PBA vs ET vs TRGP Stock Comparison

Pembina Pipeline, Energy Transfer and Targa Resources Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PBA Pembina Pipeline Corp
$50.33 +12.7% 1M +32.3% 1Y
Market cap
$29.04B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.84B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
2 wins
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.61 +2.0% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$70.32B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
6 wins
TRGP Targa Resources Corp.
$304.61 +9.6% 1M +98.1% 1Y
Market cap
$64.85B
P/E
28.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.74B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Energy Transfer leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Energy Transfer 6, Targa Resources 3, Pembina Pipeline 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPBAETTRGPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.04B $70.32B $64.85B ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 13.9x 28.6x ET
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.6x 11.5x 28.7x ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.9% +33.3% -2.0% ET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.1% 4.7% 13.5% PBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.3% 8.4% 13.2% TRGP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 4.0x 3.5x PBA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.07% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +32.3% +23.2% +98.1% TRGP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.7%/yr +16.2%/yr +40.9%/yr TRGP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.3% 17.5% 28.5% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 63/100 41/100 ET

Percentile Scorecard

PBAETTRGP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPBAETTRGP
Valuation 79 #8 of 35 94 #3 of 35 15 #30 of 35
Growth 21 #27 of 34 61 #14 of 34 79 #8 of 34
Profitability 55 #16 of 34 30 #24 of 34 70 #11 of 34
Financial Health 88 #5 of 35 59 #15 of 35 27 #26 of 35
Shareholder Returns 40 #19 of 31 70 #10 of 31 17 #26 of 31
Overall 57 63 41
  • PBA ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • TRGP ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPBAETTRGPSPY
1 month +12.7%+2.0%+9.6% -0.8%
3 months +0.8%+3.5%+13.8% +3.5%
6 months +16.1%+8.2%+26.2% +7.0%
Year to date +32.2%+25.0%+65.1% +12.2%
1 year +32.3%+23.2%+98.1% +13.0%
3 years +65.4%+57.2%+261.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +18.3%+16.3%+53.4% +23.1%
5 years +51.6%+111.8%+455.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +8.7%+16.2%+40.9% +11.0%
10 years +61.8%+30.9%+551.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.9%+2.7%+20.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePBAETTRGPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.3%17.5%28.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.9%16.6%26.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.23-0.21-0.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.591.333.44 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.6%-25.8%-32.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.0%-5.2%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $51.38$21.74$304.61 $779.14
52-week low $36.52$16.21$151.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePBAETTRGP
P/E now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 21.0x 14.1xmedian 21.0x 28.8xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 2.7x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 11.0x 8.2xmedian 11.0x 15.4xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 16.6x 13.6xmedian 16.6x 88.2xmedian 16.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.6x 1.4xmedian 2.6x 17.2xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.92 2.01median 1.92 0.70median 1.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPBAETTRGP
Revenue $7.84B $107.38B $16.74B
Gross profit $3.30B $25.32B $7.23B
Operating income $2.83B $10.78B $3.84B
Net income $1.71B $7.04B $2.30B
Free cash flow $3.49B $5.22B $740.90M
EPS (diluted) $2.71 $1.46 $10.54
Cash & equivalents $153.00M $1.02B $132.30M
Total debt $12.08B $68.41B $19.58B
Shares (diluted) 582.00M 3.46B 215.20M
Enterprise value $28.48B $63.51B $64.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPBAETTRGP
P/E 18.5x 14.1x 28.8x
P/FCF 8.4x 13.6x 88.2x
P/Operating cash flow 10.1x 5.9x 15.2x
P/S 3.7x 0.7x 3.9x
P/B 1.7x 1.4x 17.2x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.6x 38.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.8x 8.2x 15.4x
EV/EBIT 14.6x 12.8x 22.1x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 1.3x 5.1x
EV/FCF 11.8x 26.5x 114.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.2x 11.4x 19.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.01 0.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPBAETTRGP
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.9% 33.3% -2.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% -2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.9% 18.9% 18.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 12.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.9% 16.5% 27.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.0% 15.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.9% 16.1% 29.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 9.0% 12.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -3.0% 12.6% 49.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.0% 41.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -16.0% 8.8% 16.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% 14.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -14.7% -8.5% 73.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.3% -4.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPBAETTRGP
Gross margin 42.1% 23.6% 43.2%
EBITDA margin 48.5% 15.7% 32.9%
Operating margin 36.1% 10.0% 22.9%
Pretax margin 28.2% 7.1% 17.5%
Net margin 20.1% 4.7% 13.5%
FCF margin 44.5% 4.9% 4.4%
Operating cash flow margin 37.0% 11.3% 25.6%
Return on equity 10.1% 14.0% 65.2%
Return on assets 4.7% 4.8% 8.3%
Return on invested capital 8.3% 8.4% 13.2%
Return on capital employed – 8.4% 15.7%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.7x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 0.2% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPBAETTRGP
Debt / assets 33.3% 46.2% 68.7%
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.4x 5.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 4.0x 3.5x
Debt / FCF 3.5x 13.1x 26.4x
Liabilities / assets 52.9% 65.9% 86.7%
Equity / assets 47.1% 34.1% 13.3%
Interest coverage 4.6x 2.9x –
Current ratio – 1.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – – 2.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPBAETTRGP
Dividend yield 5.7% 6.5% 1.5%
Net buyback yield -0.7% – 0.5%
Shareholder yield 5.0% 6.5% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 67.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 91.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPBAETTRGP
Forward P/E 21.6xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 28.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.33FY2026 $1.80FY2026 $10.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.1%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026 +24.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.4% -9.4% +24.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.58BFY2026 $124.23BFY2026 $19.51BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.2% +1.4% +14.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPBAETTRGP
Held by institutions – 31.4% 93.5%
Institutions holding – 1,279 1,085
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.9% +2.9%
Institutions buying – 628 558
Institutions selling – 340 353
Buyers to sellers – 1.85 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PBAETTRGP
PBA 1.00 0.59 0.63
ET 0.59 1.00 0.60
TRGP 0.63 0.60 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PBA, ET and TRGP?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Pembina Pipeline (PBA) $29.04B, Energy Transfer (ET) $70.32B, Targa Resources (TRGP) $64.85B.

Which stock is cheaper, PBA, ET and TRGP?

Energy Transfer (ET) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 18.4x, Energy Transfer (ET) 13.9x, Targa Resources (TRGP) 28.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 21.6x, Energy Transfer (ET) 11.5x, Targa Resources (TRGP) 28.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Transfer (ET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Pembina Pipeline (PBA) +0.9%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Targa Resources (TRGP) -2.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) has the highest net margin (Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 20.1%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Targa Resources (TRGP) 13.5%). On return on invested capital, Targa Resources (TRGP) leads (Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 8.3%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Targa Resources (TRGP) 13.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Targa Resources (TRGP) returned the most: Pembina Pipeline (PBA) +32.3%, Energy Transfer (ET) +23.2%, Targa Resources (TRGP) +98.1%. Over five years, Targa Resources (TRGP) compounded fastest (Pembina Pipeline (PBA) +8.7%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +16.2%/yr, Targa Resources (TRGP) +40.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 0.00%, Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Targa Resources (TRGP) 0.00%. Pembina Pipeline (PBA) and Targa Resources (TRGP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Pembina Pipeline (PBA) 20.3%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Targa Resources (TRGP) 28.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PBA, ET and TRGP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Transfer (ET) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.