PC vs TXRH vs HDL Stock Comparison

Premium Catering (Holdings), Texas Roadhouse and Super Hi International Holding Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
$165.82 +3.8% 1M -5.5% 1Y
Market cap
$10.89B
P/E
26.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.23B
Div. yield
0.02%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Texas Roadhouse leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Texas Roadhouse 4, Super Hi International Holding 2, Premium Catering (Holdings) 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPCTXRHHDLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $274.48M $10.89B $582.48M TXRH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 26.4x 56.7x TXRH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 24.7x 19.2x HDL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.9% +10.5% HDL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.6% 1.2% TXRH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -5.5% -41.3% PC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +13.4%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 31.1% 39.1% PC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 60/100 59/100 TXRH

Percentile Scorecard

PCTXRHHDL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPCTXRHHDL
Valuation – 37 #32 of 50 80 #11 of 50
Growth – 54 #22 of 47 24 #36 of 47
Profitability – 78 #11 of 46 56 #21 of 46
Financial Health 94 #4 of 51 72 #15 of 51 76 #13 of 51
Shareholder Returns – 59 #14 of 33 –
Overall – 60 59
  • PC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • TXRH ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • HDL ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPCTXRHHDLSPY
1 month 0.0%+3.8%-11.7% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-17.5%-20.3% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%+5.0%-27.0% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%-0.1%-35.4% +12.2%
1 year 0.0%-5.5%-41.3% +13.0%
3 years —+69.7%— +86.3%
3 years, per year —+19.3%— +23.1%
5 years —+87.4%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —+13.4%— +11.0%
10 years —+326.7%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+15.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePCTXRHHDLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%31.1%39.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —27.9%49.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.200.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.18-1.06 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.3%-27.3%-66.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-22.6%-43.4% -1.8%
52-week high $9.40$214.28$18.32 $779.14
52-week low $9.40$155.88$9.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePCTXRHHDL
P/E now vs peer median —median 20.5x 26.4xmedian 20.5x 59.4xmedian 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.1x 1.7xmedian 1.1x 0.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.3x 15.2xmedian 13.3x -5.8xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 17.5x 26.8xmedian 17.5x 5.6xmedian 17.5x
P/B now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 3.1x 6.9xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 2.00median 1.07 —median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPCTXRHHDL
Revenue – $6.23B $888.78M
Operating income – $482.80M –
Net income – $422.09M $10.19M
Free cash flow – $406.39M $120.84M
EPS (diluted) – $6.27 –
Cash & equivalents $971.86K $202.43M $266.40M
Total debt – $50.00M –
Shares (diluted) 29.20M 65.92M –
Enterprise value $270.03M $10.23B -$410.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPCTXRHHDL
P/E – 26.4x 59.4x
P/FCF – 26.8x 5.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.5x 5.6x
P/S – 1.7x 0.8x
P/B 28.0x 6.9x –
P/Tangible book 28.0x 7.0x –
EV/EBITDA – 15.2x -5.8x
EV/EBIT – 22.2x 28.0x
EV/Revenue – 1.7x 0.5x
EV/FCF – 26.4x 3.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.3x 3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.00 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPCTXRHHDL
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.9% 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -7.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -5.8% -81.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -4.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 8.2% 2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 8.8% 2.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 24.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPCTXRHHDL
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 11.3% -7.9%
Operating margin – 7.7% –
Pretax margin – 7.8% 3.0%
Net margin – 6.6% 1.2%
FCF margin – 6.5% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.9% 13.6%
Return on equity – 27.1% –
Return on assets – 11.6% –
Return on invested capital – 26.0% –
Return on capital employed – 17.0% –
Asset turnover – 1.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 11.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPCTXRHHDL
Debt / assets – 1.4% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.2x –
Debt / FCF – 0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 13.7% 57.0% –
Equity / assets 86.3% 43.0% –
Interest coverage – – 1.2x
Current ratio 9.6x 0.5x –
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.3x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.3x 2.0x
Altman Z-score – 5.70 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPCTXRHHDL
Dividend yield – 1.8% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 44.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 46.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPCTXRHHDL
Forward P/E – 24.7xFY2026 19.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.71FY2026 $0.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.0%FY2026 -10.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.6% +44.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $6.74BFY2026 $891.81MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +14.7%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +8.4% +13.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPCTXRHHDL
Held by institutions – 99.0% –
Institutions holding – 646 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.0% –
Institutions buying – 311 –
Institutions selling – 249 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.25 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PCTXRHHDL
PC – – –
TXRH – 1.00 -0.09
HDL – -0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PC, TXRH and HDL?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) $274.48M, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) $10.89B, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) $582.48M.

Which stock is cheaper, PC, TXRH and HDL?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 26.4x, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 56.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) is cheapest (Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 24.7x, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 19.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Hi International Holding (HDL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) +9.9%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) +10.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) has the highest net margin (Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 6.6%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) returned the most: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) -5.5%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) -41.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.00%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 0.02%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 0.00%. Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) and Super Hi International Holding (HDL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) has been the steadiest (Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) 31.1%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 39.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PC, TXRH and HDL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.