PAHC vs GNVR vs ALRTF Stock Comparison

Phibro Animal Health, Genvor and ALR Technologies SG Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GNVR Genvor Inc
$0.75 -25.0% 1M -62.5% 1Y
Market cap
$27.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Crop Protection and Seeds Basic Materials

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 4, ALR Technologies SG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAHCGNVRALRTFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.55B $27.31M $9.23M PAHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.5x -7.8x -0.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.0% -62.5% 0.0% ALRTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr — -19.7%/yr PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.5% 280.8% 409.1% PAHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 13/100 — PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

PAHCGNVRALRTF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAHCGNVRALRTF
Valuation 92 #54 of 625 10 #85 of 94 47 #121 of 227
Growth 85 #90 of 602 31 #63 of 91 –
Profitability 86 #81 of 551 – –
Financial Health 26 #485 of 656 0 #95 of 95 0 #238 of 238
Shareholder Returns 54 #170 of 365 10 #63 of 70 –
Overall 68 13 –
  • PAHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GNVR ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • ALRTF ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAHCGNVRALRTFSPY
1 month +11.4%-25.0%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +5.5%+275.0%0.0% +3.9%
6 months -29.3%+36.4%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date +2.7%-25.0%0.0% +12.9%
1 year -8.0%-62.5%0.0% +12.3%
3 years +256.4%—-50.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +52.8%—-20.6% +23.3%
5 years +73.0%—-66.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.6%—-19.7% +10.9%
10 years +49.0%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +4.1%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePAHCGNVRALRTFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.5%280.8%409.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.8%460.5%1,100.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.75-0.64-2.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.14-0.220.00 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.9%-97.5%-93.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.6%-62.5%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $59.58$2.00$0.02 $779.14
52-week low $28.52$0.20$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAHCGNVRALRTF
P/E now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 17.2x -7.8xmedian 22.0x -0.6xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 9.0x —median 1.4x 0.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 16.3x —median 12.4x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 157.7xmedian 18.7x -25.9xmedian 15.1x -6.9xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.2x -10.1xmedian 1.6x -0.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.33 0.73median 1.66 —median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAHCGNVRALRTF
Revenue $1.52B – –
Gross profit $512.52M – –
Operating income $194.40M -$4.01M –
Net income $99.72M -$3.45M –
Free cash flow $9.87M -$1.05M –
R&D – $386.20K –
EPS (diluted) $2.43 $-0.10 –
Cash & equivalents $61.42M $196.52K $20.31K
Total debt $2.49B $563.79K $111.80M
Shares (diluted) 40.96M 36.08M 606.99M
Enterprise value $1.23B $26.88M $9.16M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAHCGNVRALRTF
P/E 15.6x -7.8x -0.6x
P/FCF 157.7x -25.9x -6.9x
P/Operating cash flow 22.6x -25.9x –
P/S 1.0x – 0.7x
P/B 4.0x -10.1x -0.3x
P/Tangible book 4.4x -10.1x -0.3x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x – –
EV/EBIT 10.8x -6.9x –
EV/Revenue 1.4x – –
EV/FCF 211.9x -26.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 30.3x -26.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 0.73 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAHCGNVRALRTF
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.1% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 76.0% 33.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.3% -55.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 106.6% 41.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 45.2% -38.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 105.2% 55.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.6% -10.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% -151.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.0% 1.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.4% -151.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.2% 1.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAHCGNVRALRTF
Gross margin 33.8% – –
EBITDA margin 16.8% – –
Operating margin 12.8% – –
Pretax margin 9.0% – –
Net margin 6.6% – –
FCF margin 0.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin 4.5% – –
Return on equity 26.7% – –
Return on assets 6.8% -1,412% –
Return on invested capital 14.2% – –
Return on capital employed 16.8% – –
Asset turnover 1.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAHCGNVRALRTF
Debt / assets 41.1% 117.2% 68,140%
Debt / equity 1.6x -0.1x -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x – –
Debt / FCF 62.5x -0.3x –
Liabilities / assets 74.3% 969.3% 84,236%
Equity / assets 25.7% -869.3% -84,136%
Interest coverage 4.2x -37.1x –
Current ratio 3.0x 0.1x –
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.1x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 3.10 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAHCGNVRALRTF
Dividend yield 1.3% – –
Net buyback yield – -2.8% –
Shareholder yield 1.3% -2.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 197.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAHCGNVRALRTF
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.42FY2027 – –
EPS growth, next FY +6.2%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.53BFY2027 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2027 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAHCGNVRALRTF
Held by institutions 51.5% – –
Institutions holding 208 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.1% – –
Institutions buying 117 – –
Institutions selling 73 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.60 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAHCGNVRALRTF
PAHC 1.00 -0.05 0.03
GNVR -0.05 1.00 0.00
ALRTF 0.03 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAHC, GNVR and ALRTF?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.55B, Genvor (GNVR) $27.31M, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) $9.23M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) returned the most: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -8.0%, Genvor (GNVR) -62.5%, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.0%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.6%/yr, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -19.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.00%. Genvor (GNVR) and ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has been the steadiest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, Genvor (GNVR) 280.8%, ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 409.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAHC, GNVR and ALRTF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.