PCSV vs FNKO vs TBCH Stock Comparison

PCS Edventures!, Funko and Turtle Beach Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PCSV PCS Edventures!, Inc.
$1.39 -6.1% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.45M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.67M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win
FNKO Funko, Inc.
$6.52 +18.5% 1M +106.3% 1Y
Market cap
$365.88M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$932.64M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
TBCH Turtle Beach Corp
$16.58 +30.1% 1M -2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$316.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$297.77M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Funko leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Funko 7, Turtle Beach 2, PCS Edventures! 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPCSVFNKOTBCHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.45M $365.88M $316.69M FNKO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -114.7x -181.0x -99.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.8x 29.6x FNKO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -15.2% -3.9% -17.5% FNKO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.1% -0.2% -1.1% FNKO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% 5.6% TBCH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.9x 2.8x FNKO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.3% +106.3% -2.4% FNKO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.3%/yr -16.6%/yr -10.3%/yr PCSV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 358.6% 66.6% 51.3% TBCH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 61/100 60/100 FNKO

Percentile Scorecard

PCSVFNKOTBCH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPCSVFNKOTBCH
Valuation 12 #30 of 34 73 #10 of 34 49 #22 of 42
Growth 0 #32 of 32 90 #4 of 32 46 #23 of 42
Profitability 42 #19 of 32 55 #15 of 32 59 #17 of 40
Financial Health 97 #2 of 33 25 #25 of 33 51 #22 of 44
Shareholder Returns – – 96 #2 of 28
Overall 38 61 60
  • PCSV ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • FNKO ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • TBCH ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPCSVFNKOTBCHSPY
1 month -6.1%+18.5%+30.1% -0.2%
3 months -18.2%+2.7%+27.4% +3.9%
6 months -22.8%+47.8%+49.4% +8.2%
Year to date -10.9%+91.8%+18.2% +12.9%
1 year -17.3%+106.3%-2.4% +12.3%
3 years -39.0%-11.4%+106.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -15.2%-4.0%+27.4% +23.3%
5 years +131.7%-59.6%-41.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +18.3%-16.6%-10.3% +10.9%
10 years +44.8%—+231.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +3.8%—+12.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePCSVFNKOTBCHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 358.6%66.6%51.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 577.3%57.7%48.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.161.991.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.051.60-0.05 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.8%-90.9%-78.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.8%-8.2%-2.4% -1.2%
52-week high $1.80$7.10$16.98 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$2.81$10.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePCSVFNKOTBCH
P/E now vs peer median -114.7xmedian 17.8x -180.1xmedian 17.8x -99.7xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.1x 0.4xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -49.3xmedian 9.4x 6.2xmedian 9.4x 16.3xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -41.3xmedian 10.2x 13.4xmedian 10.2x 9.2xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.4x 1.9xmedian 1.4x 3.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.08median 0.32 -2.30median 0.32 -1.57median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPCSVFNKOTBCH
Revenue $5.67M $932.64M $297.77M
Gross profit $3.40M $418.81M $110.81M
Operating income -$251.02K $24.91M $9.20M
Net income -$117.38K -$1.02M -$3.19M
Free cash flow -$325.37K $27.24M $32.25M
R&D – – $17.81M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $-0.04 $-0.17
Cash & equivalents $2.65M $40.71M $19.57M
Total debt – $201.10M $80.69M
Shares (diluted) 9.68M 57.46M 19.18M
Enterprise value $1.88M $209.55M $255.59M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPCSVFNKOTBCH
P/E -114.7x -180.1x -99.7x
P/FCF -41.3x 13.4x 9.2x
P/Operating cash flow -43.2x 5.8x 8.7x
P/S 2.4x 0.4x 1.0x
P/B 1.7x 1.9x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 6.1x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA -49.3x 6.2x 16.3x
EV/EBIT -43.0x 21.1x 38.9x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 0.6x 1.2x
EV/FCF -33.2x 19.3x 11.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -34.7x 8.3x 10.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.08 -2.30 -1.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPCSVFNKOTBCH
Revenue growth (1Y) -15.2% -3.9% -17.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.5% -7.8% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -15.3% 9.3% -14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 7.0% 27.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -140.2% 161.1% -70.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.2% 29.7% 30.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -121.9% 98.4% -116.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.9% 82.0% 61.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -376.7% 97.1% -117.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -37.2% 78.2% 63.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -119.5% 236.9% 19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.2% 69.4% 13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -121.1% 259.8% 29.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.4% 33.7% 17.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPCSVFNKOTBCH
Gross margin 59.9% 44.9% 37.2%
EBITDA margin -3.9% 9.1% 7.4%
Operating margin -4.4% 2.7% 3.1%
Pretax margin -2.6% 0.5% -0.5%
Net margin -2.1% -0.2% -1.1%
FCF margin -5.7% 2.9% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin -5.5% 6.7% 11.4%
Return on equity -1.5% -1.1% -3.3%
Return on assets -1.3% -0.3% -1.5%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% 5.6%
Return on capital employed -3.0% 6.2% 5.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.5x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x -61.8x -10.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 1.1% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPCSVFNKOTBCH
Debt / assets – 30.8% 37.5%
Debt / equity – 1.1x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.9x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 7.4x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 12.7% 71.2% 62.5%
Equity / assets 87.3% 28.8% 37.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 13.5x 1.2x 2.4x
Quick ratio 7.8x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 6.3x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.43 1.71 2.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPCSVFNKOTBCH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 12.7%
Shareholder yield – – 12.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPCSVFNKOTBCH
Forward P/E – 14.8xFY2026 29.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.44FY2026 $0.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -27.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -27.3% +82.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $905.55MFY2026 $360.68MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -0.3%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +18.4% +10.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPCSVFNKOTBCH
Held by institutions – 83.9% 68.8%
Institutions holding – 125 112
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.1% +3.8%
Institutions buying – 67 58
Institutions selling – 40 37
Buyers to sellers – 1.68 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PCSVFNKOTBCH
PCSV 1.00 0.08 -0.01
FNKO 0.08 1.00 0.32
TBCH -0.01 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PCSV, FNKO and TBCH?

Funko (FNKO) is the largest by market capitalisation: PCS Edventures! (PCSV) $13.45M, Funko (FNKO) $365.88M, Turtle Beach (TBCH) $316.69M.

Which company is growing faster?

Funko (FNKO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: PCS Edventures! (PCSV) -15.2%, Funko (FNKO) -3.9%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -17.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Funko (FNKO) has the highest net margin (PCS Edventures! (PCSV) -2.1%, Funko (FNKO) -0.2%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -1.1%). On return on invested capital, Turtle Beach (TBCH) leads (Funko (FNKO) 0.0%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 5.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Funko (FNKO) returned the most: PCS Edventures! (PCSV) -17.3%, Funko (FNKO) +106.3%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -2.4%. Over five years, PCS Edventures! (PCSV) compounded fastest (PCS Edventures! (PCSV) +18.3%/yr, Funko (FNKO) -16.6%/yr, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turtle Beach (TBCH) has been the steadiest (PCS Edventures! (PCSV) 358.6%, Funko (FNKO) 66.6%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 51.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PCSV, FNKO and TBCH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Funko (FNKO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.