PC vs DIN vs WYNN Stock Comparison

Premium Catering (Holdings), Dine Brands Global and Wynn Resorts Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.
$31.94 +13.3% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$404.72M
P/E
60.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$899.84M
Div. yield
2.38%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
WYNN Wynn Resorts Ltd
$74.20 -8.5% 1M -40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.67B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.41B
Div. yield
1.35%
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Wynn Resorts leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Wynn Resorts 7, Dine Brands Global 4, Premium Catering (Holdings) 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPCDINWYNNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $274.48M $404.72M $7.67B WYNN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 60.9x 17.0x WYNN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.1x 17.2x DIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +6.4% +6.4% DIN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 0.7% 6.1% WYNN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 1.9% 10.1% WYNN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 14.7x 5.0x WYNN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 2.38% 1.35% DIN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% +15.2% -40.9% DIN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -17.5%/yr -4.2%/yr WYNN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 44.5% 32.3% PC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 24/100 59/100 WYNN

Percentile Scorecard

PCDINWYNN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPCDINWYNN
Valuation – 33 #13 of 19 95 #2 of 21
Growth – 0 #17 of 17 79 #5 of 20
Profitability – 20 #13 of 16 72 #6 of 19
Financial Health 95 #2 of 20 5 #19 of 20 26 #18 of 24
Shareholder Returns – 63 #4 of 9 22 #8 of 10
Overall – 24 59
  • PC ranked among 22 companies in Restaurants
  • DIN ranked among 22 companies in Restaurants
  • WYNN ranked among 24 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPCDINWYNNSPY
1 month 0.0%+13.3%-8.5% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-9.4%-25.6% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%+15.9%-29.7% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%-0.6%-38.3% +12.2%
1 year 0.0%+15.2%-40.9% +13.0%
3 years —-34.6%-15.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-13.2%-5.3% +23.1%
5 years —-61.8%-19.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-17.5%-4.2% +11.0%
10 years —-59.0%-22.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-8.5%-2.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePCDINWYNNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%44.5%32.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —43.4%32.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.540.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —0.34-1.27 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.3%-79.9%-46.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-17.7%-44.2% -1.8%
52-week high $9.40$38.81$133.09 $779.14
52-week low $9.40$24.15$72.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePCDINWYNN
P/E now vs peer median —median 16.8x 60.9xmedian 16.8x 17.0xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.0x 0.4xmedian 1.0x 1.0xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.9x 20.1xmedian 9.9x 9.1xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 17.5x 64.2xmedian 17.5x 9.7xmedian 12.8x
P/B now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 3.9x -1.4xmedian 3.9x -8.5xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.52 -1.15median 0.52 0.05median 0.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPCDINWYNN
Revenue – $899.84M $7.41B
Gross profit – $355.26M $2.30B
Operating income – $24.72M $1.17B
Net income – $6.79M $583.88M
Free cash flow – $6.30M $791.87M
EPS (diluted) – $0.52 $4.36
Cash & equivalents $971.86K $97.50M $1.57B
Total debt – $1.19B $10.72B
Shares (diluted) 29.20M 12.10M 102.98M
Enterprise value $270.03M -$93.18M $1.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPCDINWYNN
P/E – 60.9x 17.0x
P/FCF – 64.2x 9.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.3x 5.3x
P/S – 0.4x 1.0x
P/B 28.0x -1.4x -8.5x
P/Tangible book 28.0x -0.5x -6.9x
EV/EBITDA – 20.1x 9.1x
EV/EBIT – 60.5x 14.4x
EV/Revenue – 1.7x 2.3x
EV/FCF – 237.6x 21.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 26.8x 11.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.15 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPCDINWYNN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 6.4% 6.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.4% 14.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -1.6% 2.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.1% -9.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -58.8% 12.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -36.1% 35.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – -85.3% 30.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -55.7% 98.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -82.6% 17.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -52.8% 312.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -48.9% 12.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.3% 33.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -93.2% 6.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -51.9% 40.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPCDINWYNN
Gross margin – 39.5% 31.0%
EBITDA margin – 8.3% 24.9%
Operating margin – 2.7% 15.7%
Pretax margin – 1.1% 9.4%
Net margin – 0.7% 6.1%
FCF margin – 0.7% 10.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 6.2% 19.7%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets – 0.4% 4.5%
Return on invested capital – 1.9% 10.1%
Return on capital employed – 1.8% 11.5%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 8.2x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPCDINWYNN
Debt / assets – 67.1% 81.5%
Debt / equity – -4.1x -11.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 14.7x 5.0x
Debt / FCF – 188.8x 13.5x
Liabilities / assets 13.7% 116.5% 106.9%
Equity / assets 86.3% -16.5% -6.9%
Interest coverage – – 1.9x
Current ratio 9.6x 0.9x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 0.78 1.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPCDINWYNN
Dividend yield – 2.4% 1.3%
Net buyback yield – 20.4% 2.2%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 22.7% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 294.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 317.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -14.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPCDINWYNN
Forward P/E – 7.1xFY2026 17.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.51FY2026 $4.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +1.3%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.9% -3.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $924.09MFY2026 $7.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +5.1%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.6% -7.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPCDINWYNN
Held by institutions – 97.9% 71.9%
Institutions holding – 149 497
Change in shares held, QoQ – +8.2% +3.9%
Institutions buying – 67 212
Institutions selling – 53 192
Buyers to sellers – 1.26 1.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PCDINWYNN
PC – – –
DIN – 1.00 0.33
WYNN – 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PC, DIN and WYNN?

Wynn Resorts (WYNN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) $274.48M, Dine Brands Global (DIN) $404.72M, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) $7.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, PC, DIN and WYNN?

Wynn Resorts (WYNN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 60.9x, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dine Brands Global (DIN) is cheapest (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 7.1x, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 17.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Dine Brands Global (DIN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dine Brands Global (DIN) +6.4%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) +6.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wynn Resorts (WYNN) has the highest net margin (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 0.7%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 6.1%). On return on invested capital, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) leads (Dine Brands Global (DIN) 1.9%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dine Brands Global (DIN) returned the most: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) +15.2%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) -40.9%. Over five years, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) compounded fastest (Dine Brands Global (DIN) -17.5%/yr, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) -4.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dine Brands Global (DIN) has the highest dividend yield: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.00%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 2.38%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 1.35%. Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) has been the steadiest (Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 44.5%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 32.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PC, DIN and WYNN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.