PANW vs ZS vs FTNT Stock Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler and Fortinet Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$394.49 +0.6% 1M +78.2% 1Y
Market cap
$321.51B
P/E
962.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
ZS Zscaler, Inc.
$255.80 +28.3% 1M -22.2% 1Y
Market cap
$41.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$174.08 -1.3% 1M +102.7% 1Y
Market cap
$127.71B
P/E
55.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 5, Palo Alto Networks 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPANWZSFTNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $321.51B $41.71B $127.71B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 962.5x -648.7x 55.9x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 90.3x 56.2x 48.6x FTNT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.5% — +20.2% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.7% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +78.2% -22.2% +102.7% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +36.0%/yr -4.3%/yr +21.0%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.6% 71.1% 43.2% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 — 52/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

PANWZSFTNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPANWZSFTNT
Valuation 42 #72 of 124 15 #105 of 124 31 #86 of 124
Growth 37 #72 of 113 – 67 #38 of 113
Profitability 76 #27 of 109 – 96 #5 of 109
Financial Health 38 #79 of 127 32 #87 of 127 15 #108 of 127
Shareholder Returns 57 #28 of 63 – –
Overall 50 – 52
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ZS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPANWZSFTNTSPY
1 month +0.6%+28.3%-1.3% +0.9%
3 months +25.6%+66.4%+13.6% +5.9%
6 months +117.3%+89.9%+102.2% +8.5%
Year to date +114.2%+13.7%+119.2% +13.3%
1 year +78.2%-22.2%+102.7% +12.4%
3 years +230.4%+65.7%+209.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +49.0%+18.3%+45.8% +23.5%
5 years +364.9%-19.8%+158.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +36.0%-4.3%+21.0% +11.0%
10 years +1,461.7%—+2,637.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +31.6%—+39.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasurePANWZSFTNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.6%71.1%43.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.8%82.4%38.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.250.950.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.58-0.312.38 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.0%-76.4%-38.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.1%-23.9%-10.6% -0.9%
52-week high $419.91$336.27$194.75 $779.14
52-week low $141.67$118.05$75.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePANWZSFTNT
P/E now vs peer median 962.5xmedian 37.9x -648.7xmedian 37.9x 55.9xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 4.4x 12.4xmedian 4.4x 16.2xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 148.8xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 78.2xmedian 26.6x 48.9xmedian 26.6x 41.4xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 3.4x 16.1xmedian 3.4x 56.8xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median -66.50median 1.24 —median 1.24 1.96median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPANWZSFTNT
Revenue $11.48B – $7.88B
Gross profit $8.08B – –
Operating income $695.00M – $2.60B
Net income $307.00M – $2.28B
Free cash flow $4.11B – –
R&D $2.55B – $857.40M
EPS (diluted) $0.40 – $3.08
Cash & equivalents $2.51B $928.35M $3.75B
Shares (diluted) 764.00M 160.22M 739.90M
Enterprise value $306.58B $27.83B $127.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPANWZSFTNT
P/E 962.5x -648.7x 55.9x
P/FCF 78.2x 48.9x 41.4x
P/Operating cash flow 70.6x – 34.6x
P/S 28.0x 12.4x 16.2x
P/B 11.7x 16.1x 56.8x
P/Tangible book 15.7x 17.5x 56.8x
EV/EBITDA 148.8x – –
EV/EBIT 458.2x – –
EV/Revenue 27.7x – 16.2x
EV/FCF 77.4x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 69.9x – 34.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -66.50 – 1.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPANWZSFTNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.5% – 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.5% – 15.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -44.1% – 27.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.5% – 28.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -72.9% – 21.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.3% – 25.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -74.9% – 25.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -14.5% – 28.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.5% – 50.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.9% – 17.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPANWZSFTNT
Gross margin 70.4% – –
EBITDA margin 18.6% – –
Operating margin 6.1% – –
Pretax margin 4.7% – –
Net margin 2.7% – –
FCF margin 35.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin 39.7% – 46.8%
Return on equity 1.1% – 120.1%
Return on assets 0.6% – 20.0%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 1.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 14.8x – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 15.5% – 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPANWZSFTNT
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 43.3% 67.0% 81.2%
Equity / assets 56.7% 33.0% 18.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.7x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.6x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.2x –
Altman Z-score 9.53 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPANWZSFTNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% – –
Shareholder yield -0.1% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPANWZSFTNT
Forward P/E 90.3xFY2027 56.2xFY2027 48.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.37FY2027 $4.55FY2027 $3.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.8%FY2027 +8.1%FY2027 +29.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.5% +27.0% +0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.37BFY2027 $4.07BFY2027 $8.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.5%FY2027 +21.5%FY2027 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.7% +19.4% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPANWZSFTNT
Held by institutions 82.1% 51.4% 68.6%
Institutions holding 2,915 734 1,567
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.6% -3.9% +23.7%
Institutions buying 1,548 416 854
Institutions selling 1,125 236 549
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.76 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PANWZSFTNT
PANW 1.00 0.61 0.77
ZS 0.61 1.00 0.59
FTNT 0.77 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PANW, ZS and FTNT?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $321.51B, Zscaler (ZS) $41.71B, Fortinet (FTNT) $127.71B.

Which stock is cheaper, PANW, ZS and FTNT?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 962.5x, Zscaler (ZS) -648.7x, Fortinet (FTNT) 55.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortinet (FTNT) is cheapest (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 90.3x, Zscaler (ZS) 56.2x, Fortinet (FTNT) 48.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%, Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +78.2%, Zscaler (ZS) -22.2%, Fortinet (FTNT) +102.7%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +36.0%/yr, Zscaler (ZS) -4.3%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +21.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 49.6%, Zscaler (ZS) 71.1%, Fortinet (FTNT) 43.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PANW, ZS and FTNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.