% 52.8% 29.9%
Operating cash flow margin 46.6% 97.5% 56.3%
Return on equity 7.4% 18.9% 7.3%
Return on assets 3.6% 4.6% 3.8%
Return on invested capital – – 4.6%
Return on capital employed – – 4.4%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 2.4x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 4.3% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPECOSKTKIM
Debt / assets 45.4% 56.6% 43.0%
Debt / equity 0.9x 2.3x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.1x 5.2x
Debt / FCF -8.3x 5.0x 12.9x
Liabilities / assets 51.4% 75.5% 47.7%
Equity / assets 48.6% 24.5% 52.3%
Interest coverage – 4.1x 2.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – 13.7x
Cash ratio – – 8.0x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPECOSKTKIM
Dividend yield 3.2% 3.2% 4.1%
Net buyback yield -1.6% -1.1% 2.3%
Shareholder yield 1.7% 2.1% 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 83.2% – 98.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) -54.4% – 113.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.0% – 4.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPECOSKTKIM
Forward P/E 51.4xFY2026 35.0xFY2026 32.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.80FY2026 $1.10FY2026 $0.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.1%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026 -1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +1.2% +10.0% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $741.12MFY2026 $638.63MFY2026 $2.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.5%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026 +0.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.5% -9.1% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPECOSKTKIM
Held by institutions 89.1% 93.8% 99.4%
Institutions holding 446 362 695
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +2.8% +1.8%
Institutions buying 225 173 370
Institutions selling 134 122 202
Buyers to sellers 1.68 1.42 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PECOSKTKIM
PECO 1.00 0.66 0.78
SKT 0.66 1.00 0.69
KIM 0.78 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PECO, SKT and KIM?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) $5.31B, Tanger (SKT) $4.42B, Kimco Realty (KIM) $17.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, PECO, SKT and KIM?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 29.2x, Tanger (SKT) 17.9x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 24.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kimco Realty (KIM) is cheapest (Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 51.4x, Tanger (SKT) 35.0x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +7.0%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 23.9%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kimco Realty (KIM) returned the most: Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +20.9%, Tanger (SKT) +14.2%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +26.7%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +4.1%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +12.5%/yr, Kimco Realty (KIM) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest dividend yield: Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 3.24%, Tanger (SKT) 3.18%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.09%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) has been the steadiest (Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 16.6%, Tanger (SKT) 21.1%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PECO, SKT and KIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimco Realty (KIM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.