PAYD vs BLIV vs RZLV Stock Comparison

Paid, BeLive Holdings and Rezolve Ai Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PAYD Paid Inc
$2.20 -10.6% 1M -27.2% 1Y
Market cap
$20.25M
P/E
157.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.10M
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology
2 wins
BLIV BeLive Holdings
$2.32 +2.7% 1M -32.4% 1Y
Market cap
$26.88M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology
RZLV Rezolve Ai Plc
$1.48 -30.2% 1M -65.8% 1Y
Market cap
$238.58M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Paid leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Paid 2, Rezolve Ai 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAYDBLIVRZLVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.25M $26.88M $238.58M RZLV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 157.0x -4.6x -2.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.2% -32.4% -65.8% PAYD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.3%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.4% 82.3% 99.6% PAYD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

PAYDBLIVRZLV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAYDBLIVRZLV
Valuation 40 #100 of 166 7 #154 of 166 8 #153 of 166
Growth 57 #67 of 153 – –
Profitability 51 #76 of 153 – –
Financial Health 43 #102 of 179 99 #3 of 179 27 #131 of 179
Shareholder Returns 29 #65 of 91 – –
Overall 44 – –
  • PAYD ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BLIV ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • RZLV ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAYDBLIVRZLVSPY
1 month -10.6%+2.7%-30.2% +0.7%
3 months -10.6%+5.5%-37.8% +3.7%
6 months -6.8%-5.3%-42.4% +7.1%
Year to date -26.4%-35.2%-42.4% +12.8%
1 year -27.2%-32.4%-65.8% +11.9%
3 years +29.4%—-86.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +9.0%—-48.3% +22.8%
5 years -6.4%—— +67.6%
5 years, per year -1.3%—— +10.9%

Risk

MeasurePAYDBLIVRZLVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.4%82.3%99.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 120.1%96.7%91.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.040.272.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.46-0.39-0.66 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-68.4%-91.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.3%-41.3%-68.0% -1.2%
52-week high $3.30$3.95$4.63 $779.14
52-week low $1.95$2.10$1.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAYDBLIVRZLV
P/E now vs peer median 147.0xmedian 16.7x -4.6xmedian 16.7x -2.4xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.4x 43.5xmedian 1.4x 6.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 271.8xmedian 12.7x —median 12.7x —median 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.0xmedian 10.5x -8.9xmedian 10.5x -4.9xmedian 10.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.7x 3.7xmedian 1.7x 1.2xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -4.51median 0.39 —median 0.39 —median 0.39

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAYDBLIVRZLV
Revenue $22.10M – –
Gross profit $4.71M – –
Operating income -$229.23K – –
Net income $128.94K – –
Free cash flow $282.66K – –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 – –
Cash & equivalents $1.08M $6.68M $111.11M
Total debt – – $247.46M
Shares (diluted) 8.55M 10.14M 162.86M
Enterprise value $15.96M $26.88M $107.68M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAYDBLIVRZLV
P/E 147.0x -4.6x -2.4x
P/FCF 66.0x -8.9x -4.9x
P/Operating cash flow 65.3x – –
P/S 0.8x 43.5x 6.6x
P/B 3.3x 3.7x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 4.8x 3.9x 40.5x
EV/EBITDA 271.8x – –
EV/EBIT -76.7x – –
EV/Revenue 0.8x – –
EV/FCF 62.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 61.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.51 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAYDBLIVRZLV
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.6% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.0% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 75.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 24.3% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 115.1% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.1% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 114.7% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.6% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 140.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.2% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 142.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAYDBLIVRZLV
Gross margin 21.3% – –
EBITDA margin 0.3% – –
Operating margin -1.0% – –
Pretax margin -0.5% – –
Net margin 0.6% – –
FCF margin 1.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 1.3% – –
Return on equity 2.3% – –
Return on assets 1.5% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -3.6% – –
Asset turnover 2.6x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x – –
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAYDBLIVRZLV
Debt / assets – – 25.2%
Debt / equity – – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 32.5% 5.8% 59.7%
Equity / assets 67.5% 94.2% 40.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 17.1x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.7x 17.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.5x 16.6x 0.4x
Altman Z-score -4.92 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAYDBLIVRZLV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAYDBLIVRZLV
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.50FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $368.55MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +687.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +40.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAYDBLIVRZLV
Held by institutions – – 19.7%
Institutions holding – – 114
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -32.8%
Institutions buying – – 62
Institutions selling – – 43
Buyers to sellers – – 1.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAYDBLIVRZLV
PAYD 1.00 -0.04 0.01
BLIV -0.04 1.00 0.05
RZLV 0.01 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAYD, BLIV and RZLV?

Rezolve Ai (RZLV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Paid (PAYD) $20.25M, BeLive Holdings (BLIV) $26.88M, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) $238.58M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Paid (PAYD) returned the most: Paid (PAYD) -27.2%, BeLive Holdings (BLIV) -32.4%, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) -65.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Paid (PAYD) has been the steadiest (Paid (PAYD) 58.4%, BeLive Holdings (BLIV) 82.3%, Rezolve Ai (RZLV) 99.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAYD, BLIV and RZLV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Paid (PAYD) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.