PARA vs RAMP vs MCHX Stock Comparison

Banzai International, LiveRamp Holdings and Marchex Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RAMP LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
$38.22 +1.9% 1M +35.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.31B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$832.10M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
7 wins
MCHX Marchex Inc
$1.44 +9.9% 1M -20.9% 1Y
Market cap
$65.14M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$45.02M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

LiveRamp Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (LiveRamp Holdings 7, Banzai International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPARARAMPMCHXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.35M $2.31B $65.14M RAMP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.2x 14.8x -17.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.4x 36.0x RAMP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +19.6% +8.9% -5.3% PARA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -228.7% 18.7% -8.1% RAMP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -113.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -90.2% +35.6% -20.9% RAMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -86.5%/yr -6.3%/yr -15.0%/yr RAMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 283.3% 37.2% 50.1% RAMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 85/100 54/100 RAMP

Percentile Scorecard

PARARAMPMCHX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPARARAMPMCHX
Valuation 29 #72 of 101 91 #10 of 101 64 #37 of 101
Growth 37 #62 of 97 85 #15 of 97 33 #65 of 97
Profitability 10 #85 of 94 77 #22 of 94 43 #54 of 94
Financial Health 26 #80 of 108 93 #9 of 108 76 #27 of 108
Shareholder Returns – 78 #15 of 64 –
Overall 25 85 54
  • PARA ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • RAMP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • MCHX ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPARARAMPMCHXSPY
1 month +525.7%+1.9%+9.9% -0.2%
3 months +129.3%+1.2%-19.6% +3.9%
6 months -44.8%+28.5%-17.7% +8.2%
Year to date -77.3%+30.1%-13.3% +12.9%
1 year -90.2%+35.6%-20.9% +12.3%
3 years -100.0%+39.7%+11.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year -96.6%+11.8%+3.7% +23.3%
5 years -100.0%-27.7%-55.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -86.5%-6.3%-15.0% +10.9%
10 years —+59.3%-43.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+4.8%-5.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePARARAMPMCHXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 283.3%37.2%50.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 159.7%30.0%52.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.630.360.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.320.96-0.42 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-72.7%-65.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -90.2%-0.1%-24.2% -1.2%
52-week high $44.80$38.24$1.90 $779.14
52-week low $0.41$22.42$1.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePARARAMPMCHX
P/E now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 28.3x 14.9xmedian 28.3x -17.4xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.8x 2.8xmedian 2.8x 1.3xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.4xmedian 17.3x 17.8xmedian 17.3x —median 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.1xmedian 15.8x 11.7xmedian 15.8x —median 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 3.2x 2.4xmedian 3.2x 2.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 0.85 0.27median 0.85 -0.51median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPARARAMPMCHX
Revenue $10.62M $832.10M $45.02M
Gross profit $8.63M $589.26M $28.09M
Operating income -$18.88M $96.41M -$4.20M
Net income -$24.30M $155.72M -$3.66M
Free cash flow -$16.08M $198.85M –
R&D – $145.67M $9.07M
EPS (diluted) $-14.94 $2.52 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $646.00K $363.52M $8.15M
Total debt $32.30M – –
Shares (diluted) 1.63M 61.85M 48.98M
Enterprise value $3.46M $772.32M $26.24M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPARARAMPMCHX
P/E -0.3x 14.9x -17.4x
P/FCF -0.1x 11.7x –
P/Operating cash flow -0.1x 11.6x –
P/S 0.1x 2.8x 1.3x
P/B 0.1x 2.4x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 2.4x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA -0.4x 17.8x –
EV/EBIT -0.3x 20.3x -11.7x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 2.3x 1.1x
EV/FCF -0.4x 9.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -0.4x 9.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 0.27 -0.51

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPARARAMPMCHX
Revenue growth (1Y) 19.6% 8.9% -5.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 11.0% -3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.0% 8.7% -8.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.8% -0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -14.9% 439.4% 12.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -23.4% 44.0% 30.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.2% 979.7% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 54.3% 33.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 95.9% 1,065% 21.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.1% 56.0% 34.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.8% 36.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.2% 29.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.8% 35.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.2% 30.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPARARAMPMCHX
Gross margin 81.2% 70.8% 62.4%
EBITDA margin -166.3% 13.2% –
Operating margin -177.7% 11.6% -9.3%
Pretax margin -227.9% 13.3% -7.9%
Net margin -228.7% 18.7% -8.1%
FCF margin -151.4% 23.9% –
Operating cash flow margin -151.4% 24.1% –
Return on equity -239.1% 16.0% -12.4%
Return on assets -77.4% 12.1% -9.5%
Return on invested capital -113.0% – –
Return on capital employed -141.2% 9.2% -13.5%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.6x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 38.3% 9.4% 5.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPARARAMPMCHX
Debt / assets 17.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.5x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – –
Debt / FCF -0.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 60.9% 23.6% 22.9%
Equity / assets 39.1% 76.4% 77.1%
Interest coverage -4.6x – –
Current ratio 0.1x 2.7x 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.1x 2.5x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.6x 1.1x
Altman Z-score -7.33 7.51 -7.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPARARAMPMCHX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -403.2% 7.6% –
Shareholder yield -403.2% 7.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPARARAMPMCHX
Forward P/E – 12.4xFY2026 36.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-8.12FY2026 $3.07FY2026 $0.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +35.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +11.1% +300.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $14.14MFY2026 $843.08MFY2026 $57.01MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026 +25.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +53.6% +8.2% +29.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPARARAMPMCHX
Held by institutions 0.0% 100.0% 48.0%
Institutions holding 1 307 29
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.5% +0.2%
Institutions buying 1 165 8
Institutions selling 0 106 9
Buyers to sellers – 1.56 0.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PARARAMPMCHX
PARA 1.00 -0.08 0.22
RAMP -0.08 1.00 0.06
MCHX 0.22 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PARA, RAMP and MCHX?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banzai International (PARA) $5.35M, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) $2.31B, Marchex (MCHX) $65.14M.

Which company is growing faster?

Banzai International (PARA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Banzai International (PARA) +19.6%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +8.9%, Marchex (MCHX) -5.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has the highest net margin (Banzai International (PARA) -228.7%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 18.7%, Marchex (MCHX) -8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) returned the most: Banzai International (PARA) -90.2%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +35.6%, Marchex (MCHX) -20.9%. Over five years, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) compounded fastest (Banzai International (PARA) -86.5%/yr, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) -6.3%/yr, Marchex (MCHX) -15.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has been the steadiest (Banzai International (PARA) 283.3%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 37.2%, Marchex (MCHX) 50.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PARA, RAMP and MCHX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.