PAPL vs UWMC vs FIGR Stock Comparison

Pineapple Financial, UWM Holdings and Figure Technology Solutions Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.51 +20.8% 1M -74.1% 1Y
Market cap
$511.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Figure Technology Solutions leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Figure Technology Solutions 6, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAPLUWMCFIGRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.47M $511.35M $5.21B FIGR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.0x -13.8x 22.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.9x 21.8x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.6% +26.1% +88.8% FIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -90.1% -1.0% 33.5% FIGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.3% 8.9% FIGR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 26.6x 10.6x — UWMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -80.4% -74.1% -46.1% FIGR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -26.0%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 137.7% 80.2% 94.1% UWMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 35/100 53/100 FIGR

Percentile Scorecard

PAPLUWMCFIGR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAPLUWMCFIGR
Valuation 7 #157 of 169 20 #136 of 169 14 #146 of 169
Growth 39 #100 of 162 16 #137 of 162 98 #4 of 162
Profitability 12 #131 of 149 30 #105 of 149 71 #44 of 149
Financial Health 54 #74 of 158 17 #132 of 158 80 #32 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 94 #9 of 136 4 #131 of 136
Overall 28 35 53
  • PAPL ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FIGR ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAPLUWMCFIGRSPY
1 month -17.8%+20.8%-20.5% +0.9%
3 months -25.4%-24.1%-6.6% +5.9%
6 months -34.8%-56.5%-29.9% +8.5%
Year to date -37.6%-65.5%-42.9% +13.3%
1 year -80.4%-74.1%-46.1% +12.4%
3 years —-69.7%— +88.1%
3 years, per year —-32.9%— +23.5%
5 years —-77.8%— +68.2%
5 years, per year —-26.0%— +11.0%

Risk

MeasurePAPLUWMCFIGRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 137.7%80.2%94.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 123.5%89.8%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.361.472.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.58-0.92-0.49 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.4%-89.5%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.4%-75.2%-68.4% -0.9%
52-week high $4.50$6.10$73.91 $779.14
52-week low $0.58$1.00$21.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAPLUWMCFIGR
P/E now vs peer median -9.0xmedian 11.4x -13.7xmedian 11.4x 21.8xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 2.7x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 7.4xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 81.3xmedian 11.3x 15.2xmedian 11.3x —median 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.4xmedian 6.9x -0.5xmedian 6.9x -60.3xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.7x 2.5xmedian 0.7x 3.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 0.27median 0.34 —median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAPLUWMCFIGR
Revenue $2.78M $3.58B $708.87M
Gross profit – – $620.58M
Operating income -$402.62K – $201.41M
Net income -$2.51M -$104.96M $237.39M
Free cash flow -$5.13M -$4.92B -$86.49M
R&D – – $62.64M
EPS (diluted) $-0.10 $-0.11 $0.96
Cash & equivalents $10.51M $498.41M $1.44B
Total debt $53.03M $19.23B $963.50M
Shares (diluted) 25.58M 337.53M 246.97M
Enterprise value -$9.54M -$1.79B $10.38M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAPLUWMCFIGR
P/E -9.0x -13.7x 21.8x
P/FCF -4.4x -0.5x -60.3x
P/Operating cash flow -4.4x -0.5x -60.3x
P/S 8.1x 0.7x 7.4x
P/B 0.4x 2.5x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 10.1x -0.6x 4.1x
EV/EBITDA 81.3x 15.2x –
EV/EBIT -83.0x 17.1x 23.6x
EV/Revenue 12.0x 2.2x 6.7x
EV/FCF -6.5x -1.6x -54.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -6.5x -1.6x -54.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.27 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAPLUWMCFIGR
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.6% 26.1% 88.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 27.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 90.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 88.0% – 229.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 29.1% -175.0% 279.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -31.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 98.2% -287.6% 36.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -51.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -628.7% -103.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -629.0% -100.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAPLUWMCFIGR
Gross margin – – 87.5%
EBITDA margin 14.8% 14.6% –
Operating margin -14.5% – 28.4%
Pretax margin -74.1% -3.2% 28.3%
Net margin -90.1% -1.0% 33.5%
FCF margin -184.6% -137.6% -12.2%
Operating cash flow margin -184.6% -135.9% -12.2%
Return on equity -5.2% -8.1% 17.6%
Return on assets -3.3% -0.6% 8.3%
Return on invested capital – 6.3% 8.9%
Return on capital employed -1.0% – 12.7%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 46.3x -0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 1.6% 15.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAPLUWMCFIGR
Debt / assets 28.3% 33.5% 31.9%
Debt / equity 0.4x 6.1x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 26.6x 10.6x –
Debt / FCF -4.2x -1.2x -11.1x
Liabilities / assets 31.9% 94.5% 53.2%
Equity / assets 68.1% 5.5% 46.8%
Interest coverage -0.4x 0.8x 3.2x
Current ratio 1.0x – 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.0x – 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x – 1.1x
Altman Z-score 0.30 – 2.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAPLUWMCFIGR
Dividend yield – 19.9% –
Net buyback yield – – -13.2%
Shareholder yield – 19.9% -13.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAPLUWMCFIGR
Forward P/E – 7.9xFY2026 21.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.32FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $1.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +58.3%FY2026 +98.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +26.3% +34.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.16MFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $841.68MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +39.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +63.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +77.2% +37.3% +50.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAPLUWMCFIGR
Held by institutions – 17.0% 66.8%
Institutions holding – 290 307
Change in shares held, QoQ – +31.8% +16.9%
Institutions buying – 213 196
Institutions selling – 50 82
Buyers to sellers – 4.26 2.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAPLUWMCFIGR
PAPL 1.00 0.01 0.05
UWMC 0.01 1.00 0.15
FIGR 0.05 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAPL, UWMC and FIGR?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Pineapple Financial (PAPL) $22.47M, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.35M, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) $5.21B.

Which company is growing faster?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Pineapple Financial (PAPL) -6.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) +88.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) has the highest net margin (Pineapple Financial (PAPL) -90.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 33.5%). On return on invested capital, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 8.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) returned the most: Pineapple Financial (PAPL) -80.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -74.1%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) -46.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UWM Holdings (UWMC) has been the steadiest (Pineapple Financial (PAPL) 137.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.2%, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 94.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAPL, UWMC and FIGR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.